535:, but qualified as follows. Doing a search for sources, I see a whole lot on the following websites< yen.com.gh, ghanaweb.com, modernghana.com, and pulse.com.gh. Some others on newsghana.com.gh, ghanamusic.com, ghanamotion.com, and some others. I'm mentioning domains rather than links to particulars because there are dozens and dozens of articles on these sites, so easy to find. The big question is how reliable they are, and I can't say I'm familiar apart from seeing them come up in other Ghana-related articles. Ghanaweb.com is the most popular website in ghana after Google and YouTube, and Yen.com.gh is certainly up there. That speaks to prominence, not reliability, though. There are enough of these, that I'm willing to err on the side of considering them reliable at this point, pending evidence to the contrary. —
678:
anything. I suppose I'll have to look elsewhere for context about these sources. You may ultimately be right, but, ahem, "you have failed to show me" why the sources which discuss the subject or her music are unreliable apart from waving them off as "promotional links". (I'm not going to arbitrarily link to some -- they are littered around those sites mentioned above, as you've no doubt seen). This will be my last post unless I find (or read here) additional information. —
699:
You're wrong to think that a website is reliable simply because they are one of their country's most popular websites. I asked you to tell me which sources in the article you consider reliable and you've failed to do that. I am going to breakdown all of the article's sources since you are not satisfy
621:
Let me ask you specifically. Can you tell me which sources in the article are notable? All of the sources in the article are promotional links or press release info about the subject's music. None of them discusses the subject's music. Show me sources that critically reviewed her songs. I am awaiting
703:
The first source is inaccessible; it is an unreliable self-published blog source powered by
Wordpress. The website reads "We bring you the best Premium WordPress Themes that perfect for news, magazine, personal blog, etc. Check our landing page for details." Can you please tell me how exactly do you
677:
Wrong about what? That my !vote, which conditions a keep on the reliability of the many sources that are available? Rather than bludgeon, you could add some context about why you say these sources are not reliable. You're not obliged to, of course; just like I'm not obliged to try to persuade you of
759:
After analyzing all of the sources, the subject's only claim to notability is her multiple nominations at the VGMAs. One brief secondary coverage of her (sorce 8) and her two nominations at the VGMA are not enough to warrant a separate article. To retierate, she doesn't meet any of the criterion
248:. Majority the references cited in the article are promotional links to the subject's music. The remaining sources are interviews. A Google search of the subject does not show her being discussed in reliable sources. All of the awards and nominations she has received are not notable.
600:, which was poorly attended so certainly not a clear consensus, but what's there leaned towards ghanaweb being ok. PS: adding a ping after writing a comment doesn't do anything. For a ping to create a notification, it has to be accompanied by a new signature on a new line. —
590:
Any response about the amount of coverage something has received is talking about the GNG (significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject). You say "having promotional links". These are not links. They're articles in those sources. I'm not interested in
411:
search index and I realized that presumption should not be relevant to this discussion and also acknowledged that the Google might not be reliable when searching about this person. Of course I earlier mentioned that the article lacks reliable secondary sources.
809:, You need one criteria to pass for notability. I mentioned earlier that she has received two nominations in a major award. Does that not count? Further to that, I have added two more sources "peacefmonline.com" and "myjoyonline.com" which passes for
508:
Which criterion of WP:GNG does she pass? The
Ghanaweb and Modernghana sources cited in the article are not independent of the subject. The two nominations she received at the 2020 VGMAs aren't enough to warrant a separate article.
658:
This is where you're wrong here. You have failed to show me sources that discuss the subject or her music. You claim that those sources are reliable and I'm telling you they are promotional links and press releases.
595:
arguments, so let's focus on the sources, because indeed, if those sources are not reliable, GNG is not met. On what basis are you saying they're unreliable? A search through RSN for ghanaweb returned just this
209:
269:
887:
and persisting in doing so can lead to sanctions (preventing you from participating at all). That's not a threat; just letting you know. This is more about arguments than votes. Just write
569:
597:
203:
568:? Having promotional links on Ghanaweb.com and Yen.com.gh doesn't mean anything. All acts in Ghana have promotional links on these sites, including the ones whose
162:
735:
The sixth source is simply Kofi
Kinaata's endorsement of her song "YiWani". The song fails WP:NSONG and the source cannot be used to establish its notability.
317:
293:
109:
855:
94:
751:
Sources 12 through 17, 19 through 22, 24, 29 through 34, and 36 through 41 are all links to her YouTube videos; sources 18 and 35 are inaccessible.
