Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Stark, Arizona - Knowledge

Source 📝

365:
this case, there's no indication of where their information comes from, so when they say it's a settlement, I have to ask, "how do they know that?" Moreover, the indication is that nobody has actually made a site visit. As for the two homesteaders, what we have here is just a name drop. I can just as well believe that Stark happened to be the post office where they got their mail; the passages aren't about Stark, and they don't say anything about it. Everything else is inference.
364:
While I don't completely discount ghosttowns.com, they are an amateur, self-published, and to some degree crowd-sourced site; I can't see taking them as a reliable source for writing material here, though I am willing to accept their photographs as some degree of verification of other sources. But in
236:
Looking at topos, it looks as though Mr. Stark's ranch eventually was called the "Valley View Ranch", and GMaps shows only ruins. Likewise the rail line is gone, and from the article text you can already guess: yes, Stark was yet another isolated passing siding with nothing around it. One ranch, at
421:
as there were unrelated people reported to be "from" Stark and lots of legal notices about land claims. I also found this snippet "The overpass at Stark, Arizona, was formally dedicated February 8 (1931). This was the first work of this character in the entire country completed under President
422:
Roosevelt's WPA grade separation program. The dedication program was ..." I'm not sure what to make of this. Grade separation means the railroad was elevated over another busy route - but I don't know what this could be.
205: 313:
Having a post office isn't evidence for a settlement/community; they were put in all sorts of places (especially railroad stations) as an expedient, but the places were quite often isolated.
166: 296: 199: 379:
It does confirm that there were more residents than just the postmaster. There are a number of other land transfers, so there was definitely a real population at Stark. ~
274: 254: 113: 98: 139: 134: 143: 220: 126: 93: 86: 17: 187: 404:
Clearly a railroad facility. A post office is not a reliable indication of a community. Nothing to indicate notability.
107: 103: 181: 445: 40: 177: 428: 413: 390: 374: 355: 322: 308: 286: 266: 246: 68: 130: 441: 409: 227: 36: 382: 347: 122: 74: 213: 341: 338: 193: 82: 64: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
440:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
405: 370: 318: 282: 262: 242: 304: 54: 58: 335: 160: 366: 314: 299:
which had a procedural keep. Having a separate AfD for Stark is fine with me.
278: 258: 238: 300: 423: 436:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
295:. Stark had a post office. BTW - Stark was part of a 156: 152: 148: 212: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 448:). No further edits should be made to this page. 273:Note: This discussion has been included in the 253:Note: This discussion has been included in the 275:list of Geography-related deletion discussions 226: 8: 255:list of Arizona-related deletion discussions 114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 272: 252: 237:some distance, does not a community make. 334:Not just a siding but a settlement per 7: 24: 99:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 414:21:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC) 391:20:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 375:19:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 356:15:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 323:05:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 309:03:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC) 287:16:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 267:16:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 247:16:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 429:05:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC) 89:(AfD)? Read these primers! 69:12:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 465: 438:Please do not modify it. 344:, so not just a ranch. ~ 32:Please do not modify it. 87:Articles for deletion 297:previous blanket AfD 339:There were at least 55:(non-admin closure) 289: 269: 104:Guide to deletion 94:How to contribute 57: 456: 385: 350: 231: 230: 216: 164: 146: 84: 61: 53: 34: 464: 463: 459: 458: 457: 455: 454: 453: 452: 446:deletion review 383: 348: 342:a few residents 173: 137: 121: 118: 81: 78: 59: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 462: 460: 451: 450: 432: 431: 416: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 359: 358: 328: 327: 326: 325: 290: 270: 234: 233: 170: 123:Stark, Arizona 117: 116: 111: 101: 96: 79: 77: 75:Stark, Arizona 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 461: 449: 447: 443: 439: 434: 433: 430: 427: 426: 420: 417: 415: 411: 407: 403: 400: 399: 392: 388: 387: 386: 378: 377: 376: 372: 368: 363: 362: 361: 360: 357: 353: 352: 351: 343: 340: 336: 333: 330: 329: 324: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175:Find sources: 171: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 90: 88: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 66: 62: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 437: 435: 424: 418: 401: 381: 380: 346: 345: 331: 292: 235: 223: 217: 209: 202: 196: 190: 184: 174: 80: 49: 47: 31: 28: 406:Glendoremus 200:free images 442:talk page 419:Weak keep 293:Weak Keep 37:talk page 444:or in a 167:View log 108:glossary 39:or in a 206:WP refs 194:scholar 140:protect 135:history 85:New to 60:Pamzeis 402:Delete 367:Mangoe 315:Mangoe 279:Mangoe 259:Mangoe 239:Mangoe 178:Google 144:delete 301:Cxbrx 221:JSTOR 182:books 161:views 153:watch 149:links 16:< 410:talk 384:EDDY 371:talk 349:EDDY 332:Keep 319:talk 305:talk 283:talk 263:talk 243:talk 214:FENS 188:news 157:logs 131:talk 127:edit 65:talk 50:keep 228:TWL 165:– ( 425:MB 412:) 389:~ 373:) 354:~ 337:. 321:) 307:) 285:) 277:. 265:) 257:. 245:) 208:) 159:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 142:| 138:| 133:| 129:| 67:) 52:. 408:( 369:( 317:( 303:( 281:( 261:( 241:( 232:) 224:· 218:· 210:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 180:( 172:( 169:) 163:) 125:( 110:) 106:( 63:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Pamzeis
talk
12:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Stark, Arizona

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Stark, Arizona
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.