569:° ′″Comment" shaktisviolin is the one who created this article and since this is my first article, that is why I am not an old-hand at this. I created this article, but then I asked for help with an edit because I didn't know it was against the rules or that I would be accused of sockpuppeting. I did not get the proper references on at first because I didn't understand the kind of references that were required. I am still not through with the reference page because all links aren't present yet but I think I'm getting the hang of it. Bear with me. Please??? (
78:
588:
In my opinion the page should be kept live for improvement. I found that two of the largest and most prestigious stuttering communities in the world (the
British Stammering Association and the National Stuttering Association) support the Stuttering Hexagon. Both Harrison and Alan Badmington have
682:
I hereby declare that I am giving my concern against the deletion assuming good faith as per wikipedia guidlines. I found this page in the AFD List and thought I should give my concern after going through the page of
Stuttering Hexagon. I would like to state that it should be given a chance for
589:
delivered
Keynotes to those conventions about the Stuttering Hexagon. There is no 'one' cure in the stuttering community, but only viable theories...and this is a viable theory that has been published and talked about in the stuttering community for 30 years.
361:. Google scholar has "Developing a new paradigm for stuttering." listed as cited twice. While practitioners Bodenhamer and Margolina, and a couple of others, mention or use the hexagon, it has not caught on so as to meet the paradigm equivalent of
510:
I am adding notable
Academic sources to the article. Stuttering Hexagon is a very important concept to the stuttering community and to individuals like me who stuttered severely until this concept changed my way of looking at stuttering.
283:
52:. After giving very little weight to the new accounts here that did not make arguments based on wikipedia's policies and guidelines, there is a consensus here that article does not meet the notability guidelines.
407:
85:
277:
236:
387:
430:
I think the article needs some work on the citing of the sources and editing but removing completely is a bit irrational. Maybe just tag it for improvement?
243:
687:
More in-depth research required. Editors are invited to edit the page to improve the quality and standards of the page as per wikipedia guidelines.
209:
204:
712:
336:. From the talk page and history someone is being paid to edit this on WP which is completely unacceptable; other than that per nomination.--
318:. Sourced with primary sources, blogs, and an Amazon link. Google Scholar search shows little in the way of reliable third-party coverage.
213:
554:
accounts giving non-policy-based reasons to keep this paid article, it appears that there may be sockpuppeting or meatpuppeting going on.
343:
534:
196:
663:, and a strongly suspected sockpuppet one has to wonder if this (possibly promotional) article really can stand on its own two feet. --
494:
94:
614:
538:
498:
298:
124:
744:
265:
17:
460:
660:
456:
110:
259:
83:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
770:
708:
692:
40:
751:
696:
672:
647:
598:
578:
563:
520:
481:
439:
419:
399:
378:
347:
327:
61:
255:
633:
559:
323:
200:
574:
530:
516:
704:
688:
490:
477:
305:
156:
555:
319:
766:
570:
526:
512:
192:
67:
36:
486:
473:
610:
606:
594:
590:
140:
114:
739:
338:
291:
99:
668:
643:
362:
146:
77:
57:
271:
415:
395:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
765:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
716:
618:
452:
435:
374:
314:
Poorly-sourced promotional article lacks third-party sources or evidence of notability per
734:
728:
664:
656:
639:
629:
551:
358:
315:
53:
411:
391:
174:
162:
130:
230:
369:
article, at the time I write this, did not mention the hexagon or J. Harrison. --
109:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
448:
431:
370:
366:
636:
and which were suspected of being sockpuppets and an admitted paid editor.
727:
The whole thing reads as if it were a case study. The tone violates
365:. It is not a reason for deletion, but it is interesting that the
759:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
638:
Whichever Admin closes this is advised to check that AfD... --
72:
103:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
408:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
226:
222:
218:
290:
463:with the subject of the article being discussed.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
773:). No further edits should be made to this page.
683:improvement on the basis of the following link.
655:Per nom. Also, when the Keep support is from
388:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
304:
123:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
93:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
8:
731:and the sourcing leaves much to be desired.
406:Note: This debate has been included in the
386:Note: This debate has been included in the
405:
385:
97:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
703:: An editor has expressed a concern that
605:: An editor has expressed a concern that
117:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
634:Articles for deletion/Madison McKinley
7:
661:admits being paid on another article
628:Comment - There seem to be similar
24:
76:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
113:on the part of others and to
790:
752:06:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
697:17:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
673:02:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
648:02:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
599:16:30, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
579:15:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
564:21:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
521:16:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
482:15:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
440:07:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
420:17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
400:17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
379:16:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
348:16:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
328:13:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
62:18:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
762:Please do not modify it.
550:Due the the presence of
472:: Notable per coverage.
32:Please do not modify it.
632:in this AfD as were in
155:; accounts blocked for
125:single-purpose accounts
95:policies and guidelines
539:few or no other edits
499:few or no other edits
445:Note to closing admin
719:to this discussion.
