Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Saskia de Brauw - Knowledge

Source 📝

643:À 29 ans, un Ăąge qui sonne bien souvent le glas d'une carriĂšre chez les tops, Saskia se fait trĂšs vite une place. En 2010, elle dĂ©file pour Balenciaga et Givenchy. Et tape dans l'Ɠil de Riccardo Tisci qui la propulse Ă©gĂ©rie de sa collection en 2011. Il l'aime tellement qu'elle dĂ©file Ă©galement pour sa collection homme. Dans la foulĂ©e, le crĂ©ateur italien la prĂ©sente Ă  Carine Roitfeld, alors patronne de « Vogue Paris ». SubjuguĂ©e par sa silhouette masculine, elle la prend sous son aile et lui consacre un numĂ©ro. Sa coupe Ă  la Jeanne d'Arc fait aussi son petit effet chez Chanel oĂč Karl Lagerfeld lui fait ouvrir et fermer son dĂ©filĂ© haute couture en 2011. En 2012, elle fait encore mieux : elle devient le nouveau visage de Chanel. Bref, une star est nĂ©e. (Tr: At 29, an age that often marks the end of a career with the tops, Saskia quickly carved out a place. In 2010, she walked for Balenciaga and Givenchy. And it catches the eye of Riccardo Tisci, who propels her as the face of his collection in 2011. He loves her so much that she also walks for her men's collection. In the process, the Italian designer presents it to Carine Roitfeld, then patron of "Vogue Paris". Captivated by her masculine figure, she takes it under her wing and devotes an issue to her. Her Joan of Arc cut also had an effect at Chanel, where Karl Lagerfeld had her open and close her haute couture show in 2011. In 2012, she did even better: she became the new face of Chanel. In short, a star is born.) 240:
In her case, campaigns for Armani, Chanel, Givenchy, Versace, etc.), and is seen as notable for having a great career “over 25” (Christ.) but it’s hard to find enough significant coverage to keep the actual article out of. I’ve seen things in Vogue and what not, but sadly it’s not sufficient
237:
The industry icons are models who have built stellar careers, they've snagged every cover, walked every show, booked every campaign, and lived to tell the tale. Before you can be a true supermodel, you have to become one of the industry's preferred stars and these girls are all bonafide
203: 491: 417: 490:
I didn’t ask you if AfD was cleanup. One of the many issue templates said that the article‘s only attribution was a primary source. I considered whether or not general notability was met.
412:: "When the Dutch artist and fashion model Saskia de Brauw first started traveling to New York for work, eight or so years ago, she found the city “a really overwhelming place.” NYtimes 360:
These sources barely substantiate the contents of the article (which had about 5 issue notices before I removed 3 of them). Net-a-porter, at the end of the day, is a clothing website.
164: 197: 235:
The problem is, she is a notable model in that she is considered an "industry icon" (not exactly a supermodel, but someone who has had longevity in the industry. Or
311: 271: 516: 512: 291: 111: 96: 335: 409: 468:, she meets WP:BASIC and citing just one source found by , she is clearly a notable model.. AfD is not cleanup, and clearly the inability of 413: 627: 375: 137: 132: 672:
Her androgynous look led to the project that perhaps best unites her artistic and modeling skills — the 2013 video for David Bowie's "
141: 383: 342:. The article needs a cleanup. I'm not sure how much of an art career she really has, but as a model there is a lot of coverage. 124: 420:: "Saskia de Brauw and Vincent van de Wijngaard Go Off the Grid With a Multimedia Project, Ghosts Don’t Walk in Straight Lines". 91: 84: 17: 218: 185: 374:
Then I guess we will need to have a shorter article. There are many, many sources out there. GNG is clearly established.
319: 299: 279: 62: 105: 101: 656: 600: 339: 697: 179: 40: 545: 425: 399: 347: 379: 604: 577: 573: 563: 549: 528: 524: 503: 481: 477: 456: 429: 403: 369: 351: 323: 315: 303: 295: 283: 275: 263: 175: 66: 58: 676:," in which she plays a disquieting gender-bending celebrity who eventually ends up taking Bowie's place. 693: 596: 391: 387: 36: 225: 559: 499: 452: 365: 259: 247: 128: 541: 465: 444: 421: 395: 343: 211: 569: 520: 473: 80: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
692:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
191: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
537: 515:, where clearly notable women are sometimes AfDed, as for example you recently also did at 250:) 14:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC) They seem to believe these sources do the job, so here is 555: 533: 519:. There is enough SIGCOV to show SdB is notable, as everyone else but you so far agrees. 508: 495: 469: 448: 361: 255: 243: 120: 72: 54: 158: 236: 688:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
