564:
already demonstrate a meeting of GNG there is no need to explain my assessment of these sources. Per WP:NPOL - being an unelected candidate does not guarantee notability, though such people can be notable if they meet GNG. As this individual undoubtedly meets GNG per the above, there is no tenable argument for deletion.
279:
Semi-procedural nomination: Articles about this apparently-perennial candidate have been brought to AfD 2 times already (the first AfD is about an unrelated subject who shares the name), and each time the consensus has been deletion due to lack of coverage other than routine election press. The same
563:
coverage from the NYT in the first page of results. Of significance is this coverage is only two weeks old, demonstrating the subject has been covered for a sustained period of time. There is countless examples of further significant coverage within the article and online, but as the sources shown
327:
Previous AfDs aside, Patel is now competing in a radically redrawn congressional district. The two other competitors are both powerful
Democrats of long standing - Jerry Nadler and Carolyn Maloney. Patel's campaign ads are more visible than theirs . Finally, in the 2020 Democratic primary, Patel
280:
can be said of the level of coverage this time around as well. The argument could be made that the amassed coverage across the elections adds up to GNG, but I think this needs to be brought to community attention given the number of times the article has been discussed.
475:
Quite apart from the fact he hasn't been elected, he fails WP:NPOL - even being serially unelected. That's the trouble with democracy - you don't get elected, youse is nobody. There's no other grounds for notability I can see. Best
517:
specifically states that unelected candidates can still be notable if they meet the GNG, which Patel does based on significant coverage from several reliable sources cited in the article, including the New York Times.
248:
345:
Under no circumstances should this be deleted, it provides valuable nominee information, and not winning the prior primaries should have no bearing on this, I would suggest that it's removal is being discussed
111:
106:
101:
535:- Per WP:GNG, a subject is presumed to be be suitable for a stand-alone article when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent. Coverage
303:
205:
242:
307:
546:
152:
96:
137:
299:
536:
349:
178:
173:
132:
125:
17:
573:
527:
503:
485:
463:
432:
411:
390:
357:
340:
321:
291:
80:
490:
Notability is determined by coverage in reliable sources. Perennial candidates who never win can be still notable sometimes.
182:
550:
263:
230:
165:
209:
146:
142:
545:
discusses the subject and their political campaign. This is hence what I consider to be significant coverage from a
443:
370:
329:
590:
481:
40:
560:
353:
224:
586:
220:
36:
402:
Nothing notable, seems to enjoy running for election, hardly enough on which to base an article here.
569:
540:
477:
71:
407:
270:
256:
332:
554:
523:
498:
458:
427:
336:
121:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
585:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
169:
565:
59:
236:
514:
403:
54:
519:
493:
453:
422:
314:
284:
199:
161:
86:
381:
348:
due to political competition reasons, flagged by said adversaries.
581:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
446:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
373:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
195:
191:
187:
255:
331:. Whether or not he wins, he is not inconsequential.
452:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
379:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
112:Articles for deletion/Suraj Patel (4th nomination)
107:Articles for deletion/Suraj Patel (3rd nomination)
102:Articles for deletion/Suraj Patel (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
593:). No further edits should be made to this page.
298:Note: This discussion has been included in the
419:, appears to have a number of real references.
269:
8:
153:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
297:
547:perennial source which has by consensus
94:
7:
328:achieved 39.3% to Maloney's 42.7%
24:
97:Articles for deletion/Suraj Patel
302:lists for the following topics:
138:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
549:been found reliable. Same for
1:
128:(AfD)? Read these primers!
610:
81:03:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
574:07:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
528:21:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
504:22:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
486:13:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
464:11:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
433:23:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
412:19:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
391:03:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
358:17:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
341:13:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
322:01:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
292:01:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
583:Please do not modify it.
559:. A Google search shows
32:Please do not modify it.
92:AfDs for this article:
210:edits since nomination
126:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
466:
393:
324:
143:Guide to deletion
133:How to contribute
57:
601:
502:
501:
461:
456:
451:
449:
447:
431:
430:
389:
378:
376:
374:
300:deletion sorting
274:
273:
259:
203:
185:
123:
78:
77:
69:
68:
53:
34:
609:
608:
604:
603:
602:
600:
599:
598:
597:
591:deletion review
497:
491:
478:Alexandermcnabb
459:
454:
442:
440:
426:
420:
380:
369:
367:
313:
283:
216:
176:
160:
157:
120:
117:
116:
90:
73:
72:
64:
60:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
607:
605:
596:
595:
577:
576:
556:New York Times
530:
508:
507:
506:
469:
468:
450:
436:
435:
414:
396:
395:
377:
363:
362:
361:
360:
346:
343:
311:
281:
277:
276:
213:
156:
155:
150:
140:
135:
118:
115:
114:
109:
104:
99:
93:
91:
89:
84:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
606:
594:
592:
588:
584:
579:
578:
575:
571:
567:
562:
558:
557:
553:piece in the
552:
548:
544:
543:
538:
534:
531:
529:
525:
521:
516:
512:
509:
505:
500:
496:
495:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
474:
471:
470:
467:
465:
462:
457:
448:
445:
438:
437:
434:
429:
425:
424:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
394:
392:
388:
386:
385:
375:
372:
365:
364:
359:
355:
351:
350:79.68.229.172
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
323:
320:
319:
318:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
289:
288:
272:
268:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
222:
219:
218:Find sources:
214:
211:
207:
201:
197:
193:
189:
184:
180:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
139:
136:
134:
131:
130:
129:
127:
122:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
88:
85:
83:
82:
79:
76:
70:
67:
63:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
582:
580:
555:
541:
532:
510:
492:
472:
441:
439:
421:
416:
399:
383:
382:
368:
366:
316:
315:
286:
285:
278:
266:
260:
252:
245:
239:
233:
227:
217:
119:
74:
65:
61:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
304:Politicians
243:free images
162:Suraj Patel
87:Suraj Patel
566:MaxnaCarta
587:talk page
404:Oaktree b
37:talk page
589:or in a
542:The Hill
520:Hatman31
494:Andrevan
444:Relisted
423:Andrevan
371:Relisted
317:Rosguill
312:signed,
308:New York
287:Rosguill
282:signed,
206:View log
147:glossary
39:or in a
561:further
515:WP:NPOL
333:Tedency
249:WP refs
237:scholar
179:protect
174:history
124:New to
473:Delete
460:plicit
400:Delete
221:Google
183:delete
62:Formal
539:from
264:JSTOR
225:books
200:views
192:watch
188:links
16:<
570:talk
551:this
537:here
533:Keep
524:talk
511:Keep
482:talk
417:Keep
408:talk
354:talk
337:talk
306:and
257:FENS
231:news
196:logs
170:talk
166:edit
75:talk
66:Dude
271:TWL
204:– (
572:)
526:)
513:-
484:)
410:)
387:iz
356:)
339:)
310:.
251:)
208:|
198:|
194:|
190:|
186:|
181:|
177:|
172:|
168:|
58:––
52:.
568:(
522:(
499:@
480:(
455:✗
428:@
406:(
384:L
352:(
335:(
275:)
267:·
261:·
253:·
246:·
240:·
234:·
228:·
223:(
215:(
212:)
202:)
164:(
149:)
145:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.