476:: With the sources found by TheCatalyst31, I think this passes GNG. However, I think the article can't really be expanded beyond the current size much. The sources, after removing all the verbiage about how they determined the history, all pretty much just said when the house was built, who built it, and that it was where Washington spent a night (with more or less information about any of those items). From the primary sources listed in the article we can get information about the house's construction, architecture, and decorations, but I am not sure how much that information will add to the encyclopedia. No, really, I have no idea; hence my "keep or merge" vote. If adding that sort of thing will make the encyclopedia better, then keep it. If it won't, then merge.
380:
sources to have already been produced. In any event, I haven't seen any notability guidelines explicitly granting presumptive notability to buildings in which
Washington (allegedly) slept, but NOTINHERITED definitely covers whether every building in a historic district is notable: thankfully, not, because the notion of a Knowledge (XXG) article on the tenement apartment building in which I lived for three years (and which just happened to be in the boundaries of a
428:"Properties within a historic district fall into one of two types of property: contributing and non-contributing. A contributing property, such as a 19th-century mansion, helps make a historic district historic, while a non-contributing property, such as a modern medical clinic, does not. The contributing properties are key to a historic district's historic associations, historic architectural qualities, or archaeological qualities"
501:(click the INV link to download the file) suggests that the house actually would be historically significant enough to be listed on the National Register independently, though a listing wasn't pursued since it was already preserved as part of the historic district. There are also plenty of sources here to meet
379:
I couldn't readily count the number of AfDs I've seen where a previous AfD a decade earlier closed on the basis of "further research will likely reveal more sources" ... never to have done so, obviously. This notion has always flown in the face of settled policies and guidelines requiring such
416:"Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable."
207:
361:
clearly indicates it is. This article is less than one week old. Further research will likely reveal more sources and there should be no delete, but rather expansion to this very specific piece of
American history.
238:
no apparent evidence for notability, unless every house where George
Washington slept for one night is notable. There is no evidence that the building is on any historical register. If it is, it would be notable.
506:
518:
514:
347:
570:
As per nominator "There is no evidence that the building is on any historical register. If it is, it would be notable." Since it is on the
National Register of Historic Places, it would be notable.
497:
While buildings that are on the
National Register through historic districts are only independently notable if proven otherwise, this house actually does seem to be independently notable. The
388:
in the "significant detail" the GNG requires, they should be produced. If not, the content can be merged into the historic district article, which is just a scanty paragraph long itself.
381:
258:
277:
436:. I can see few situations in which a large 18th-century house would not be considered notable anywhere in the world, whether it had associations with someone famous or not. --
160:
201:
52:. Opinions were split between keeping and merging. Since the latter can be done outside of the scope of an AfD without any admin assistance, this seems like the best option.
297:
92:
350:, may just indicate that "every house where George Washington slept for one night is notable', especially if it is still standing, and certainly if it is a
553:. The rather limited notable information about this house would be better served in the context of the district article, rather than a separate permastub.
107:
167:
133:
128:
137:
120:
331:
87:
80:
17:
222:
550:
534:
355:
327:
60:
189:
101:
97:
408:, was cursory, since several sources were easy to find and could easily "be produced",as this building clearly saisfies
321:
627:
40:
324:
183:
610:
596:
579:
562:
541:
525:
485:
464:
445:
398:
371:
339:
309:
289:
269:
250:
62:
179:
124:
558:
335:
305:
285:
229:
409:
623:
421:
351:
36:
441:
389:
58:
477:
456:
215:
116:
68:
405:
592:
554:
522:
481:
460:
301:
281:
195:
359:
510:
262:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
622:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
575:
367:
502:
538:
437:
53:
588:
587:. Several good sources in article and elsewhere, per TheCatalyst31. Clearly notable.
246:
604:. Current version of article greatly improved. Meets GNG per sources found by TC31.
498:
154:
571:
363:
241:
605:
330:, though I have been unable to determine if it is a listed property.
