386:
380:
the articles of the town, where the barangay is located. Example, you're planning to delete
Barangay 41 in G City (example only). Since the barangay is possibly well known, then the text regarding that barangay will be moved to the G City article. And if it is too big, well create it on your own userpages. Problem solved. -
317:
plainly stated my reasons being that there can be no reliable sources about these barangays from which to source a full article about it. Note that I haven't said that there shouldn't be any mention about these barangays in
Knowledge, just that barangays don't deserve individual articles. I should know, I'm Filipino. --
252:
Not necessarily. There comes a point when some geographical unit is too small or too trivial that it doesn't deserve its own article and should instead be aggregated elsewhere. A blanket statement like "X's have inherent notability" is not a good argument in itself. You have to back it up with more
379:
to the San Pablo City article (under the barangays section). Deleting it would have removed information that could have been valuable to the locals living in that certain area. besides, I'm a native of San pablo City and other unnotable articles (with good content) should be transfered instead to
316:
Please note that Common
Outcomes is not a guideline much less policy. It just documents what's been the result of many AfD and is not policy. So appealing to it is also not a convincing argument in itself. So it would be best if you argue about saving this article on the subject's merits. I have
407:, perhaps the info on Lake Calibato's location and the watershed but everything else can be discarded. If you want, create a table on the barangay section with the residing brgy. captain, area, population and fiesta. --
145:. So given the small size of barangays, naturally, almost all of them would not be notable, even though they'd have high populations. The only barangays that should be notable may be barangays that have large
122:
178:
267:
340:
Almost all barangays in the
Philippines are not notable enough in themselves to merit individual articles in Knowledge and there is a problem of getting enough
95:
90:
414:
300:
236:
156:
99:
82:
345:
278:
214:
138:
17:
293:
Our house is seen on our municipal map. If you'd want to verify, visit the municipal engineer. So is it OK for
Knowledge? --
203:
395:
60:
485:
419:
392:
305:
241:
161:
36:
467:
452:
425:
398:
371:
357:
326:
311:
288:
262:
247:
224:
193:
167:
64:
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
270::"Geological features named on maps, such as Willow Creek Pass (Montana), are verifiable and so acceptable".--
86:
134:
389:
56:
448:
464:
440:
409:
295:
283:
231:
219:
151:
78:
70:
381:
52:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
444:
189:
461:
273:
209:
385:
404:
353:
322:
258:
47:
366:
341:
146:
133:. A barangay is the smallest political unit in the Philippines, a part of either a
116:
185:
349:
318:
254:
130:
348:
does not turn up any non-trivial sources that refer to this barangay. --
436:
441:
a resort located in the barangay that was mentioned in Yahoo! Travel
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
460:, political units in all countries should have articles. --
268:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Geography
439:(click "Region IV-Southern Tagalog" then "Laguna") and
112:
108:
104:
403:
I dunno what info from this article maybe merged to
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
229:That means everything on earth is notable? LOL. --
488:). No further edits should be made to this page.
179:list of Philippines-related deletion discussions
149:about them. This barangay doesn't have any. --
51:, and all relevant information can be merged.
8:
344:to create a full-fledged article. A simple
435:. Only notable data are the following:
177:: This debate has been included in the
202:geography based subjects should have
7:
24:
437:population census as of May 2000
384:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
468:02:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
65:02:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
453:04:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
426:09:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
399:09:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
372:09:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
358:06:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
327:09:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
312:02:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
289:01:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
263:01:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
248:05:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
225:05:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
194:04:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
168:03:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
505:
433:Merge to "San Pablo City"
253:substantial arguments. --
481:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
147:significant literature
365:per Seav and Howard--
61:write these articles
204:inherent notability
143:they are NOT towns
129:This article is a
79:Santo Angel (Ilog)
71:Santo Angel (Ilog)
196:
182:
496:
483:
422:
417:
412:
388:
377:Redirect instead
369:
342:reliable sources
308:
303:
298:
281:
276:
244:
239:
234:
217:
212:
183:
173:
164:
159:
154:
120:
102:
34:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:deletion review
479:
420:
415:
410:
367:
306:
301:
296:
279:
274:
242:
237:
232:
215:
210:
162:
157:
152:
93:
77:
74:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
502:
500:
491:
490:
473:
471:
470:
455:
430:
429:
428:
405:San Pablo City
374:
360:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
314:
250:
197:
127:
126:
73:
68:
48:San Pablo City
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
501:
489:
487:
482:
476:
475:
474:
469:
466:
463:
459:
456:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
427:
424:
423:
418:
413:
406:
402:
401:
400:
397:
394:
391:
387:
383:
378:
375:
373:
370:
364:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:Google search
343:
339:
336:
328:
324:
320:
315:
313:
310:
309:
304:
299:
292:
291:
290:
287:
286:
285:
282:
277:
269:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
251:
249:
246:
245:
240:
235:
228:
227:
226:
223:
222:
221:
218:
213:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
180:
176:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
165:
160:
155:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
472:
457:
432:
408:
393:Vandalize it
382:iaNLOPEZ1115
376:
362:
337:
294:
284:(yada, yada)
272:
271:
230:
220:(yada, yada)
208:
207:
199:
174:
150:
142:
139:municipality
128:
53:MessedRocker
46:Redirect to
45:
43:
31:
28:
445:Starczamora
390:TaLKBaCK
368:Lenticel
131:barangay
123:View log
338:Delete.
96:protect
91:history
411:Howard
363:Delete
297:Howard
280:crewer
233:Howard
216:crewer
186:Canley
153:Howard
100:delete
465:Quill
462:Oldak
141:, so
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
458:Keep
449:talk
421:Duck
354:talk
350:seav
323:talk
319:seav
307:Duck
275:brew
259:talk
255:seav
243:Duck
211:brew
206:. --
200:Keep
190:talk
175:Note
163:Duck
135:city
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
57:talk
416:the
396:UBX
302:the
238:the
181:.
158:the
137:or
121:– (
59:) (
451:)
443:.
356:)
325:)
261:)
192:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
63:)
447:(
352:(
321:(
257:(
188:(
184:—
125:)
119:)
81:(
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.