Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sandrine Matiasek - Knowledge

Source 📝

243: 355:
study" has little depth of coverage of Matiasek, spending more of its attention on her coauthors and their study. "Blue Dot" is a local radio station interview with the subject, not a story about her. And "Students study" is, as the title suggests, mostly about a student research project, with only incidental mention of Matiasek's role in directing the students. I don't think that's enough depth and prominence of coverage for GNG either. —
354:
instead, based on the "media appearances" section. Several of the sources listed there are non-independent (published by CSU Chico, her employer). Otherwise, we have three local news stories in NSPR and the Chico Enterprise-Record. Of these, "Chico State professors publish Camp Fire water pollution
204: 283: 275: 161: 198: 279: 371: 346:. She has good citation counts for one publication, but she is in the middle position among the authors of that one, and nothing else stands out as evidence for 303: 108: 93: 271: 134: 129: 138: 121: 392: 451: 219: 291: 259: 88: 81: 17: 186: 447: 165: 102: 98: 287: 255: 180: 472: 40: 455: 434: 415: 397: 364: 360: 338: 312: 295: 263: 63: 176: 428: 125: 226: 387: 36: 117: 69: 443: 424: 356: 326: 212: 247: 192: 411: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
467:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
376: 468: 251: 347: 334: 322: 307: 351: 407: 155: 330: 54: 236: 321:
page reads like a resume. Associate professor with little impact,
463:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
406:
way too early with no real verification of notability as yet.
151: 147: 143: 211: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 475:). No further edits should be made to this page. 370:Note: This discussion has been included in the 302:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 372:list of California-related deletion discussions 250:, not seeing anything that might take her past 225: 8: 350:notability. That leaves a potential pass of 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 369: 304:list of Women-related deletion discussions 301: 269: 7: 24: 274:lists for the following topics: 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 398:00:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 365:23:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 339:22:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 313:21:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 296:21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 264:21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 235:Associate professor with an 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 492: 456:18:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 435:15:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 416:04:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC) 64:23:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 465:Please do not modify it. 325:and doesn't fulfill any 284:United States of America 32:Please do not modify it. 276:Academics and educators 448:Pharaoh of the Wizards 166:edits since nomination 288:Justlettersandnumbers 256:Justlettersandnumbers 248:6 according to Google 82:Articles for deletion 242:of 8 according to 400: 315: 298: 118:Sandrine Matiasek 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 70:Sandrine Matiasek 483: 431: 395: 390: 383: 379: 310: 272:deletion sorting 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 491: 490: 486: 485: 484: 482: 481: 480: 479: 473:deletion review 429: 393: 388: 381: 377: 308: 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 489: 487: 478: 477: 459: 458: 442:per nom fails 437: 423:does not meet 418: 401: 367: 357:David Eppstein 341: 316: 299: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 488: 476: 474: 470: 466: 461: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 438: 436: 433: 426: 422: 419: 417: 413: 409: 405: 402: 399: 396: 391: 386: 385: 384: 373: 368: 366: 362: 358: 353: 349: 345: 342: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 317: 314: 311: 305: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 239: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 464: 462: 444:WP:NACADEMIC 439: 430:microbiology 425:WP:NACADEMIC 420: 403: 380: 375: 343: 327:WP:NACADEMIC 318: 237: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 280:Environment 199:free images 329:criteria. 469:talk page 382:Quidditch 309:Spiderone 37:talk page 471:or in a 252:WP:NPROF 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 408:Ldm1954 348:WP:PROF 323:WP:MILL 282:, and 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 440:Delete 432:Marcus 421:Delete 404:Delete 352:WP:GNG 344:Delete 319:Delete 244:Scopus 240:-index 177:Google 139:delete 50:delete 246:, or 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 452:talk 412:talk 361:talk 335:talk 331:Broc 292:talk 260:talk 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 227:TWL 160:– ( 52:‎. 454:) 427:. 414:) 378:WC 374:. 363:) 337:) 306:. 294:) 286:. 278:, 262:) 254:. 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 60:iz 450:( 446:. 410:( 394:✎ 389:☎ 359:( 333:( 290:( 258:( 238:h 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 57:L

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Liz
23:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Sandrine Matiasek

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Sandrine Matiasek
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.