384:) is a gigglefit. In any event, if there are sources discussing
618:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
348:
List of
Washington's Headquarters during the Revolutionary War
505:; in addition to the ones already in the article, there's
326:) indicate that this property is located within the NRHP
150:
146:
142:
214:
537:, of which this building is a contributing property.
228:
513:(free to borrow with an account), and sections of
259:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
278:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
630:). No further edits should be made to this page.
296:Note: This discussion has been included in the
276:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
298:list of History-related deletion discussions
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
295:
275:
256:
320:Town and historical society documents (
509:, coverage of the interior design in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
507:this extensive section of a journal
24:
551:Dedham Village Historic District
535:Dedham Village Historic District
356:Dedham Village Historic District
328:Dedham Village Historic District
93:Introduction to deletion process
1:
611:03:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
597:00:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
486:14:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
63:12:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
580:22:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
563:18:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
542:17:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
526:14:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
465:14:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
446:09:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
399:02:59, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
372:16:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
340:16:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
310:12:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
290:12:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
270:10:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
251:09:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
647:
410:Knowledge (XXG):NBUILDING
620:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
420:Addtionally, stated at
430:
418:
406:Knowledge (XXG):BEFORE
499:MACRIS inventory file
426:
422:contributing property
414:
352:contributing property
81:Articles for deletion
117:Samuel Dexter House
69:Samuel Dexter House
312:
292:
272:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
638:
412:, which states:
395:
267:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
646:
645:
641:
640:
639:
637:
636:
635:
634:
628:deletion review
519:this other book
454:per Ravenswing.
391:
263:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
644:
642:
633:
632:
614:
613:
599:
582:
565:
544:
531:Merge/redirect
528:
491:
490:
489:
488:
468:
467:
448:
402:
401:
374:
342:
314:
313:
293:
273:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
643:
631:
629:
625:
621:
616:
615:
612:
609:
608:
603:
600:
598:
594:
590:
586:
583:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
564:
560:
556:
555:Pi.1415926535
552:
548:
545:
543:
540:
536:
532:
529:
527:
524:
523:TheCatalyst31
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
492:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:Keep or Merge
472:
471:
470:
469:
466:
462:
458:
455:
453:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
431:
429:
425:
423:
417:
413:
411:
407:
400:
397:
396:
394:
387:
386:this building
383:
382:NHRP district
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
360:
357:
353:
349:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
332:24.151.50.175
329:
325:
322:
319:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:Coolabahapple
299:
294:
291:
287:
283:
282:Coolabahapple
279:
274:
271:
268:
266:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
243:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
619:
617:
606:
601:
584:
567:
546:
530:
494:
473:
451:
450:
433:
427:
419:
415:
403:
392:
390:
385:
376:
344:
317:
265:CAPTAIN RAJU
264:
240:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
393:Ravenswing
345:Speedy Keep
202:free images
539:Neutrality
438:Necrothesp
55:Ritchie333
624:talk page
515:this book
511:this book
404:Clearly,
37:talk page
626:or in a
589:Station1
478:Rockphed
457:Rockphed
358:, which
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
568:Comment
377:Delete:
354:to the
318:Comment
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
572:Djflem
503:WP:GNG
452:Delete
364:Djflem
180:Google
138:delete
547:Merge
247:talk
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
602:Keep
593:talk
585:Keep
576:talk
559:talk
517:and
495:Keep
482:talk
461:talk
442:talk
434:Keep
368:talk
336:talk
323:and
306:talk
286:talk
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
549:to
533:to
242:DGG
230:TWL
159:– (
607:MB
595:)
578:)
561:)
521:.
484:)
463:)
444:)
424::
370:)
338:)
308:)
300:.
288:)
280:.
261:.
249:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
591:(
574:(
557:(
480:(
459:(
440:(
366:(
334:(
304:(
284:(
245:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.