607:
scientific research social networks and compares them from four aspects: recommended projects, recommendation strategies, cold start solutions and user preference learning. ... Our country's
ScholarMate has a "Peer Expert" recommendation service. From its prompt "Experts recommended based on your personal information" you can clearly understand the role of this service, but the author has experienced it many times at many different times. After adjusting personal information for this time, the recommendation results always show "No qualified expert records"; the same problem also exists in the three recommended projects of "Discovery Group", "Academic Journal" and "Science Fund". This shows that the recommendation of friends of scientific research...""
472:
LinkedIn, ScholarMate collects personal research output through the
Internet and sets up an entry of unified access to all online academic information for all users. By creating a profile page on ScholarMate, researchers can manage publications, build links with friends and colleagues, recommend funding and career opportunities, as well as disseminate reseach outputs to increase impacts and citations. Lanched in August 2012, the website now has more than 20,000 registered users and the number is increasing."
523:
been low for a long time, suggesting that the users’ continuous use needs to be improved. Clarifying that users of academic social networking sites are motivated primarily by acquiring academic information, it defines the core value of academic social networking sites as helping to identify the most valuable content for users quickly and accurately through social relations. Based on this, corresponding countermeasures are put forward from three aspects: resources, information discovery and users."
432:
ScholarMate automatically collects scholarly related information about researchers’ output from multiple online resources. These resources include multiple online databases such as Scopus, one of the largest abstract and citation databases for peer-reviewed literature, including scientific journals, books, and conference proceedings. ScholarMate uses aggregated data to provide researchers with recommendations on relevant opportunities based on their profiles."
598:
and
Scholat, from four aspects of recommending item, recommending strategy, cold start scheme and user preference learning method. It finds that the recommender system of research social networking service of China has a obvious gap compared with foreign counterparts in above aspects. The problems
242:
The first source is the company's homepage, the second is of an affiliate, while the last two are dead links. Even worser, this site has virtually no news coverage and was created by a one-purpose account. Interestingly, if you look in the article creator's talk page, it was actually speedy deleted
522:
The abstract notes: "This paper conducts a case study of
ScholarMate, which is the earliest and the largest academic social networking site in China. The analysis results show that ScholarMate has a relatively accurate positioning and has formed a unique business model, but its user activation has
471:
The article notes: "ScholarMate (www.scholarmate.com) is another good example of dotcom companies playing a role in scolarly communication. ScholarMate is a professional research social network website whose aim is to promote research collaboration and information sharing. Inspired by
Facebook and
565:
From Google
Translate: "The article selects ResearchGate and China's "ScholarMate" as cases for comparative study and finds that there are some problems in the positioning, operation and development of China's academic social networks, such as the lack of global operation concepts and development
606:
From Google
Translate: "ScholarMate, officially launched in 2007, although smaller in scale than ResearchGate and Academia, currently has 2.5 million registered members... ScholarMate and Scholat are two typical scientific research social networks in my country. This article selects these four
431:
The article notes: "ScholarMate, a social research management tool launched in 2007 was used in 4 publications. It has more than 70,000 research groups created by researchers for their own projects, collaboration, and communication. As a platform for presenting publication research outputs,
602:
The article notes: "2007 年正式上线的科研之友，虽然规模要小于 ResearchGate 和 Academia，但目前注册会员也达到250万之多 ... 科研之友和学者 网则是我国两个典型的科研社交网络。本文选取这4 个科研社交网络，从推荐项目、推荐策略、冷启动方案 和用户偏好学习4个方面进行对比。... 我国的科研之友有一个“同行专家”推荐服务，从 其提示语“根据您的个人信息推荐的专家”可以清楚 地知道该服务的作用，但笔者在多个不同的时间经多 次调整个人信息，推荐结果始终显示“没有符合条件的 专家记录”;“发现群组”“学术期刊”“科学基金”这3
566:
positioning; user scale and user characteristics. The degree of internationalization is low and user stickiness is not enough; content production lacks effective incentive mechanisms and incentives. In response to these problems, some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward."
599:
include the fewer recommending items, insufficiency recommending strategies, poor effects of cold start, and weak abilities of user preference learning. Finally, it puts forwards some measures to solve these problems."
