Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/SecurityScorecard - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

204: 358:(it talks about a standard transaction, namely "a capital transaction, such as raised capital"). Source 2 only mentions Security Scorecard with regard to something else, and Source 3 is a listicle. – 350:. As to the citations in the article: ArsTechnica is actually more reliable than TechCrunch (ArsTechnica is rated as generally reliable, while TechCrunch is rated as marginally reliable on 260: 161: 198: 284: 264: 93: 108: 256: 412:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
134: 129: 138: 121: 88: 81: 17: 305: 219: 186: 102: 98: 334: 437: 40: 165: 180: 420: 382: 367: 338: 310: 276: 248: 63: 176: 376: 125: 407: 226: 300: 36: 363: 355: 212: 403: 395: 58: 391: 347: 192: 330: 272: 244: 117: 77: 69: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
432:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
399: 320: 236: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
414:. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. 289: 351: 433: 410:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include 359: 415: 53: 268: 240: 354:). However, none of the three citations provide significant coverage. Source 1 is 155: 239:. Only the citation to TechCrunch would appear to be vaguely reliable. 428:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151: 147: 143: 211: 225: 375:per nom and the analysis conducted by Epicgenius. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 440:). No further edits should be made to this page. 283:Note: This discussion has been included in the 255:Note: This discussion has been included in the 285:list of New York-related deletion discussions 8: 235:Article fails to establish notability under 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 282: 254: 408:in-depth information *on the company* 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 346:as the article doesn't seem to meet 24: 390:This is a company therefore GNG/ 259:lists for the following topics: 94:Introduction to deletion process 394:requires at least two deep or 1: 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 457: 368:14:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 339:02:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 311:01:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 277:00:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 249:00:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 430:Please do not modify it. 421:17:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 383:19:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC) 64:00:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 166:edits since nomination 404:"Independent Content" 82:Articles for deletion 313: 279: 118:SecurityScorecard 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 70:SecurityScorecard 448: 379: 328: 308: 303: 296: 292: 257:deletion sorting 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 456: 455: 451: 450: 449: 447: 446: 445: 444: 438:deletion review 377: 324: 306: 301: 294: 290: 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 454: 452: 443: 442: 424: 423: 385: 370: 341: 319:: per nom and 314: 280: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 453: 441: 439: 435: 431: 426: 425: 422: 419: 418: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398:sources with 397: 393: 389: 386: 384: 381: 374: 371: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 340: 336: 332: 327: 322: 318: 315: 312: 309: 304: 299: 298: 297: 286: 281: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 429: 427: 416: 411: 387: 378:microbiology 372: 343: 325: 316: 293: 288: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 402:containing 400:each source 396:significant 199:free images 360:Epicgenius 356:WP:ORGTRIV 434:talk page 295:Quidditch 261:Companies 37:talk page 436:or in a 417:HighKing 406:showing 392:WP:NCORP 348:WP:NCORP 335:contribs 265:Software 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 326:''']''' 321:WP:NORG 269:Brandon 241:Brandon 237:WP:CORP 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 388:Delete 380:Marcus 373:Delete 352:WP:RSP 344:Delete 317:Delete 177:Google 139:delete 60:plicit 50:delete 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 364:talk 331:talk 273:talk 263:and 245:talk 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 227:TWL 160:– ( 52:‎. 366:) 337:) 333:• 323:. 291:WC 287:. 275:) 267:. 247:) 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 362:( 329:( 307:✎ 302:☎ 271:( 243:( 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
00:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
SecurityScorecard

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
SecurityScorecard
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.