572:
and the table of contents shows that they were written about in detail. Analyst reports are specifically mentioned as meeting the criteria for establishing notability. I also note that at least one other technology analyst firm, Forrester
Research, has also
471:
Personal attacks are pretty par for the course with AfDs and don't really matter. If you really want the article to be kept, instead of wasting everyone's time with useless crap go find some sources that actually meet the notability guidelines.
497:
mentions in local and global media, several awards and nominations, and some serious backing from the likes of SONY and KDDI. I honestly don't like whataboutism but take a look at the average company stub on
Knowledge...
203:
431:
Sources in the article, including the new ones, are trivial coverage that do not make the company notable. Neither does it being "quite innovative tech." - wonder why this is this anonymous...
334:
Company is notable. Reliable sourcing has been added and I am sure the article can be further improved with a little effort. Subject is of global significance. No reason to delete.--
197:
274:
293:
255:
156:
565:
312:
103:
88:
129:
124:
574:
133:
163:
546:
543:
116:
568:
but also includes information on the company. This is a weak reference but in my opinion meets the criteria. The most compelling reference is
569:
450:
348:
The nominator
Ninjaediator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. However, the nomination has some merit so I will leave this debate open.
557:
218:
185:
525:
437:
Above deletionists are apparently clueless about sourcing as well as trends in today's world (or perhaps have vested interests).
420:
416:
397:
83:
76:
17:
521:
179:
97:
93:
591:
507:
481:
462:
401:
369:
352:
343:
323:
304:
285:
266:
247:
58:
120:
175:
608:
365:
40:
225:
536:
Most of the sources within the article fail the criteria for establishing notability. References are either
380:
243:
360:
Featured in a PR laden article and a couple of listicles. nothing to show lasting coverage. Fails NCORP.
604:
112:
64:
54:
36:
549:
385:
361:
458:
412:
393:
339:
211:
191:
513:
499:
477:
564:- connected source). Two articles might meet the criteria. The first is an article commenting
517:
503:
316:
297:
278:
259:
239:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
603:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
561:
553:
442:
582:
235:
540:
493:
This article is about a company that brings new technology to the market, with plenty of
454:
446:
408:
389:
335:
586:
578:
473:
150:
537:
349:
379:
quite innovative tech, definitely more noteworthy than most companies here:
238:. Sources are user-generated. Written with the intention of promoting it.
438:
381:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Information_technology_company_stubs
599:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
577:. As such there are sufficient references and the topic passes
146:
142:
138:
210:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
611:). No further edits should be made to this page.
311:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
273:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
294:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
256:list of Software-related deletion discussions
224:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
313:list of Israel-related deletion discussions
383:
310:
291:
272:
253:
7:
451:Ben Gurion University of the Negev
24:
575:provided coverage of the company
89:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
453:do not cover "trivialities."--
1:
566:on their quirky company name
234:Not notable enough to pass
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
628:
601:Please do not modify it.
592:18:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
59:01:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
508:21:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
482:04:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
463:09:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
402:12:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
370:10:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
353:18:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
344:09:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
324:22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
305:22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
286:22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
267:22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
248:21:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
570:from Gartner Research
526:few or no other edits
421:few or no other edits
113:Secret Double Octopus
77:Articles for deletion
65:Secret Double Octopus
528:outside this topic.
423:outside this topic.
558:promotion by the VC
530:
529:
425:
424:
404:
388:comment added by
326:
307:
288:
269:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
619:
511:
510:
443:Business Insider
406:
405:
321:
302:
283:
264:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
74:
57:
34:
627:
626:
622:
621:
620:
618:
617:
616:
615:
609:deletion review
550:announcement(s)
362:MistyGraceWhite
317:
298:
279:
260:
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
625:
623:
614:
613:
595:
594:
531:
487:
486:
485:
484:
466:
465:
447:Jerusalem Post
432:
426:
373:
372:
355:
346:
328:
327:
308:
289:
270:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
624:
612:
610:
606:
602:
597:
596:
593:
590:
589:
584:
580:
576:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
535:
532:
527:
523:
519:
515:
509:
505:
501:
496:
492:
489:
488:
483:
479:
475:
470:
469:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
430:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
378:
375:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
354:
351:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
329:
325:
322:
320:
314:
309:
306:
303:
301:
295:
290:
287:
284:
282:
276:
271:
268:
265:
263:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
600:
598:
587:
533:
494:
490:
434:
428:
384:— Preceding
376:
357:
331:
319:CAPTAIN RAJU
318:
300:CAPTAIN RAJU
299:
281:CAPTAIN RAJU
280:
262:CAPTAIN RAJU
261:
240:Ninjaediator
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
524:) has made
419:) has made
198:free images
605:talk page
562:WP:ORGIND
560:(failing
554:WP:ORGIND
552:(failing
495:objective
409:NikkouSun
390:NikkouSun
37:talk page
607:or in a
588:HighKing
583:WP:NCORP
541:entirely
522:contribs
474:Adamant1
417:contribs
398:contribs
386:unsigned
236:WP:NCORP
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
547:funding
514:Ortamnu
500:Ortamnu
455:Geewhiz
439:Haaretz
435:Comment
336:Geewhiz
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
579:WP:GNG
429:Delete
358:Delete
176:Google
134:delete
556:) or
538:based
350:MER-C
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
534:Keep
518:talk
504:talk
491:Keep
478:talk
459:talk
449:and
413:talk
394:talk
377:Keep
366:talk
340:talk
332:Keep
244:talk
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
226:TWL
155:– (
585:.
544:on
520:•
512:—
506:)
480:)
472:--
461:)
445:,
441:,
415:•
407:—
400:)
396:•
368:)
342:)
315:.
296:.
277:.
258:.
246:)
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
581:/
516:(
502:(
476:(
457:(
411:(
392:(
364:(
338:(
242:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.