318:, which is a similar website that seems to have been deemed notable enough to stay. In fact, if STD Wizard has more external media to back it up on the notability front, then this is due to the fact that it is a much older site. As someone who is familiar with the work of both sites, I fail to see a distinction. Of course, this isn't a plea to have the STD Wizard entry removed; quite the contrary - it is an important resource of which people ought to be aware. However, so too does STDUniversity.org serve a similarly notable purpose. Thank you. --
337:
dealt with. If the current topic does not have external sources to support its notability because it is new then it is not yet notable, whether or not it may become notable in the future. The fact that the site "serves a ... notable purpose" is not a criterion for inclusion: Knowledge (XXG)'s notability standard is based on coverage in independent sources, not on what purpose the subject seeks to serve.
447:
so it could be worked on there. I've informed the user of the citation, notability and weasel/peacock guidelines which would need to be addressed before it could be moved back. There is every possiblity that notability will not be achieved. If so, fair enough. I would suggest to the closing admin
414:
article and am happy to do the same with this one as well. However, you state that the piece "asserts roughly the same level of notability for his connection with this website." If you read the article on Powell, you'll see that it barely makes mention of this website, but rather, focuses on his
336:
Comparison with another article is irrelevant. For one thing that one may show more notability than this one, even if you don't see it; for another thing they may both lack notability: there are, unfortunately, many articles which do not satisfy
Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines but have not yet been
415:
career and contributions to the medical testing field. I appreciate your position with respect to either article, but your comment above implies that the Powell article's only claim to notability lies in the fact that he is connected with this website, which is far from the case.
313:
article - While
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines are fairly substantial, they are also, to an extent, open to interpretation. This topic is no more or less notable than similar pages that have not been tagged for deletion; specifically,
160:
214:
115:
154:
266:
240:
120:
391:
by the same creator is currently tagged for speedy deletion and asserts roughly the same level of notability for his connection with this website.
88:
83:
92:
358:
A lack of independent sources, either cited in the article or found on searching. Also the article is somewhat promotional in character.
75:
17:
175:
142:
444:
469:
36:
397:
136:
468:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
454:
430:
401:
367:
346:
327:
303:
281:
255:
229:
203:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
383:
for this organization; "ought to be aware" isn't the same as "are aware", and unfortunately the difference is
132:
79:
363:
342:
182:
392:
71:
63:
440:
426:
411:
388:
323:
273:
247:
221:
195:
168:
450:
277:
251:
225:
199:
315:
148:
359:
338:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
384:
299:
53:
291:
192:
376:
422:
319:
380:
294:
either, no published sources. COI notice - I got my undergrad degree from there. -
109:
295:
49:
448:
of this afd that instead of deleting, the same could be done here.
462:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
167:
181:
215:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
472:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
241:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
261:
235:
209:
265:: This debate has been included in the
239:: This debate has been included in the
213:: This debate has been included in the
191:Non-notable website, that does not meet
387:. Closing admin please note also that
290:. Non-notable website, does not meet
410:I am currently working to revise the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
292:the website notability guideline
1:
445:User:HealthGal/Tracey Powell
489:
455:23:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
431:21:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
402:17:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
368:14:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
347:14:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
328:14:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
304:14:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
282:14:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
256:14:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
230:14:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
204:14:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
58:10:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
465:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
439:I've moved the article
379:to demonstrate any
44:The result was
400:
284:
270:
258:
244:
232:
218:
72:STDUniversity.org
64:STDUniversity.org
480:
467:
396:
393:Accounting4Taste
377:reliable sources
271:
245:
219:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
488:
487:
483:
482:
481:
479:
478:
477:
476:
470:deletion review
463:
296:Smerdis of Tlön
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
486:
484:
475:
474:
458:
457:
419:
418:
417:
416:
405:
404:
370:
352:
351:
350:
349:
331:
330:
307:
306:
285:
259:
233:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
485:
473:
471:
466:
460:
459:
456:
453:
452:
446:
442:
441:Tracey Powell
438:
435:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
413:
412:Tracey Powell
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
399:
394:
390:
389:Tracey Powell
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
309:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
283:
279:
275:
268:
264:
260:
257:
253:
249:
242:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
464:
461:
449:
436:
420:
372:
360:JamesBWatson
355:
339:JamesBWatson
310:
287:
262:
236:
210:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
385:advertising
155:free images
381:notability
316:STD Wizard
423:HealthGal
320:HealthGal
451:Stephen!
274:Codf1977
248:Codf1977
222:Codf1977
196:Codf1977
116:View log
437:Comment
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
375:. No
373:Delete
356:Delete
288:Delete
193:WP:ORG
133:Google
93:delete
50:Stifle
46:delete
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
427:talk
398:talk
364:talk
343:talk
324:talk
311:Keep
300:talk
278:talk
263:Note
252:talk
237:Note
226:talk
211:Note
200:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
443:to
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
429:)
421:--
366:)
345:)
326:)
302:)
280:)
269:.
254:)
243:.
228:)
217:.
202:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
425:(
395::
362:(
341:(
322:(
298:(
276:(
272:—
250:(
246:—
224:(
220:—
198:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.