397:. I was trying to learn the AfD process with the goal of nominating this article myself. As I see it, it clearly does not meet the criteria for notability. In light of the recent edits and general tone of the sources, I hope Dr. Mallick is well.
202:
284:
670:
196:
350:
163:
439:
C1; I also cross-checked with the publications listed in the article in case there were variations of his name. No sign of other NPROF criteria or of GNG notability.
372:
306:
258:
604:
to have published it in the
European Journal of Physics, but that seems both false and unlikely to me. At a glance, the paper looks like meaningless word salad.
328:
110:
418:
criterion, and the possibility of a recent turn to crankery only makes the need for reliable sourcing that is independent of the subject more pressing. —
136:
131:
95:
140:
242:
123:
639:
217:
581:. Are we talking about the same person in all the publications or is the name a common one and hence merged within google scholar?
579:
Econophysics Haag’s
Theorem and Stock Market Nanotechnology system, Soumitra K.Mallick, European Journal of Physics, Archived, 2015
184:
90:
83:
17:
59:
245:
citations, no hits on Scopus or Web of
Knowledge, and basically no coverage in independent reliable sources. The subject's
178:
653:
646:
626:
613:
585:
569:
550:
533:
516:
499:
482:
469:
448:
427:
406:
386:
364:
342:
320:
298:
276:
104:
100:
65:
174:
695:
127:
40:
444:
423:
254:
602:
246:
224:
622:
is listed? It claims an "impact factor" of 0.756. If it is listed then the above paper is a pass else fail.
119:
71:
546:
640:
https://iopscience.iop.org/nsearch?terms=Econophysics+Haag+Theorem+and+Stock+Market+Nanotechnology+system
691:
666:
564:
512:
495:
36:
491:
190:
440:
419:
250:
238:
210:
643:
623:
609:
582:
402:
542:
529:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
690:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
662:
559:
508:
478:
465:
457:
436:
658:
415:
605:
398:
234:
53:
598:
525:
377:
355:
333:
311:
289:
267:
262:
157:
265:) that are unverified in independent sources and can't be taken at face value. —
461:
619:
618:
Does anyone have access to
Journal Citation Reports (JCR) to check whether
657:
is a real journal, but (a) one paper being published is far from passing
642:
yielded zero results. A random check of an outlier that failed.
636:
Econophysics Haag’s
Theorem and Stock Market Nanotechnology system
249:
makes various dubious claims (including a purported proof of the
686:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
477:: Fails GNG and no reliable sources found on doing a WP:BEFORE
524:
The citiation count is not enough to make him pass for NPROF.
285:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
661:, and (b) the claim of being published there looks untrue.
257:
journal and membership in "The
Econometric Society" which
153:
149:
145:
209:
597:: I can only find that article on Dr. Mallick's own
541:: Notable reliable sources not found. Fails GNG.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
698:). No further edits should be made to this page.
371:Note: This discussion has been included in the
351:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
349:Note: This discussion has been included in the
327:Note: This discussion has been included in the
305:Note: This discussion has been included in the
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
373:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
307:list of Economics-related deletion discussions
223:
8:
620:https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/0143-0807
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
577:per nom. I also see a physics publication:
370:
348:
329:list of India-related deletion discussions
326:
304:
282:
253:using e-commerce published in a predatory
460:. The Earl of York stuff is ridiclous. --
7:
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
601:page. He appears to claim here
490:. Per everything written above.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
507:as others have already said. -
1:
414:. No evidence of passing any
654:European Journal of Physics
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
715:
671:17:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
647:06:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
627:06:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
614:22:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
586:12:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
570:12:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
551:23:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
534:17:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
517:21:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
500:20:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
483:16:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
470:22:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
449:21:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
428:20:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
407:20:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
387:19:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
365:19:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
343:19:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
321:19:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
299:19:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
277:19:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
66:22:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
688:Please do not modify it.
255:Science Publishing Group
32:Please do not modify it.
241:. The subject has few
120:Soumitra Kumar Mallick
72:Soumitra Kumar Mallick
84:Articles for deletion
251:P versus NP problem
389:
382:
367:
360:
345:
338:
323:
316:
301:
294:
272:
247:own autobiography
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
64:
706:
567:
562:
456:. Does not pass
385:
380:
363:
358:
341:
336:
319:
314:
297:
292:
275:
270:
228:
227:
213:
161:
143:
81:
56:
34:
714:
713:
709:
708:
707:
705:
704:
703:
702:
696:deletion review
565:
560:
383:
376:
361:
354:
339:
332:
317:
310:
295:
288:
273:
266:
170:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
712:
710:
701:
700:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
644:Vikram Vincent
624:Vikram Vincent
589:
588:
583:Vikram Vincent
572:
553:
536:
519:
502:
485:
472:
451:
441:Russ Woodroofe
430:
420:David Eppstein
409:
391:
390:
379:
368:
357:
346:
335:
324:
313:
302:
291:
269:
243:Google Scholar
231:
230:
167:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
58:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
711:
699:
697:
693:
689:
684:
683:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
655:
650:
649:
648:
645:
641:
637:
634:A search for
633:
630:
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
603:
600:
596:
593:
592:
591:
590:
587:
584:
580:
576:
573:
571:
568:
563:
557:
554:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
480:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
388:
384:
374:
369:
366:
362:
352:
347:
344:
340:
330:
325:
322:
318:
308:
303:
300:
296:
286:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
687:
685:
652:
635:
631:
599:researchgate
594:
578:
574:
555:
543:TheDreamBoat
538:
521:
504:
487:
474:
453:
435:. Far from
432:
411:
394:
263:Earl of York
239:WP:NACADEMIC
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
77:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
509:Kj cheetham
492:Anton.bersh
197:free images
663:XOR'easter
692:talk page
558:per nom
259:calls him
37:talk page
694:or in a
606:Knuthove
458:WP:NPROF
437:WP:NPROF
399:Knuthove
164:View log
105:glossary
54:Eddie891
39:or in a
659:WP:PROF
632:Comment
595:Comment
526:Setreis
416:WP:PROF
203:WP refs
191:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
575:Delete
561:Devoke
556:Delete
539:Delete
522:Delete
505:Delete
488:Delete
475:Delete
462:Kbabej
454:Delete
433:Delete
412:Delete
395:Delete
235:WP:GNG
233:Fails
175:Google
141:delete
50:delete
566:water
479:Kichu
378:MarkH
356:MarkH
334:MarkH
312:MarkH
290:MarkH
268:MarkH
261:the
218:JSTOR
179:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
667:talk
651:The
610:talk
547:talk
530:talk
513:talk
496:talk
481:🐘
466:talk
445:talk
424:talk
403:talk
375:. —
353:. —
331:. —
309:. —
287:. —
237:and
211:FENS
185:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
60:Work
638:on
225:TWL
162:– (
669:)
612:)
549:)
532:)
515:)
498:)
468:)
447:)
426:)
405:)
381:21
359:21
337:21
315:21
293:21
271:21
205:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
52:.
665:(
608:(
545:(
528:(
511:(
494:(
464:(
443:(
422:(
401:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.