468:
a clear consensus that 1. Sourcing matters 2. Your opinion that it doesn't is not the consensus. And that's just in like the last week with the ones I've been paying attention to. I'm sure you will discount those as not being consensus based outcomes though for some reason, just like you have the guidelines and RfC, and continue to dig your heals into the notion that your correct because "experience" and "how things were done 10 years ago" Etc. Etc. In the meantime, the current facts of the matter are clearly against your "experience" and you cut and pasting the same keep message everywhere isn't effective. So why not just skip it and provide a couple of reliable in-depth sources so these articles can be legitimately kept instead? I'm more then willing to change my vote to keep if anyone does. --
467:
Just glancing over the nominations of this type by
Vincentvikram so far, I think we are at two or three closed and all of them have closed as delete. There's been several other nominations of the same type by other users in the past couple of days that have closed as delete also. So, that sounds like
371:
Can you please link that guidelines which equates "degree-awarding" to "teaching at degree level". In India, we actually have private institutions which *do* award degrees and these are called private deemed universities. This and other AFDs you have been !voting on do not come under that category.
356:
No, I can assure you that I am not. By "degree-awarding institution" we mean any college that teaches to degree level, not specifically only those that award their own degrees (this would, for instance, rule out
British polytechnics, which did not award their own degrees). This has always been the
583:
Private colleges have to be notable like any other private organization. They don't get a special pass when it comes to notability just for being "degree awarding" or whatever. In this case, there is not enough adequate sourcing for the article to be notable enough to warrant keeping it. Period.
496:
is randomly nominating articles without any solid statement. I noticed, he provided almost same reason (Notability and non
Reliable Sources) for all articles nominated for deletion. It seems like his edits are not constructive on Knowledge.
198:
543:
588:
good sources that follow the relevant guidelines I'm happy to change my vote to keep. I couldn't find any myself though and I haven't seen anyone who thinks the article should be kept provide any either.
252:
192:
132:
127:
136:
357:
case. Affiliated colleges still meet the criteria. This status is, of course, particularly common for colleges in India, and many of them have been kept on this basis. --
119:
159:
408:
267:
282:
539:
106:
91:
415:
and may not be relevant to this particular article. Please consider adding your opinion about whether this specific subject meets any relevant
213:
180:
665:
624:
598:
573:
560:
530:
511:
477:
462:
448:
439:
424:
390:
376:
366:
351:
335:
321:
309:
289:
274:
259:
243:
61:
174:
86:
79:
17:
326:
The article and its website certainly say it is! There's a long list of degrees in the article. Why do you think it isn't? --
170:
657:
412:
347:
I would suggest that you please verify the fact before voting as you are stating a non-existant point as if it were a fact.
123:
220:
566:
115:
67:
100:
96:
653:
633:
607:
682:
40:
186:
678:
36:
345:
It is affiliated to Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
Technical University and Chaudhary Charan Singh University.
661:
458:
435:
416:
386:
362:
331:
305:
57:
206:
649:
594:
570:
526:
493:
473:
445:
430:
You seem to be suggesting that consensus is irrelevant! Not sure where you got that one from. --
421:
373:
348:
318:
286:
271:
256:
240:
230:
52:. Despite having ben relisted twice, there is no clear consensus for either "keep" or "delete".
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
677:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
585:
454:
431:
382:
358:
340:
327:
301:
53:
453:
Consensus is never irrelevant. It's the whole basis of how we do things on
Knowledge. --
643:
590:
522:
469:
343:
I think you are voting without reading anything written. The article clearly states,
618:
153:
521:
The
Article seems to be non-notable without the presence of any reliable source.
547:
498:
538:
Degree awarded institute which is affiliated with a recognized university
381:
As I have said, this is consensus and has been applied many times. --
411:
from previous discussions about average articles on this subject are
317:
I cannot find any data to show it is a degree awarding institution.
673:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
636:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
610:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
253:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
149:
145:
141:
300:. Accredited degree-awarding tertiary institution. --
205:
642:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
616:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
569:which is a good reason to delete rather than keep.
239:with the university page, since that is notable.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
685:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
251:Note: This discussion has been included in the
229:Not notable and no reliable sources present.
219:
8:
268:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
540:Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University
283:list of India-related deletion discussions
280:
265:
250:
546:is my argument for similar institutions.
584:Otherwise, if someone wants to provide
565:The wiki link leads to an argument for
344:
7:
24:
116:Sunder Deep Group of Institutions
68:Sunder Deep Group of Institutions
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
233:13:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
702:
666:10:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
625:18:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
599:08:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
574:10:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
561:18:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
531:17:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
512:17:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
478:03:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
463:16:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
449:14:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
440:11:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
425:19:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
391:16:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
377:16:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
367:16:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
352:16:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
336:15:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
322:14:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
310:14:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
290:13:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
275:13:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
260:13:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
244:10:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
62:17:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
675:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
413:not binding on this one
567:wp:other stuff exists
444:{{outcomes}} tag :-)
80:Articles for deletion
494:User:Vincentvikram
668:
627:
292:
277:
262:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
693:
646:
641:
639:
637:
621:
615:
613:
611:
557:
554:
551:
508:
505:
502:
409:typical outcomes
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
701:
700:
696:
695:
694:
692:
691:
690:
689:
683:deletion review
669:
644:
632:
630:
628:
619:
606:
604:
555:
552:
549:
506:
503:
500:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
699:
697:
688:
687:
640:
629:
614:
603:
602:
601:
578:
577:
576:
571:Vikram Vincent
533:
515:
514:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
446:Vikram Vincent
422:Vikram Vincent
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
374:Vikram Vincent
349:Vikram Vincent
319:Vikram Vincent
294:
293:
287:Vikram Vincent
278:
272:Vikram Vincent
263:
257:Vikram Vincent
241:Vikram Vincent
231:Vikram Vincent
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
698:
686:
684:
680:
676:
671:
670:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
638:
635:
626:
623:
622:
612:
609:
600:
596:
592:
587:
582:
579:
575:
572:
568:
564:
563:
562:
559:
558:
545:
541:
537:
534:
532:
528:
524:
520:
517:
516:
513:
510:
509:
495:
492:
489:
488:
479:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
418:
414:
410:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
375:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
353:
350:
346:
342:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
320:
316:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
295:
291:
288:
284:
279:
276:
273:
269:
264:
261:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
238:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
674:
672:
631:
617:
605:
580:
548:
535:
518:
499:
490:
420:
314:
297:
236:
235:* Propose a
234:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
419:guideline.
193:free images
455:Necrothesp
432:Necrothesp
417:notability
383:Necrothesp
359:Necrothesp
341:Necrothesp
328:Necrothesp
302:Necrothesp
54:Randykitty
679:talk page
37:talk page
681:or in a
645:Aseleste
634:Relisted
608:Relisted
591:Adamant1
586:WP:THREE
523:Pranhita
470:Adamant1
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
620:MBisanz
491:Comment
315:Comment
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
581:Delete
519:Delete
171:Google
137:delete
237:merge
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
595:talk
544:Here
536:Keep
527:talk
474:talk
459:talk
436:talk
407:The
387:talk
363:talk
332:talk
306:talk
298:Keep
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
556:Son
507:Son
221:TWL
158:– (
664:)
660:,
656:|
652:,
597:)
589:--
553:My
542:.
529:)
504:My
476:)
461:)
438:)
389:)
365:)
334:)
308:)
285:.
270:.
255:.
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
662:l
658:c
654:e
650:t
648:(
593:(
550:D
525:(
501:D
472:(
457:(
434:(
385:(
361:(
330:(
304:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.