Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Silig - Knowledge

Source 📝

332:- no prejudice against redirect/merge. Barring in-depth discussion in some undisclosed source, there is no evidence that he is a notable historical figure; it seems as though he was a guard commander, which is not enough unless, again, there are sources which discuss his significance. That seems unlikely since his character is known only thanks to a single artifact. 374:
follows a discussion of Turks in Sassania in general and speculation as to which group of Turks the man might have belonged. I don't see much more that can be added to the article. To be honest there are more compelling grounds for an article on the ring than there is on the man. I'd be interested to read any other sources -
433:
somewhere. My preferred redirect target would be something related to king XUSRŌ I. The truth is that we KNOW nothing about him except his name and position, so that there is no scope for expanding the article other than by original research (i.e. hoax /invention. I have not read the article, but
373:
requires "significant coverage in reliable sources". I've read the journal article, the first three pages are about an old, mistaken interpretation of the engraving on the ring. On the next page we learn that Silig is a Turkic name and that he was commander of the guard of the royal tent. There
312:
Anecdotally, this ring, and other pieces of evidence has been used to push iranian/pan-turanist claims to Azerbaijan's history as either a turkicist or an iranian territory, at least from what my iranian friends tell me. However, I'm having difficulty finding any RS on this topic, and given that I
395:—Silig has no significant coverage, nor did it radically change our understanding of Turks in the Persian Empire. Silig was not an important historical figure or archaeological discovery. I would argue deleting this if the lead BrxBrx has goes nowhere. -- 497:: Completely fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO, NSOLDIER. Their is no SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. Sources provided about the ring and inscription do not provide SIGCOV about the subject. 229:
A 6th-century Sasanian known only from an inscription found on a ring. The article on the find contains little more about the man and I couldn't find much else to satisfy WP:GNG. Possible candidate to merge to
313:
don't speak persian or turkish, I can't confirm this. I've put a note on wikiproject iran, if any persian speaking wikipedians can chime in, lmk if my friends are full of bs, or if this is indeed substantiated.
198: 159: 348:
There are no guidelines that state how many sources about a said person is required to make a article about them. There is an academic source of 7 pages about him named
291: 271: 251: 192: 106: 91: 86: 79: 17: 434:
my guess is that this is a discussion of the context, which would be better included in an article on his royal master.
400: 100: 96: 213: 452: 413: 231: 180: 544: 333: 132: 127: 40: 136: 523: 439: 357: 396: 119: 519: 540: 505: 485: 36: 174: 206: 170: 435: 353: 123: 527: 510: 489: 470: 443: 425: 404: 383: 361: 340: 322: 303: 283: 263: 243: 61: 466: 421: 379: 299: 279: 259: 239: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
539:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
220: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
501: 481: 318: 57: 115: 67: 370: 462: 417: 375: 295: 275: 255: 235: 186: 153: 314: 53: 352:, which is more than enough information to add in the article. -- 535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
455:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
416:
Content definitely warrants a mention in said article.
149: 145: 141: 205: 461:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 547:). No further edits should be made to this page. 290:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 250:Note: This discussion has been included in the 292:list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions 272:list of Military-related deletion discussions 219: 8: 252:list of History-related deletion discussions 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 350:A TURK OFFICER OF THE SĀSĀNIAN KING XUSRŌ I 289: 269: 249: 7: 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 528:10:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC) 511:12:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC) 490:09:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 471:06:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 234:, the location of the find - 62:22:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 444:12:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC) 426:01:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 405:20:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC) 384:21:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 362:19:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 341:18:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 323:18:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 304:18:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 284:18:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 264:18:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 244:18:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 564: 537:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 518:No SIGCOV; fails GNG. 80:Articles for deletion 336:‡ Єl Cid of Valencia 473: 397:Lord Dweebington1 306: 286: 266: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 555: 509: 460: 458: 456: 431:Keep or redirect 338: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 563: 562: 558: 557: 556: 554: 553: 552: 551: 545:deletion review 498: 474: 451: 449: 334: 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 561: 559: 550: 549: 531: 530: 520:Zin Win Hlaing 513: 492: 459: 448: 447: 446: 428: 414:Üçtəpə,_Goygol 407: 389: 388: 387: 386: 365: 364: 343: 326: 325: 307: 287: 267: 232:Üçtəpə, Goygol 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 560: 548: 546: 542: 538: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 514: 512: 508: 507: 503: 496: 493: 491: 487: 483: 482:— Alalch Emis 479: 476: 475: 472: 468: 464: 457: 454: 445: 441: 437: 436:Peterkingiron 432: 429: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 408: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 390: 385: 381: 377: 372: 369: 368: 367: 366: 363: 359: 355: 354:HistoryofIran 351: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 331: 328: 327: 324: 320: 316: 311: 308: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 265: 261: 257: 253: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 233: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 536: 534: 515: 499: 494: 477: 450: 430: 409: 392: 349: 345: 335: 329: 309: 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 193:free images 480:Fails GNG 541:talk page 37:talk page 543:or in a 453:Relisted 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 502:Timothy 478:Delete. 463:Natg 19 418:Pladica 393:Delete. 376:Dumelow 310:Comment 296:Dumelow 276:Dumelow 256:Dumelow 236:Dumelow 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 516:Delete 495:Delete 371:WP:GNG 330:Delete 315:BrxBrx 171:Google 137:delete 54:Daniel 50:delete 410:Merge 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 116:Silig 68:Silig 16:< 524:talk 506:talk 486:talk 467:talk 440:talk 422:talk 401:talk 380:talk 358:talk 346:Keep 319:talk 300:talk 280:talk 260:talk 240:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 504::: 500:// 412:to 221:TWL 158:– ( 526:) 488:) 469:) 442:) 424:) 403:) 382:) 360:) 321:) 302:) 294:. 282:) 274:. 262:) 254:. 242:) 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 522:( 484:( 465:( 438:( 420:( 399:( 378:( 356:( 317:( 298:( 278:( 258:( 238:( 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Daniel
talk
22:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Silig

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Silig
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.