Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Santrex - Knowledge

Source 📝

237:
This article about a defunct webhost is currently sourced exclusively to what appears to be a blog. There has been some recent edit warring, which introduced a bunch of other unreliable and primary sources; in investigating the edit war, I spent some time searching for independent, reliable secondary
206: 318: 293: 268: 159: 200: 106: 91: 166: 86: 79: 17: 57: 221: 132: 127: 100: 96: 188: 136: 446: 40: 351: 119: 53: 407: 330: 305: 280: 255: 182: 442: 36: 410:
may apply to that? Regarding Santrex itself, I am seeing routine listings and user reviews but not the
178: 347: 214: 427: 398: 374: 355: 335: 310: 285: 260: 123: 61: 228: 322: 297: 272: 247: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
115: 67: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
369: 423: 415: 393: 239: 383: 406:: The blog posts discuss some malign uses to which this hosting service was put, but 243: 194: 411: 387: 386:
and references consists of interviews and supposed sponsored mentions that are not
153: 364: 419: 390: 346:, Agree and did the same but no reliable information in depth available. 435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
242:, but found nothing but primary sources, affiliated sources and 149: 145: 141: 213: 319:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 449:). No further edits should be made to this page. 317:Note: This discussion has been included in the 292:Note: This discussion has been included in the 267:Note: This discussion has been included in the 294:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 269:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 227: 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 316: 291: 266: 246:. Suggest deletion as best solution. 7: 363:couldn't find any reliable sources. 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 238:sources that would satisfy 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 466: 428:10:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 399:14:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 375:05:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 356:20:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 336:18:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 311:18:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 286:18:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 261:18:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 62:18:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 438:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 414:needed to demonstrate 382:does not pass through 80:Articles for deletion 54:Academic Challenger 338: 313: 288: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 457: 440: 328: 325: 303: 300: 278: 275: 253: 250: 232: 231: 217: 169: 157: 139: 77: 34: 465: 464: 460: 459: 458: 456: 455: 454: 453: 447:deletion review 436: 408:WP:NOTINHERITED 396: 372: 333: 326: 323: 308: 301: 298: 283: 276: 273: 258: 251: 248: 174: 165: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 463: 461: 452: 451: 431: 430: 401: 394: 377: 370: 358: 348:Elena Marcus D 340: 339: 331: 314: 306: 289: 281: 256: 235: 234: 171: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 462: 450: 448: 444: 439: 433: 432: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 402: 400: 397: 392: 389: 385: 381: 378: 376: 373: 368: 367: 362: 359: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 341: 337: 334: 329: 320: 315: 312: 309: 304: 295: 290: 287: 284: 279: 270: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 254: 245: 241: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 168: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 437: 434: 403: 379: 365: 360: 343: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 162: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 201:free images 416:notability 443:talk page 332:(blether) 307:(blether) 282:(blether) 257:(blether) 37:talk page 445:or in a 412:coverage 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 391:~ Amkgp 384:WP:CORP 207:WP refs 195:scholar 133:protect 128:history 116:Santrex 78:New to 68:Santrex 404:Delete 380:Delete 366:Antila 361:Delete 344:Delete 327:Summit 302:Summit 277:Summit 252:Summit 179:Google 137:delete 50:delete 420:AllyD 388:WP:RS 324:Girth 299:Girth 274:Girth 249:Girth 240:NCORP 222:JSTOR 183:books 167:Stats 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 424:talk 352:talk 215:FENS 189:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 244:UGC 229:TWL 158:– ( 426:) 418:. 395:💬 354:) 321:. 296:. 271:. 209:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 422:( 371:✉ 350:( 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 163:· 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Academic Challenger
talk
18:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Santrex

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Santrex
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.