370:
a notable political office, not just running for one. To be notable enough for inclusion here, an unsuccessful candidate must either (a) already have preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten them an article anyway, or (b) be referenceable to such an unusual depth and
375:
than everybody else's candidacies. But this is referenced 75 per cent to an indiscriminate and unreliable directory of political candidates, which is not support for notability at all, and the few sources that are real media coverage do not add up to
206:
159:
262:
200:
282:
106:
91:
166:
132:
127:
136:
366:. People do not get Knowledge articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at NPOL is
86:
79:
17:
119:
221:
188:
100:
96:
473:
423:
40:
182:
57:
456:
427:
410:
389:
358:
339:
314:
294:
274:
254:
178:
61:
469:
436:
123:
36:
419:
350:
228:
440:
214:
115:
67:
310:
290:
270:
250:
53:
452:
406:
385:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
468:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
194:
335:
398:
371:
range and volume of media coverage that he has a credible claim to his candidacy being
327:
242:
444:
323:
306:
286:
266:
246:
245:. Political candidates do not get Knowledge articles as party nominees for office. –
238:
448:
402:
381:
153:
331:
464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
418:
perenial failure candidates are over and over not notable.
149:
145:
141:
213:
380:
media coverage to make his candidacy a special case.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
476:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
227:
8:
347:Fails GNG though could pass in the future. ~
283:list of Arizona-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
280:
260:
397:per above. Failed candidates do not meet
237:Non-notable political candidate. Fails
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
457:21:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
428:15:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
411:14:52, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
390:01:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
359:18:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
340:13:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
315:23:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
295:18:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
275:18:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
255:18:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
62:09:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
493:
445:not the ongoing consensus
466:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
439:. I would keep as a
441:perennial candidate
420:John Pack Lambert
373:much more special
297:
277:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
484:
353:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
480:
474:deletion review
351:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
479:
478:
460:
459:
443:, but that is
437:WP:POLOUTCOMES
430:
413:
392:
361:
342:
317:
299:
298:
278:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
477:
475:
471:
467:
462:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
369:
365:
362:
360:
356:
355:
354:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
305:- Fails GNG.
304:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:Stuart Starky
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
68:Stuart Starky
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
54:Jo-Jo Eumerus
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
465:
463:
432:
415:
394:
377:
372:
367:
363:
349:
348:
344:
319:
302:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
201:free images
470:talk page
37:talk page
472:or in a
330:. Best,
307:Missvain
287:Muboshgu
267:Muboshgu
247:Muboshgu
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
449:Bearian
403:Bkissin
399:WP:NPOL
382:Bearcat
368:holding
328:WP:NPOL
243:WP:NPOL
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
433:Delete
416:Delete
395:Delete
378:enough
364:Delete
345:Delete
324:WP:GNG
322:Fails
320:Delete
303:Delete
239:WP:GNG
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
332:GPL93
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
453:talk
435:per
424:talk
407:talk
386:talk
352:EDDY
336:talk
326:and
311:talk
291:talk
285:. –
271:talk
265:. –
251:talk
241:and
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
229:TWL
158:– (
455:)
447:.
426:)
409:)
401:.
388:)
357:~
338:)
313:)
293:)
273:)
253:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
451:(
422:(
405:(
384:(
334:(
309:(
289:(
269:(
249:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.