621:to this discussion.
541:outside this topic.
501:outside this topic.
459:) appears to have a
107:by counting votes.
86:not a majority vote
193:Stuttering Hexagon
68:Stuttering Hexagon
48:The result was
720:
622:
542:
502:
464:
422:
402:
341:
188:
187:
184:
111:assume good faith
781:
764:
747:
742:
737:
699:
659:, an editor who
601:
524:
484:
461:close connection
442:
337:
309:
308:
294:
246:
234:
216:
182:
170:
154:
138:
119:
89:, but instead a
80:
73:
34:
789:
788:
784:
783:
782:
780:
779:
778:
777:
771:deletion review
760:
745:
740:
735:
705:Cristine nickol
689:Cristine nickol
346:
251:
242:
207:
191:
172:
160:
144:
128:
115:sign your posts
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
787:
785:
776:
775:
755:
754:
685:
684:
676:
675:
650:
624:
623:
567:
566:
556:Logical Cowboy
544:
543:
504:
503:
466:
465:
424:
423:
403:
382:
381:
351:
350:
342:
339:JohnBlackburne
320:Logical Cowboy
312:
311:
248:
186:
185:
81:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
786:
774:
772:
768:
763:
757:
756:
753:
750:
749:
748:
743:
738:
730:
726:
723:
722:
721:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
681:
678:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
635:
631:
626:
625:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
587:
584:
583:
582:
580:
576:
572:
571:Shaktisviolin
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
546:
545:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:Shaktisviolin
522:
518:
514:
513:Shaktisviolin
509:
506:
505:
500:
496:
492:
488:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
467:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:WP:ACADEMIC#1
360:
356:
353:
352:
349:
345:
340:
335:
332:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
307:
303:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
257:
254:
253:Find sources:
249:
245:
241:
238:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:
180:
176:
168:
164:
158:
152:
148:
142:
136:
132:
126:
122:
118:
116:
112:
106:
102:
101:
96:
92:
88:
87:
82:
79:
75:
74:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
761:
758:
733:
732:
724:
700:
686:
679:
652:
627:
602:
585:
568:
547:
507:
487:Emilysantoss
474:Emilysantoss
469:
444:
427:
354:
333:
313:
301:
295:
287:
280:
274:
268:
262:
252:
239:
178:
166:
157:sockpuppetry
150:
139:; suspected
134:
120:
108:
104:
98:
90:
84:
49:
47:
31:
28:
715:) has been
617:) has been
537:) has made
497:) has made
278:free images
607:Hillysilly
591:Hillysilly
367:Stuttering
91:discussion
767:talk page
717:canvassed
619:canvassed
412:• Gene93k
392:• Gene93k
147:canvassed
141:canvassed
100:consensus
37:talk page
769:or in a
713:contribs
665:Jersey92
640:Jersey92
615:contribs
535:contribs
495:contribs
457:contribs
237:View log
179:username
173:{{subst:
167:username
161:{{subst:
151:username
145:{{subst:
135:username
129:{{subst:
54:Davewild
39:or in a
729:WP:NPOV
657:WP:SPAs
630:WP:SPAs
548:Comment
284:WP refs
272:scholar
210:protect
205:history
143:users:
725:Delete
653:Delete
552:WP:SPA
449:Klokus
432:Klokus
371:Bejnar
359:WP:GNG
357:Fails
355:Delete
334:delete
316:WP:GNG
256:Google
214:delete
50:delete
344:deeds
299:JSTOR
260:books
244:Stats
231:views
223:watch
219:links
121:Note:
16:<
709:talk
701:Note
693:talk
680:Keep
669:talk
644:talk
611:talk
603:Note
595:talk
586:Keep
575:talk
560:talk
531:talk
517:talk
508:Keep
491:talk
478:talk
470:Keep
453:talk
436:talk
428:Keep
416:talk
396:talk
375:talk
324:talk
292:FENS
266:news
227:logs
201:talk
197:edit
58:talk
746:ian
741:dar
736:Ish
306:TWL
235:– (
175:csp
171:or
163:csm
131:spa
105:not
711:•
695:)
671:)
646:)
613:•
597:)
581:)
577:)
562:)
533:•
525:—
523:)
519:)
493:•
485:—
480:)
455:•
447::
443:—
438:)
418:)
410:.
398:)
390:.
377:)
326:)
286:)
229:|
225:|
221:|
217:|
212:|
208:|
203:|
199:|
181:}}
169:}}
159::
153:}}
137:}}
127::
60:)
707:(
691:(
667:(
642:(
609:(
593:(
573:(
558:(
529:(
515:(
511:(
489:(
476:(
451:(
434:(
414:(
394:(
373:(
322:(
310:)
302:·
296:·
288:·
281:·
275:·
269:·
263:·
258:(
250:(
247:)
240:·
233:)
195:(
183:.
177:|
165:|
149:|
133:|
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
