398:. If they "plan", that's something we all do. We can plan to lose weight. We can plan to tell our boss what we truly think of them. We can plan to visit Greece on holiday. But planning is not notable until a) it's achieved, and b) something important or notable or lasting happens as a result. If the SFP stand and the results are remarkable, notable or historic, then we can perhaps find a place in an article. But so far their record suggests otherwise, and it's only on past records, not future plans, that we should be hosting articles on Knowledge (XXG). Having a big website doesn't matter.
301:- I agree with the above and think this page should be deleted. The party has never held any elected representatives at any level of government and out of the two candidates they have stood have achieved less than 1% of the vote in both cases. This does not seem to be notable enough for a Knowledge (XXG) page.
240:
Political parties are not automatically notable by their creation. This party does not prove notability, only participation. Only has proof of receiving 465 votes and barely any notable coverage before or after general election. Knowledge (XXG) is not a
Gazetteer of Political Parties and this article
368:
This party is active, has a website and has stood candidates in elections. It plans to stand at least 8 candidates at the next
Scottish Parliament Elections. It has quite a big website for a party of it's size. I think that it will become even more notable by the 2021 Scottish Parliament Elections,
350:
Political parties like this are ten a penny in UK politics, which in my view overvalues them. When a non-notable failed candidate forms a non-notable party, and that party goes on to do pretty much nothing at the ballot box, we don't need an article about it. Ironically, "not notable" is the nicest
209:
369:
and deleting this page would just be counter-productive. Also, even if it isn't that notable, all the sources are reliable, it's completely neutral and meets the high standards of very good wikipedia pages.
258:
203:
278:
162:
94:
109:
169:
135:
130:
139:
122:
89:
82:
17:
224:
191:
103:
99:
426:
185:
40:
407:
378:
360:
342:
310:
290:
270:
250:
64:
126:
181:
231:
422:
356:
118:
70:
36:
395:
302:
403:
333:
306:
286:
266:
246:
217:
197:
374:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
352:
241:
does not prove that the content is any more than created to promote rather than describe.
399:
321:
282:
262:
242:
55:
389:
370:
156:
394:
Thanks Dylan. "It plans to stand at least 8 candidates..." runs against
417:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
152:
148:
144:
216:
230:
259:list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
429:). No further edits should be made to this page.
351:thing I can think of to say about this party. --
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
279:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
276:
256:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
1:
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
446:
419:Please do not modify it.
408:06:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
379:10:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
361:19:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
343:17:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
318:Failed political party.
311:13:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
291:08:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
271:08:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
251:08:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
65:12:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
119:Scottish Family Party
83:Articles for deletion
71:Scottish Family Party
340:
293:
273:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
437:
393:
341:
336:
330:
329:
324:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
445:
444:
440:
439:
438:
436:
435:
434:
433:
427:deletion review
406:
387:
334:
327:
322:
319:
289:
269:
249:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
443:
441:
432:
431:
413:
412:
411:
410:
402:
382:
381:
363:
345:
313:
295:
294:
285:
274:
265:
245:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
442:
430:
428:
424:
420:
415:
414:
409:
405:
401:
397:
391:
386:
385:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
367:
364:
362:
358:
354:
349:
346:
344:
339:
337:
326:
325:
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
418:
416:
365:
347:
331:
320:
315:
298:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
353:DanielRigal
204:free images
396:WP:CRYSTAL
58:Sandstein
423:talk page
303:Helper201
37:talk page
425:or in a
390:Dylan109
371:Dylan109
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
400:doktorb
335:chatter
283:doktorb
263:doktorb
243:doktorb
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
348:Delete
316:Delete
299:Delete
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
404:words
287:words
267:words
247:words
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
375:talk
366:Keep
357:talk
323:Nate
307:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
232:TWL
161:– (
377:)
359:)
309:)
281:.
261:.
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
392::
388:@
373:(
355:(
338:)
332:(
328:•
305:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.