854:
Of course people are allowed to express their opinions but
Kwamevaughan has a tendency of voting multiple times in AFD discussion. Take a look at
714:
The third source is another interview; interview sources cannot be used to establish notability because they are not reliable secondary coverage.
754:
Sources 26, 27 and 28 are about her nominations at the 3Music Awards and the
Vodafone Ghana Music Awards; only the latter award is notable.
169:
831:
Duplicate vote was struck. I've edited it to only strike the bolded !vote, since people can express an opinion in multiple places. —
89:
82:
17:
479:
as she has been nominated for a major award (VGMA) in the country. ~ the source "ghanaweb.com" , "modernghana.com" passes for
407:
Sorry that was a careless blunder of mine because I presumed it to be notable because of the wide coverage of the subject in
135:
130:
139:
224:
977:
191:
644:). The question is whether they're reliable. If you've nothing to add to clear that up, my !vote stands as written. —
122:
103:
99:
956:
929:
349:
and the subject has wide coverage. The only issue is with the sources which needs more reliable secondary sources.
1000:
40:
707:
The second source is a radio interview she granted to Abusua FM, talking about her song "Jeje". The song fails
185:
910:
905:
My bad. I had the impression I needed to do that when contesting in afd. This is noted henceforth. Thanks
818:
488:
463:
996:
869:
779:
670:
633:
583:
520:
388:
331:
307:
283:
259:
36:
181:
983:
947:
914:
900:
871:
840:
822:
781:
687:
672:
653:
635:
609:
585:
544:
522:
492:
467:
446:
421:
390:
358:
333:
309:
285:
261:
64:
884:
592:
943:
893:
849:
833:
694:
680:
646:
616:
602:
555:
537:
217:
231:
806:
765:
565:
455:
245:
906:
878:
814:
503:
484:
459:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
995:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
883:
One bolded !vote per person. Add as many comments as you want, but adding multiple !votes is
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
972:
859:
769:
660:
623:
573:
510:
442:
417:
402:
378:
354:
321:
297:
273:
249:
730:
promotional site where artists can choose a promo package and upload their music for promo
708:
126:
197:
939:
721:
The fourth source is simply an announcment about her song "Jeje". Ghanamotion.com is a
55:
761:
745:
The eight source is a mixture of quotes from an interview and some secondary content.
715:
561:
476:
430:
374:
346:
241:
810:
480:
434:
738:
The seventh source is inaccessible. Ameyaw Debrah is a blogger and his website is
156:
967:
438:
413:
368:
350:
118:
70:
748:
Sources 9, 10 and 11 are interview sources that are not independent of her.
722:
729:
408:
739:
723:
promotional platform that provides advertising services to artists
728:
The fifth source is inaccessible; Ghanaxclusives.com is simply a
640:
Notability is irrelevant to the sources (and several of them are
991:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
959:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
932:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
377:
does she pass and where are the reliable secondary sources?
270:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
152:
148:
144:
216:
965:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
938:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1003:). No further edits should be made to this page.
483:. I have add the stub tag to better improve it.
316:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
230:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
318:list of Ghana-related deletion discussions
315:
294:list of Women-related deletion discussions
291:
267:
711:and the source isn't independent of her.
858:from March 2018; he voted three times.
7:
458:& general notability guidelines.
240:The subject of this article fails
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
700:with the statements I've made.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
704:consider this source reliable?
1:
740:simply a promotional platform
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1020:
948:09:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
915:14:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
901:14:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
872:14:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
841:14:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
823:11:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
782:00:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
688:23:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
673:16:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
654:14:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
636:14:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
610:14:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
586:07:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
570:articles have been deleted
545:02:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
523:10:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
493:07:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
468:14:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
447:13:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
422:13:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
391:12:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
359:08:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
334:00:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
310:00:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
286:00:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
262:00:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
993:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
984:10:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
65:19:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
475:- The musician passes
718:clearly states this.
83:Articles for deletion
891:instead of keep. —
373:Which criterion of
856:this AFD discssion
560:How does she meet
429:The subject fails
986:
950:
336:
312:
288:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
1011:
982:
964:
962:
960:
937:
935:
933:
898:
896:
882:
867:
853:
838:
836:
777:
698:
685:
683:
668:
651:
649:
631:
620:
607:
605:
581:
559:
542:
540:
518:
507:
406:
386:
372:
329:
305:
281:
257:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1001:deletion review
987:
966:
955:
953:
951:
928:
926:
894:
892:
876:
860:
847:
834:
832:
770:
692:
681:
679:
661:
647:
645:
624:
622:your response.
