256:. I was going to say weak keep on the basis of being full professor and chair at Berkeley, which isn't really a strong argument for notability but is at least a clear pass for the "average professor test". But I'm upping my !vote after finding a review of her book with Zoll that called it "extremely important" (added to the article). I also added a sentence about her musical skills; while that doesn't really strengthen the case for her academic notability, at least it adds some color to her article which makes it seem more worth saving to me. —
203:
get them. "Dissertations approved" is a borderline category-- one puts it on CVs, and it does establish ones stature to have actually supervised other scholars, but they are not usually listed here. I have replaced them with a general statement. "Courses taught" is almost always superfluous. This is of interest within the university only , except in really special cases, such as
Feynman's introductory physics course at Caltech. I've removed these as well.
52:, Samir and Iridescenti note that department chair of a major university is a claim under criterion 1. David Epstein's !vote and contribution makes a claim under 2, and perhaps 3 and 4 as well. Ling.Nut, visiting from our friends at the Linguistics WikiProject, seems to make a claim under 4, and perhaps 2. While any one of these claims might be marginal, in combination this is a firm keep. -
202:
It's an interesting question how many works to list. For scientists, I check a citation index--either Web of
Science or Scopus, and include the most highly cited. This doesn't work well in other fields. But 7 publications seems a reasonable number, and the faculty web site is a reasonable place to
165:), but going by Google, she seems to have enough important specialist publications (no mainstream media mentions - unsurprising for something this specialised - but cited by MIT, Cambridge, Stanford etc); IMO passes
221:
270:. Few linguists are going to be more notable than a full professor at Berkeley. I think it would be great to solicit the opinion of some linguists on this nomination. --
117:
244:. Supervising PhD dissertations seems like it's just part of the job. I don't see anything else here that establishes any significant level of notability.
302:
Just finished writing a term paper with
Inkelas' name on every other page... Inkelas & Zoll, Morphological Doubling Theory. Try google scholar. :-)
124:
I removed the speedy deletion notice on this professor and chair of linguistics at
Berkeley. Being chair of a department at a major university meets
284:
161:
as chair of a major department at a major university. The laundry lists could probably safely go (and seem to have been cut-and-pasted from
90:
85:
17:
94:
77:
320:
36:
146:
319:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
306:
291:
274:
260:
248:
230:
209:
194:
184:
153:
145:
but because its contested it is more appropriate to bring it here, I cannot see any references so it fails
132:
59:
56:
150:
172:
53:
257:
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
241:
166:
125:
49:
142:
288:
271:
162:
227:
73:
65:
303:
245:
111:
129:
205:
313:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
128:
in my eyes, but I'm bringing it to AfD as a contested speedy --
240:. Being a department chair doesn't seem sufficient to satisfy
287:
asking for expert opinions on this researcher's work. --
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
222:list of Academics and educators-related deletions
323:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
220:: This debate has been included in the
285:Wikipedia_Talk:WikiProject Linguistics
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
163:her entry on the Berkeley website
1:
147:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
340:
316:Please do not modify it.
307:04:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
292:05:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
60:06:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
275:16:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
261:07:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
249:15:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
231:17:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
210:04:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
195:17:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
154:16:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
133:16:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
283:Just placed a note on
141:Could be covered by
225:
191:
331:
318:
216:
193:
190:
185:
182:
177:
169:under criteria 1
151:The Sunshine Man
115:
97:
34:
339:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
329:
328:
327:
321:deletion review
314:
186:
178:
173:
170:
88:
72:
69:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
337:
335:
326:
325:
297:
296:
295:
294:
278:
277:
264:
263:
258:David Eppstein
251:
234:
233:
213:
212:
197:
156:
122:
121:
74:Sharon Inkelas
68:
66:Sharon Inkelas
63:
48:. Looking at
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
336:
324:
322:
317:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
301:
293:
290:
289:Myke Cuthbert
286:
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
273:
272:Myke Cuthbert
269:
266:
265:
262:
259:
255:
252:
250:
247:
243:
239:
236:
235:
232:
229:
223:
219:
215:
214:
211:
208:
207:
201:
198:
196:
192:
189:
188:(talk to me!)
183:
181:
176:
168:
164:
160:
157:
155:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
315:
312:
299:
298:
267:
253:
237:
217:
204:
199:
187:
179:
174:
158:
138:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
228:Pete.Hurd
304:Ling.Nut
118:View log
246:fbb_fan
242:WP:PROF
167:WP:PROF
126:WP:PROF
91:protect
86:history
50:WP:PROF
238:Delete
175:irides
139:Delete
95:delete
54:Banyan
180:centi
130:Samir
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
300:Keep
268:Keep
254:Keep
218:Note
200:keep
159:Keep
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
57:Tree
46:keep
226:--
224:.
206:DGG
171:—
116:– (
143:A7
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
149:.
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.