249:, and can show notability factors like having been reviewed by professional film critics and/or winning or being nominated for major film awards. But the release date here is still TBA, and the sourcing consists of two unreliable sources that aren't support for notability at all and two very short blurbs that aren't substantive enough to deem this as having already cleared the bar. Obviously this is without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the film has been released and clears the notability bar accordingly, but nothing here is enough to deem this film already notable today.
371:"Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production."
236:
as the subject of sufficient coverage to divorce its notability from the primary inclusion criteria for films. As always, we do not necessarily want to indiscriminately maintain an article about every future film that
198:
344:
The problem with the draftify solution is that one or two more citations and the editor will resubmit their article to move to article space. And then we have this discussion all over again.
159:
192:
286:
309:
I think this is a candidate for delete as the article is based on proposed announcement. I feel article for announced or not released films should not be allowed.
266:
91:
106:
132:
127:
136:
245:
of coverage during the production process (e.g. Star Wars or Marvel films), we're normally only interested in films that have actually been
119:
86:
79:
17:
213:
180:
100:
96:
419:
40:
331:
174:
402:
381:
353:
335:
318:
298:
278:
258:
61:
170:
314:
123:
415:
327:
220:
36:
57:
229:
206:
310:
115:
67:
377:
349:
294:
274:
254:
186:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
414:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
390:
366:
398:
53:
233:
326:
would be my vote. Has notable people associated with it so it might become notable.
373:
345:
290:
270:
250:
153:
394:
241:
the production pipeline -- with rare exceptions for films that garner a
410:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
145:
141:
205:
219:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:Note: This discussion has been included in the
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
232:article about an as yet unreleased film, not
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
287:list of India-related deletion discussions
284:
264:
267:list of Film-related deletion discussions
389:: The production does not seem to meet
370:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
1:
403:15:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
382:07:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
354:07:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
336:18:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
319:08:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
299:19:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
279:19:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
259:19:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
62:21:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
439:
365:- Fails GNG and NFF. Per
412:Please do not modify it.
367:Notability, future films
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
393:guidelines yet. --
116:Sam Bahadur (film)
68:Sam Bahadur (film)
301:
281:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
430:
328:Nomadicghumakkad
234:reliably sourced
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
438:
437:
433:
432:
431:
429:
428:
427:
426:
420:deletion review
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
436:
434:
425:
424:
406:
405:
384:
359:
358:
357:
356:
339:
338:
321:
303:
302:
282:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
435:
423:
421:
417:
413:
408:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
383:
379:
375:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
311:Advait.kansal
308:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
231:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
409:
386:
362:
323:
306:
246:
242:
238:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
193:free images
230:WP:TOOSOON
54:Malcolmxl5
416:talk page
37:talk page
418:or in a
324:Draftify
247:released
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
374:Platonk
346:Platonk
291:Bearcat
271:Bearcat
251:Bearcat
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
391:WP:NFF
387:Delete
363:Delete
307:Delete
239:enters
171:Google
137:delete
50:delete
395:Ab207
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
399:talk
378:talk
350:talk
332:talk
315:talk
295:talk
275:talk
255:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
243:lot
221:TWL
158:– (
401:)
380:)
369::
352:)
334:)
317:)
297:)
289:.
277:)
269:.
257:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
397:(
376:(
348:(
330:(
313:(
293:(
273:(
253:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.