614:
603:
601:
574:
553:
538:
536:
511:
501:
400:
379:
366:
322:
298:
274:
250:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1017:
1015:
1006:
1005:
963:
952:
936:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
895:Rhododendrites
850:Rhododendrites
844:
843:
835:Rhododendrites
826:
825:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
757:
756:
755:
752:
749:
746:
743:
736:
733:
726:
719:
712:
705:
695:Rhododendrites
682:Rhododendrites
648:Rhododendrites
617:Rhododendrites
604:Rhododendrites
556:Rhododendrites
548:
547:
539:Rhododendrites
528:
527:
526:
525:
496:
495:
470:
449:
424:
394:
393:
363:
362:
338:
337:
313:
289:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1016:
1004:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
988:
985:
981:
980:
976:
975:
971:
970:
961:
958:
949:
945:
941:
934:
931:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:
902:
897:
890:
886:
880:
875:
874:
873:
870:
868:
866:
865:
857:
851:
846:
845:
842:
837:
830:
829:
828:
827:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
801:
800:
783:
780:
778:
776:
775:
767:
763:
758:
753:
750:
747:
744:
741:
737:
734:
731:
727:
724:
720:
717:
713:
710:
706:
702:
701:
696:
691:
690:
689:
684:
676:
675:
674:
671:
669:
667:
666:
657:
656:
655:
650:
643:
639:
638:
637:
634:
632:
630:
629:
618:
613:
612:
611:
606:
599:
594:
593:WP:OTHERSTUFF
589:
588:
587:
584:
582:
580:
579:
571:
567:
563:
557:
552:
551:
550:
549:
546:
541:
534:
530:
529:
524:
521:
519:
517:
516:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
423:
419:
415:
410:
404:
399:
396:
395:
392:
389:
387:
385:
384:
376:
370:
365:
364:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
335:
332:
330:
328:
327:
319:
314:
311:
308:
306:
304:
303:
295:
290:
287:
284:
282:
280:
279:
271:
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
258:
256:
255:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
992:
990:
978:
973:
968:
954:
927:
907:Kwamevaughan
888:
879:Kwamevaughan
863:
861:
815:Kwamevaughan
802:
773:
771:
760:outlined in
664:
662:
641:
627:
625:
577:
575:
532:
514:
512:
504:Kwamevaughan
485:Kwamevaughan
472:
460:Celestina007
451:
426:
397:
382:
380:
342:
341:
325:
323:
301:
299:
277:
275:
253:
251:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
807:WP:MUSICBIO
766:WP:MUSICBIO
566:WP:MUSICBIO
456:WP:MUSICBIO
403:Versace1608
345:She passes
246:WP:MUSICBIO
204:free images
885:disruptive
433:and fails
119:Sista Afia
71:Sista Afia
58:Sandstein
997:talk page
940:Sulfurboy
37:talk page
999:or in a
957:Relisted
930:Relisted
709:WP:NSONG
531:Leaning
454:— Fails
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
889:Comment
862:Versace
772:Versace
663:Versace
642:notable
626:Versace
598:one hit
576:Versace
513:Versace
398:Comment
381:Versace
324:Versace
300:Versace
276:Versace
252:Versace
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
805:- Per
762:WP:GNG
716:WP:GNG
562:WP:GNG
477:WP:GNG
452:Delete
439:Abishe
431:WP:GNG
427:Delete
414:Abishe
409:Google
375:WP:GNG
369:Abishe
351:Abishe
347:WP:GNG
242:WP:GNG
182:Google
140:delete
811:WP:RS
481:WP:RS
435:WP:RS
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
974:uidh
944:talk
911:talk
864:1608
819:talk
803:Keep
774:1608
764:and
665:1608
628:1608
578:1608
564:and
533:Keep
515:1608
489:talk
473:Keep
464:talk
443:talk
418:talk
383:1608
355:talk
343:Keep
326:1608
302:1608
278:1608
254:1608
244:and
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
899:\\
839:\\
813:.
686:\\
652:\\
608:\\
543:\\
232:TWL
161:– (
946:)
913:)
821:)
768:.
572:.
491:)
466:)
445:)
437:.
420:)
357:)
320:.
296:.
272:.
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
979:e
969:b
942:(
909:(
881::
877:@
852::
848:@
817:(
742:.
732:.
725:.
697::
693:@
619::
615:@
558::
554:@
506::
502:@
487:(
462:(
441:(
416:(
405::
401:@
371::
367:@
353:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.