416:: "A Walk Through Manhattan With Saskia de Brauw" Vogue 154: 150: 146: 210: 657:"Saskia de Brauw Comes Into Her Own With Art Book" 443:- based on the multiple reliable sources found by 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 700:). No further edits should be made to this page. 628:"Saint Laurent Paris : qui est Saskia de Brauw?" 310:Note: This discussion has been included in the 290:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 52:. Withdrawn by nominator with only keep !votes. 224: 8: 517:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Judith_Exner 513:Knowledge:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Women 334:I had no trouble finding in-depth coverage. 312:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions 272:list of Artists-related deletion discussions 112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 472:to find RS is not the same as failing GNG. 309: 292:list of Women-related deletion discussions 289: 269: 568:Yet so much SIGCOV remained invisible. 618: 655:Diderich, Joelle (January 25, 2016). 7: 24: 97:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 605:20:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 578:14:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC) 564:23:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 550:22:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 529:22:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 511:Like many others, I watchlist 504:22:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 482:21:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 457:19:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 430:17:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 404:17:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 370:17:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 352:17:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 324:17:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 304:17:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 284:17:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 264:19:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC) 67:00:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 674:The Stars (Are Out Tonight) 87:(AfD)? Read these primers! 717: 554:Did I not just say that? 690:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 595:per the sources found. 626:Pons, Sabrina (2012). 464:the many sources from 494:was all but useless. 85:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 661:Women's Wear Daily 316:AleatoryPonderings 296:AleatoryPonderings 276:AleatoryPonderings 59:AleatoryPonderings 326: 306: 286: 102:Guide to deletion 92:How to contribute 57: 708: 679: 678: 669: 667: 652: 646: 645: 640: 638: 623: 597:Arthistorian1977 239: 229: 228: 214: 162: 144: 82: 53: 34: 716: 715: 711: 710: 709: 707: 706: 705: 704: 698:deletion review 684: 683: 682: 665: 663: 654: 653: 649: 636: 634: 625: 624: 620: 171: 135: 121:Saskia de Brauw 119: 116: 79: 76: 73:Saskia de Brauw 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 714: 712: 703: 702: 681: 680: 647: 617: 616: 612: 610: 608: 607: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 542:ThatMontrealIP 531: 485: 484: 466:ThatMontrealIP 459: 445:ThatMontrealIP 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 422:ThatMontrealIP 406: 396:ThatMontrealIP 355: 354: 344:ThatMontrealIP 328: 327: 307: 287: 232: 231: 168: 115: 114: 109: 99: 94: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 713: 701: 699: 695: 691: 686: 685: 677: 675: 666:September 23, 662: 658: 651: 648: 644: 637:September 22, 633: 629: 622: 619: 615: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 591: 590: 579: 575: 571: 570:HouseOfChange 567: 566: 565: 561: 557: 553: 552: 551: 547: 543: 539: 536:did you do a 535: 532: 530: 526: 522: 521:HouseOfChange 518: 514: 510: 507: 506: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 486: 483: 479: 475: 474:HouseOfChange 471: 467: 463: 460: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 439: 438: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358: 357: 356: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 166: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 139: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 81: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 689: 687: 673: 671: 664:. Retrieved 660: 650: 642: 635:. Retrieved 631: 621: 613: 609: 592: 461: 440: 331: 251: 234: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 78: 49: 47: 31: 28: 198:free images 50:speedy keep 614:References 556:Trillfendi 534:Trillfendi 509:Trillfendi 496:Trillfendi 470:Trillfendi 449:Netherzone 362:Trillfendi 256:Trillfendi 244:Trillfendi 238:favorites. 694:talk page 540:on this? 538:WP:BEFORE 252:withdrawn 37:talk page 696:or in a 408:Nytimes 165:View log 106:glossary 39:or in a 632:Elle.fr 418:article 414:article 410:article 392:example 388:example 384:example 380:example 376:Example 340:example 336:Example 204:WP refs 192:scholar 138:protect 133:history 83:New to 176:Google 142:delete 241:here. 219:JSTOR 180:books 159:views 151:watch 147:links 16:< 668:2020 639:2020 601:talk 593:Keep 574:talk 560:talk 546:talk 525:talk 500:talk 492:This 478:talk 462:Keep 453:talk 441:Keep 426:talk 400:talk 366:talk 348:talk 332:Keep 320:talk 300:talk 280:talk 260:talk 248:talk 212:FENS 186:news 155:logs 129:talk 125:edit 63:talk 226:TWL 163:– ( 670:. 659:. 641:. 630:. 603:) 576:) 562:) 548:) 527:) 502:) 480:) 455:) 447:. 428:) 402:) 390:, 386:, 382:, 378:, 368:) 350:) 338:, 322:) 314:. 302:) 294:. 282:) 274:. 262:) 254:. 206:) 157:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 131:| 127:| 65:) 599:( 572:( 558:( 544:( 523:( 498:( 476:( 451:( 424:( 398:( 394:. 364:( 346:( 318:( 298:( 278:( 258:( 246:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 161:) 123:( 108:) 104:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
AleatoryPonderings
talk
00:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Saskia de Brauw

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Saskia de Brauw
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