207:
164:
529:
354:
285:
201:
562:
The abstract notes: "文章选取Research Gate和我国"科研之友"等作为案例进行比较研究,发现我国学术社交网络在定位、运营与发展上存在一些问题,如缺失全球化的运营理念与发展定位;用户规模和用户的国际化程度较低且用户的黏性不够;内容生产缺乏有效的激励机制和激励手段等。针对这些问题,提出一些对策建议。"
309:
350:
289:
111:
96:
614:
392:
346:
281:
265:
in the article is a tagline from the products home page, so there is clearly some form of copypasta going on. More importantly, NN per nom
594:
The abstract notes: "This paper compares the recommender systems of four research social networking services of
ResearchGate, Academia,
483:
718:
375:
545:
330:: I can't find anything for this entity, there's another one with the same name using ChatGPT technology that pops up in searches.
137:
132:
91:
84:
17:
494:
141:
402:
Zhang, Zitong; Patra, Braja; Yaseen, Ashraf; Zhu, Jie; Sabharwal, Rachit; Roberts, Kirk; Cao, Tru; Wu, Hulin (2023-06-04).
634:
222:
705:
189:
124:
580:
168:
105:
101:
659:
630:
506:
764:
556:
40:
183:
415:
722:
370:
179:
36:
747:
726:
709:
684:
647:
380:
339:
321:
301:
274:
252:
66:
743:
626:
62:
335:
317:
229:
215:
735:
639:
443:
270:
462:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
759:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
701:
643:
618:
584:
537:
498:
452:
419:
359:
297:
248:
128:
760:
739:
588:
58:
502:
195:
670:
Relisting, we need assessment of whether new sources located help establish notability.
331:
313:
54:
541:
266:
158:
697:
293:
244:
120:
72:
424:
403:
465:
52:. Consensus for keep as GNG established with the addition of new sources.
675:
457:
438:
240:
All of the sources listed are affiliated with the site in some way.
482:
Zhang, Yaokun 张耀坤; Wu, Rui 吴瑞; Wang, Chaozhou 汪朝州 (January 2022).
755:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
662:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
571:
Liu, Xianhong 刘先红; Li, Gang 李纲 (2016). "科研社交网络的推荐系统对比分析" .
439:"Online scholarly publishing in China: Who? What? How?"
404:"Scholarly recommendation systems: a literature survey"
154:
150:
146:
214:
391:
per the significant coverage in multiple independent
673:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
627:Knowledge:Notability#General notability guideline
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
767:). No further edits should be made to this page.
530:"提高我国学术社交网络的国际传播能力——基于ResearchGate与"科研之友"等的比较研究"
345:Note: This discussion has been included in the
308:Note: This discussion has been included in the
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
310:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
228:
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
629:, which requires "significant coverage in
344:
307:
279:
456:
423:
495:Hunan Provincial Department of Education
589:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.09.016
437:Xu, Jie; Yuan, Xiaoqun (2013-04-01).
7:
503:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7845.2022.01.009
24:
542:10.16510/j.cnki.kjycb.2018.07.006
408:Knowledge and Information Systems
613:There is sufficient coverage in
349:lists for the following topics:
284:lists for the following topics:
97:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
685:23:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
648:12:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
603:个推荐项目也存在同样的问题。这说明科研之友的推 ...""
381:00:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
340:00:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
322:23:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
302:22:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
275:23:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
253:22:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
734:as the sources provided by
581:Chinese Academy of Sciences
484:"我国本土学术社交网络科研之友的个案分析：困境与对策"
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
784:
425:10.1007/s10115-023-01901-x
748:02:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
727:08:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
710:02:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
622:
557:Tsinghua University Press
536:(in Chinese) (7): 26–32.
478:Chinese-language sources:
398:English-language sources:
67:02:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
757:Please do not modify it.
572:
533:
490:
32:Please do not modify it.
528:Xu, Zhimin 许志敏 (2018).
738:establish notability.
617:to allow ScholarMate (
416:Springer-Verlag London
169:edits since nomination
85:Articles for deletion
59:The Herald (Benison)
238:Unnotable company.
