400:-- lack of sigcov of more than one notable work. Happy to change my vote if someone discovers a ref that give a good description of his directing or acting. BTW, the article doesn't even say that he is an actor, so I deleted the assertion from the IB and categories. Is he? If so, the article should say so. And the refs should go immediately after the fact that they are verifying, rather than all lumped together. --
256:, but nothing else. Also, it appears he has only directed this one show, which received some coverage in RS. So, is merely directing one show enough to pass WP:NDIRECTOR? Seems like a very ROTM DIRECTOR to me. This also raises the question: if anyone just directs a drama and gets some press coverage on it, do they automatically qualify for a Knowledge (XXG) BLP?
322:, i am not a UPE, and don't get personal everytime by calling this term without any evidence as admin has already warned you multiple times. Secondly if it is a case of UPE, then why the article is stub and with that much less data. You can check history i never added material or promotional tone after creation.
325:
As to why i voted delete, I saw his work in a theatre and created his page after checking coverage in RS. Anyways, Did'nt even remembered him since then. Although he still has a coverage on reliable sources but i dont think theatre actor can have a wikipidea article & i am not a UPE who will be
204:
235:
So, the BLP claims the subject is a DIREVTOR, but it appears the only thing he's directed is some show called "Twins Apart" The issue I'm seeing is that the coverage about this show is mostly in The News,
347:
286:
161:
198:
351:
93:
241:
108:
369:
I didn't explicitly call you or anyone a UPE. I simply mentioned that only a UPE might create a BLP for a ROTM director, so no need to stress about it.
343:
134:
129:
88:
81:
17:
138:
245:
237:
121:
219:
102:
98:
186:
259:
No offense to the creator of this page, of course but only a UPE would bother creating a BLP for such a ROTM director. —
253:
425:
40:
384:
302:
272:
165:
252:, so at most, they count as one source. And I did find coverage on his show in other RS such as the Express Tribune
180:
409:
390:
360:
335:
308:
278:
176:
63:
125:
36:
226:
331:
117:
69:
212:
405:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
192:
250:
multiple publications from the same author or organization usually count as a single source
421:
378:
366:
327:
296:
266:
355:
401:
155:
372:
319:
290:
260:
54:
416:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
147:
143:
211:
225:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
342:Note: This discussion has been included in the
285:Note: This discussion has been included in the
287:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
341:
284:
249:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
346:lists for the following topics:
94:Introduction to deletion process
1:
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
445:
326:affected after deletion.
418:Please do not modify it.
410:03:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
391:23:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
361:20:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
336:20:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
309:19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
279:19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
64:22:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
166:edits since nomination
348:Actors and filmmakers
248:. And per WP:SIGCOV,
82:Articles for deletion
363:
311:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
436:
393:
387:
381:
375:
358:
344:deletion sorting
305:
299:
293:
275:
269:
263:
230:
229:
215:
159:
141:
79:
62:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
385:
379:
373:
370:
356:
303:
297:
291:
273:
267:
261:
172:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
395:
394:
364:
313:
312:
233:
232:
169:
118:Shah Sharabeel
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
70:Shah Sharabeel
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
392:
388:
382:
376:
368:
365:
362:
359:
353:
349:
345:
340:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
323:
321:
318:First of all
317:
310:
306:
300:
294:
288:
283:
282:
281:
280:
276:
270:
264:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
228:
224:
221:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
178:
175:
174:Find sources:
170:
167:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
415:
397:
396:
324:
315:
314:
258:
234:
222:
216:
208:
201:
195:
189:
183:
173:
75:
56:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
199:free images
367:Libraa2019
328:Libraa2019
422:talk page
357:Spiderone
254:like this
238:like this
37:talk page
424:or in a
402:Ssilvers
386:contribs
304:contribs
274:contribs
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
352:Theatre
205:WP refs
193:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
398:Delete
316:Delete
177:Google
139:delete
50:delete
374:Saqib
320:Saqib
292:Saqib
262:Saqib
220:JSTOR
181:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
406:talk
380:talk
350:and
332:talk
298:talk
268:talk
246:this
244:and
242:this
213:FENS
187:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
289:. —
227:TWL
160:– (
52:.
408:)
389:)
383:I
354:.
334:)
307:)
301:I
277:)
271:I
240:,
207:)
164:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
60:iz
404:(
377:(
371:—
330:(
295:(
265:(
231:)
223:·
217:·
209:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
179:(
171:(
168:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
57:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.