439:: This article rang my alarm bells because of the quantity of embedded external links, which would need to be cleaned out if it were kept. The sources are dreadful, the text gave the impression of someone important enough to have good sources, but when I Googled and struggled to find anything independent. I didn't think he passed NPROF as, although he's held a lot of academic positions, none leapt out as super-senior. He's clearly a solid committee-member, and been on loads of think-tanks, but I can't assess the notability of think-tanks, and I'm no judge of military matters, so I didn't feel confident to bring the article here myself. The article also suffers from SPA-editing. But I agree with
249:(see italics below first image stating "this blog"). This is far from "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". I do acknowledge that my attempts to find further articles from Google News etc. were frustrated by the seemingly more prominent
244:
remove all unreferenced claims, there would be practically nothing left in the article. The only references appear to be press releases/staff pages from institutions he has been at (so not independent from him) with a single exception in terms of an article published by "NATO Strategic
Communications
355:
I don't really trust the tone of that source in general, but even that source talks almost as much about his non-academic work. And this one cited on his page by his own college at
Cambridge, which would have every reason to talk up his academic achievements, talks mostly about what he's done in a
453:); by the time we've cleaned the article of what shouldn't be in it, there's not going to be anything left. At the moment, I can't see any alternative to delete. But if anyone can find some sourcing, I'd be happy to change my mind.
201:
276:
195:
158:
253:, so it's not impossible I might have missed something. While Jolly appears to have held several academic positions, I don't think any of these are enough to fulfill
469:
293:
131:
126:
135:
105:
90:
118:
245:
Centre of
Excellence" which I can't figure out the reliability and independence of. The only "news article" I can find about the person is
216:
183:
312:: I also tried a number of searches (including the Rainbow in the Dark doctrine) to see if there was a possibility of satisfying
85:
78:
17:
450:
415:
246:
331:
481:
462:
431:
404:
373:
350:
339:
325:
302:
285:
268:
177:
60:
57:
162:
99:
95:
250:
173:
122:
499:
40:
223:
114:
66:
427:
334:
has sigcov of Jolly (and states that his work is important/influential) but I'm not sure it's independent. (
321:
53:
395:. Happy to be proved wrong though, if someone can find some independant reviews of his works or similar. -
495:
400:
36:
477:
369:
454:
189:
458:
209:
444:
423:
361:
317:
313:
264:
254:
388:
357:
237:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
494:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
396:
335:
473:
384:
365:
297:
280:
440:
392:
258:
233:
152:
344:
422:(with some questionable sourcing) from the MI7 article relating to Jolly.
236:. I attempted first to salvage this by removing some of the worst
490:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
418:, it looks there might have been a bit of puffery going on.
277:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
414:
looking at contributions to this page and related ones by
358:
https://www.clarealumni.com/file/ClareNews_Edition31.pdf
419:
148:
144:
140:
208:
316:but couldn't find anything of substance. Regards,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
502:). No further edits should be made to this page.
468:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
240:, but quickly realized that if I were to do so
470:list of Military-related deletion discussions
222:
8:
294:list of England-related deletion discussions
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
467:
291:
274:
420:I excised a whole section of speculation
7:
360:(pg. 8). He certainly doesn't pass
24:
91:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
416:Special:Contributions/Manorial
1:
482:16:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
463:21:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
432:21:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
405:18:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
374:03:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
351:03:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
326:02:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
303:19:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
286:19:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
269:19:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
61:21:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
251:politician of the same name
247:this The Guardian blog post
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
519:
492:Please do not modify it.
115:Stephen Jolly (academic)
67:Stephen Jolly (academic)
32:Please do not modify it.
356:non-academic capacity:
163:edits since nomination
79:Articles for deletion
383:not convinced meets
484:
305:
288:
232:The article is a
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
510:
347:
300:
283:
227:
226:
212:
156:
138:
76:
34:
518:
517:
513:
512:
511:
509:
508:
507:
506:
500:deletion review
345:
298:
281:
169:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
516:
514:
505:
504:
486:
485:
465:
434:
408:
407:
378:
377:
376:
307:
306:
289:
230:
229:
166:
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
515:
503:
501:
497:
493:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
466:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
446:
442:
438:
435:
433:
429:
425:
424:GraemeLeggett
421:
417:
413:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
348:
341:
337:
333:
330:
329:
328:
327:
323:
319:
318:Cinderella157
315:
311:
304:
301:
295:
290:
287:
284:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
261:
256:
252:
248:
243:
239:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
491:
489:
447:
436:
411:
380:
343:
309:
308:
259:
241:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
72:
49:
47:
31:
28:
397:Kj cheetham
362:WP:Academic
332:this source
314:WP:ACADEMIC
255:WP:ACADEMIC
196:free images
474:Necrothesp
391:, or even
389:WP:NAUTHOR
366:asilvering
238:WP:PUFFERY
496:talk page
455:Elemimele
299:Spiderone
282:Spiderone
37:talk page
498:or in a
451:contribs
441:Ljleppan
385:WP:NPROF
310:* Delete
260:Ljleppan
159:View log
100:glossary
39:or in a
412:Comment
202:WP refs
190:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
437:Delete
393:WP:GNG
381:Delete
346:buidhe
234:WP:BLP
174:Google
136:delete
58:(talk)
50:delete
364:. --
217:JSTOR
178:books
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
478:talk
459:talk
445:talk
428:talk
401:talk
370:talk
322:talk
265:talk
210:FENS
184:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
242:and
224:TWL
157:– (
54:PMC
52:. ♠
480:)
472:.
461:)
430:)
403:)
387:,
372:)
342:)
338:·
324:)
296:.
279:.
267:)
257:.
204:)
161:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
56:♠
476:(
457:(
448:·
443:(
426:(
399:(
368:(
340:c
336:t
320:(
263:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.