409:; while it would be fallacy to suggest this warrants an article for every recipient, it may suggest that those named are not always of an "up and coming" variety. It's also arguable that the "Prince of Alexandria" profile in Scene magazine and the first Deadline article cited tend toward being substantial, as opposed to passing or trivial mentions. Taken together, these sources might establish notability. I am also not seeing guidance to suggest that we tend to delete articles about film producers in the
401:- I can see where many of the concerns are coming from. I have amended the reference for the Variety line to one which more directly and substantially addresses the subject; the honor itself also suggests a level of recognition by industry peers, as the recipients are chosen via industry submissions which are then curated by Variety's reporters and critics. Additionally, articles exist for other recent recipients, such as
481:
My understanding is that, while an executive producer credit can indicate varying degrees of involvement, a producer/produced by credit (such as many of those here) is traditionally understood in the industry to indicate one of the main, actually hands-on producers of a project, which is why they are
465:
Most films that are created now have multiple producers so the producer may not be particularly notable, even though they are attached to a famous film with famous actors. As always secondary sources that are of a sufficient depth of coverage are the standard to prove notability. Here there is a lot
539:#3 or such. PS. If it was one or two items, I'd agree with the nom, but if he is linked as producer or such to something like ten blue links, that's probably on the keep side of borderline, at least for me. Ping me if you want to convince me otherwise, I am always open to discussion. --
582:
I am not seeing anything beyond what is there, as I said, it is just my personal view of what to do in borderline cases - in this one, I think there's enough stuff he had his name in as credits etc. that he probably should have an entry. A weak argument, hence my weak keep vote.
209:
304:
567:
Do you fancy looking for some additional evidence. I really don't mind withdrawing it, if you give me an inkling of summat. I don't want him deleted if there is inkling that he is notable.
162:
323:
285:
413:
article. Given the fairly extensive credits of the subject, it's likely that further sources could be added in order to bring the article to its full potential, as well.
203:
342:
266:
94:
109:
169:
535:. The coverage of him is sparse, but he was a writer/director for many items, and a good half of them are blue links. That suggests he may pass
449:
135:
130:
89:
82:
17:
139:
466:
of name drops, some minor coverage, a single primary source (an interview) but no real secondary sources of depth. Not a thing.
122:
224:
103:
99:
191:
504:
431:
633:
40:
185:
453:
381:
600:
I've not found much either. It is really all in the article and its not sufficient to establish notability.
610:
595:
577:
551:
525:
491:
476:
456:
422:
393:
353:
334:
315:
296:
277:
258:
181:
64:
445:
536:
629:
36:
410:
369:
231:
217:
126:
377:
245:
589:
545:
487:
441:
418:
389:
346:
327:
308:
289:
270:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
628:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
365:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
603:
570:
469:
251:
197:
241:
516:
118:
70:
55:
585:
562:
541:
483:
414:
385:
156:
406:
402:
624:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
507:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
434:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
305:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
248:. Presented references are name drops. Nothing of depth.
482:
so coveted and one sees so few of them on a given film.
152:
148:
144:
216:
440:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
513:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
230:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
636:). No further edits should be made to this page.
341:Note: This discussion has been included in the
322:Note: This discussion has been included in the
303:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
324:list of Television-related deletion discussions
286:list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
340:
321:
302:
283:
264:
372:articles about producers. His listing in
343:list of Film-related deletion discussions
267:list of Ohio-related deletion discussions
586:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
542:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
368:sales person and film producer.
95:Introduction to deletion process
394:15:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
354:22:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
335:22:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
316:22:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
297:22:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
278:22:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
259:21:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
611:18:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
596:03:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
578:00:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
492:00:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
65:17:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
552:05:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
526:18:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
477:23:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
457:10:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
423:03:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
653:
384:variety, pardon the pun.
626:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
83:Articles for deletion
528:
524:
459:
370:We tend to delete
356:
337:
318:
299:
280:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
644:
608:
606:
592:
575:
573:
566:
548:
523:
521:
514:
512:
510:
508:
474:
472:
439:
437:
435:
351:
332:
313:
294:
275:
256:
254:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
640:
634:deletion review
604:
602:
594:
590:
571:
569:
560:
550:
546:
529:
517:
515:
503:
501:
470:
468:
460:
430:
428:
411:common outcomes
366:run of the mill
347:
328:
309:
290:
271:
252:
250:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
639:
638:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
584:
555:
554:
540:
511:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
438:
427:
426:
425:
396:
380:and is of the
358:
357:
338:
319:
300:
281:
238:
237:
174:
119:Shaun Sanghani
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
71:Shaun Sanghani
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
637:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
612:
609:
607:
599:
598:
597:
593:
587:
581:
580:
579:
576:
574:
564:
559:
558:
557:
556:
553:
549:
543:
538:
534:
531:
530:
527:
522:
520:
509:
506:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
478:
475:
473:
464:
463:
462:
461:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
436:
433:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:up-and-coming
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
359:
355:
352:
350:
344:
339:
336:
333:
331:
325:
320:
317:
314:
312:
306:
301:
298:
295:
293:
287:
282:
279:
276:
274:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
255:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
625:
623:
601:
568:
537:WP:NCREATIVE
532:
518:
502:
467:
442:filelakeshoe
429:
398:
373:
361:
349:CAPTAIN RAJU
348:
330:CAPTAIN RAJU
329:
311:CAPTAIN RAJU
310:
292:CAPTAIN RAJU
291:
273:CAPTAIN RAJU
272:
249:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
605:scope_creep
572:scope_creep
471:scope_creep
407:Nancy Grant
403:Xavier Gens
253:scope_creep
204:free images
591:reply here
547:reply here
519:Sandstein
378:in passing
58:Sandstein
630:talk page
533:Weak keep
246:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
632:or in a
505:Relisted
432:Relisted
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
563:Piotrus
484:Stm2193
415:Stm2193
386:Bearian
374:Variety
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
362:Delete
242:WP:BIO
240:Fails
182:Google
140:delete
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
488:talk
419:talk
405:and
399:Keep
390:talk
244:and
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
376:is
232:TWL
161:– (
583:--
490:)
454:🐱
452:)
448:/
421:)
392:)
364:-
345:.
326:.
307:.
288:.
269:.
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
588:|
565::
561:@
544:|
486:(
450:c
446:t
444:(
417:(
388:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.