55:(non-admin closure)
668:Relisting comment:
444:Learned Publishing
687:
383:
324:
304:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
775:
683:
672:
665:
663:
637:of the subject".
631:reliable sources
624:
615:reliable sources
592:
560:
554:
553:
544:. Archived from
520:
518:
517:
511:
505:. Archived from
488:
469:
460:
458:10.1087/20130205
429:
427:
393:reliable sources
378:
373:
366:
362:
347:deletion sorting
282:deletion sorting
263:Innovate Smarter
233:
232:
218:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
783:
782:
778:
777:
776:
774:
773:
772:
771:
765:deletion review
674:
658:
656:
574:
570:
551:
549:
535:
527:
515:
513:
509:
492:
486:
481:
436:
401:
376:
371:
364:
360:
175:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
781:
779:
770:
769:
751:
750:
729:
712:
696:: per Cunard.
690:
689:
671:
666:
652:
651:
612:
611:
610:
609:
575:(in Chinese).
568:
525:
493:(in Chinese).
476:
475:
474:
434:
385:
384:
342:
325:
305:
277:
236:
235:
172:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
780:
768:
766:
762:
758:
753:
752:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
730:
728:
724:
720:
716:
713:
711:
707:
706:contributions
703:
699:
695:
692:
691:
688:
686:
682:
680:
679:
669:
664:
661:
654:
653:
650:
649:
645:
641:
636:
632:
628:
620:
616:
608:
604:
600:
597:
590:
586:
582:
578:
569:
567:
563:
558:
548:on 2024-02-20
547:
543:
539:
531:
526:
524:
512:on 2024-02-20
508:
504:
500:
496:
485:
480:
479:
477:
473:
467:
464:
459:
454:
450:
446:
445:
440:
435:
433:
426:
421:
418:: 4446–4447.
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
399:
397:
396:
394:
390:
387:
386:
382:
379:
374:
369:
368:
367:
356:
352:
348:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
170:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
756:
754:
731:
717:per Cunard.
714:
693:
677:
676:
667:
657:
655:
638:
605:
601:
595:
593:
576:
564:
561:
550:. Retrieved
546:the original
521:
514:. Retrieved
507:the original
470:
448:
442:
430:
411:
407:
388:
363:
358:
327:
262:
258:
243:but remade.
239:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
736:User:Cunard
719:1.46.91.225
635:independent
596:Scholarmate
583:: 116–122.
261:The phrase
202:free images
121:ScholarMate
73:ScholarMate
740:Marquisate
625:) to pass
552:2024-02-20
516:2024-02-20
294:''Flux55''
245:''Flux55''
761:talk page
633:that are
466:0953-1513
451:(2): 93.
365:Quidditch
355:Hong Kong
332:Oaktree b
314:Shellwood
286:Companies
37:talk page
763:or in a
660:Relisted
267:MNewnham
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
619:Chinese
491:高校图书馆工作
351:Science
208:WP refs
196:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
698:voorts
640:Cunard
573:图书情报工作
555:– via
328:Delete
259:Delete
180:Google
142:delete
579:(9).
534:科技与出版
510:(PDF)
487:(PDF)
290:China
223:JSTOR
184:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
744:talk
732:Keep
723:talk
715:Keep
702:talk
694:Keep
644:talk
623:科研之友
463:ISSN
389:Keep
353:and
336:talk
318:talk
298:talk
288:and
271:talk
249:talk
216:FENS
190:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
585:doi
538:doi
532:.
499:doi
489:.
453:doi
420:doi
230:TWL
163:– (
746:)
725:)
708:)
681:iz
646:)
621::
577:60
497:.
461:.
449:26
447:.
441:.
414:.
412:65
410:.
406:.
361:WC
357:.
338:)
320:)
312:.
300:)
292:.
273:)
251:)
210:)
167:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
742:(
721:(
704:/
700:(
678:L
642:(
591:.
587::
559:.
540::
519:.
501::
468:.
455::
428:.
422::
395:.
377:✎
372:☎
334:(
316:(
296:(
269:(
247:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.