352:
457:. If another wikipedian is willing to take ownership of that article – if they're willing to check for copyright violations and then examine the sources to see if it doesn't misrepresent them in some subtle way – then absolutely, let's import it here. But it's not enough if it just looks "decent". –
350:
but clean up. It was quite correct that this was sent here instead of surreptitiously deleted-by-redirect, but (1) AfD is not clean-up, and (2) things should be deleted if it is likely that there will be no sources, or if they are so, so dreadful that an absolutely fresh start is necessary. In this
357:), and although the article is in dire need of good writing, it's not totally irredeemable. The character-list, info-box and popular-culture sections are a good start; what it really needs is a comprehensible, coherent plot-summary and some better referencing.
545:
there is nothing here that is worth saving under any ATD nor anything that is comprehensible in
English. If there is such a "myth element", there are no sources available in the article or in searches that demonstrate such exists.
202:
413:
known for POV. The article on simple wiki seems in a much better shape, but it was written by the same sockpuppets after they got blocked here, so this means: 1) if the article is imported it will be eligible for
392:
from Simple
English Knowledge. It will still need to be cleaned up (and the story section pared down, I think), but it's much better than our current version, and with MUCH better sources.--
233:
410:
431:
the simple version might have been written by a sock, but it's a decent article; we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot if we deleted it because of its authorship. We have the
159:
196:
303:
326:
106:
91:
132:
127:
136:
422:
the topic is notable (and that's what we're supposed to be finding out here), then we're better off creating the article from scratch. –
119:
453:
Of course. But the relevant point here is not that the article was created by a sock, the point is that it was created by a sock
217:
555:
86:
79:
17:
184:
409:
someone writes it up from scratch. The article has serious sourcing and comprehensibility issues, and it was written by
163:
100:
96:
523:
507:
476:
178:
575:
40:
558:
529:
496:
461:
448:
426:
401:
384:
366:
341:
318:
295:
61:
174:
123:
224:
571:
518:
36:
440:
358:
552:
444:
397:
362:
210:
491:
190:
458:
423:
115:
75:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
255:
57:
248:
547:
393:
267:
241:
542:
486:
379:
279:
275:
263:
237:
415:
271:
153:
333:
310:
287:
53:
418:
speedy deletion, 2) the doubts around sourcing and neutrality will remain.
355:
244:
of 22 January 2020 and send to AfD instead. Rosguill's BLAR rationale was
247:
Doesn't seem to meet GNG and is very confusingly written, redirecting to
439:. If anyone doubts its neutrality, we have tags for that sort of thing.
258:
objected on the basis that
Sandrembi Chaisra is not mentioned there.
375:
351:
case sources are likely to be available (based on its presence in
566:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
510:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
479:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
149:
145:
141:
209:
516:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
485:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
578:). No further edits should be made to this page.
325:Note: This discussion has been included in the
302:Note: This discussion has been included in the
304:list of Mythology-related deletion discussions
435:to delete the products of socks, but not the
245:
223:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
327:list of India-related deletion discussions
324:
301:
7:
236:, where I found consensus to revert
260:Courtesy pings to all RfD !voters:
232:I am neutral, filing as closer of
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
559:22:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
530:20:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
497:12:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
62:15:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
462:22:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
449:21:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
427:17:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
402:16:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
385:12:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
374:would a transwiki from the
367:12:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
342:08:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
319:08:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
296:08:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
595:
568:Please do not modify it.
376:simple wikipedia version
251:which mentions the story
32:Please do not modify it.
253:
164:edits since nomination
80:Articles for deletion
455:with content issues
532:
499:
344:
321:
116:Sandrembi Chaisra
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
68:Sandrembi Chaisra
586:
550:
528:
526:
521:
515:
513:
511:
494:
489:
484:
482:
480:
382:
340:
338:
336:
317:
315:
313:
294:
292:
290:
283:
228:
227:
213:
157:
139:
77:
34:
594:
593:
589:
588:
587:
585:
584:
583:
582:
576:deletion review
548:
524:
519:
517:
506:
504:
492:
487:
475:
473:
380:
334:
331:
330:
311:
308:
307:
288:
285:
284:
261:
249:Meetei folklore
170:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
592:
590:
581:
580:
562:
561:
535:
534:
514:
501:
483:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
459:Uanfala (talk)
424:Uanfala (talk)
407:Delete, unless
404:
387:
369:
345:
322:
231:
230:
167:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
591:
579:
577:
573:
569:
564:
563:
560:
557:
554:
551:
544:
540:
537:
536:
533:
531:
527:
522:
512:
509:
502:
500:
498:
495:
490:
481:
478:
471:
470:
463:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
386:
383:
377:
373:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
349:
346:
343:
337:
328:
323:
320:
314:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
291:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
257:
252:
250:
243:
239:
235:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
567:
565:
538:
505:
503:
474:
472:
454:
436:
432:
419:
406:
389:
371:
347:
259:
246:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
525:Mississippi
378:suffice? --
256:AFreshStart
197:free images
437:obligation
411:a sockfarm
339:(she/they)
316:(she/they)
293:(she/they)
572:talk page
556:(contrib)
549:Eggishorn
441:Elemimele
394:Aervanath
359:Elemimele
268:Aervanath
254:to which
37:talk page
574:or in a
508:Relisted
477:Relisted
381:Lenticel
280:Mdewman6
276:SnowFire
264:Lenticel
238:Rosguill
234:this RfD
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
372:Comment
278:, and
272:Uanfala
203:WP refs
191:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
553:(talk)
543:WP:TNT
539:Delete
493:plicit
390:Import
335:Tamzin
312:Tamzin
289:Tamzin
175:Google
137:delete
54:Stifle
50:delete
433:right
416:WP:G5
218:JSTOR
179:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
541:per
520:Star
445:talk
398:talk
363:talk
354:and
348:Keep
242:BLAR
211:FENS
185:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
332:--
309:--
286:--
240:'s
225:TWL
158:– (
447:)
420:If
400:)
365:)
329:.
306:.
274:,
270:,
266:,
205:)
162:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
488:✗
443:(
396:(
361:(
282::
262:@
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.