385:, the standard bibliographic reference work in the field. (Most large public and academic libraries have the set online.) This to me is a sufficient decisive factor, for WP includes all such authoritative subject biographical encyclopedias. Additionally there's a review in Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books the reviews in SLJ and Booklist, both from the American Library Association are brief, but they have consistently been held at AfDs as meeting the requirements for WP:AUTHOR. :I suspect it may not have realized that in spite of its popularist title, Something About he Author is part of the authoritative series of Gale biographical reference books. (I seem to remember that when a librarian I warned the publisher about using such a title).
391:
libraries buy books on the basis of just those reviews). I do not rely on Kirkus, for some of its reviews are paid for (though not written) by the author in the case of self-published books--tho these books are not self-published , I consider such a compromise unacceptable, though I know others in WP have defended its use.
233:
This author does not appear to meet notability requirements for an author. Authors must show significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. This author did publish a book, but the sources are mostly her own website and Kirkus reviews, the latter of which are a baseline industry standard and
509:
At AFD those are generally accepted as evidence of notability. They're specialty publications that focus on book reviews, so of course they publish more of them than a general newspaper might. 6,000 reviews is still very selective considering several million books are published each year. If you
390:
The references to number of books in WorldCat libraries appears in thousand of our articles; it has not been recognized as a decisive factor, but it is suggestive. (for poplar work, there is a direct correlation between reviews in
Booklist, SLJ, and LJ with public library holdings, for public
490:
All of those sources are publications that write short reviews for the industry to help libraries and booksellers make decisions. SLJ, for example, publishes 6,000 reviews a year. They are not really the same as general interest reviews for the public (NYTimes
238:. In my view, the article itself does not appear to follow MOS guidelines and is promotional and unencyclopedic in style, which could be fixed, but that would require reliable, independent sources, which are hard to come by.
202:
396:
As for encyclopedic nature, I agree the teaching section must be removed. It were not in the article when i last saw it, in 2013--they we added a few days laterby another vwery prolific editor that year at
495:). Those industry sources are pretty standard, and not a sign of notablility, as opposed to just published by a major publisher, which is not, in and of itself, notable. In my interpretation, anyway.
234:
do not reflect significant coverage. Interviews listed in the references cannot be accessed when I clicked, and the only major review I could find online appears to be a user-submitted review,
283:
163:
349:
196:
309:
329:
95:
110:
376:
for calling this to my attention--I left it a sparse but decent article 8 years ago, and was a little horrified to see what had become of it.S
136:
131:
140:
90:
83:
17:
123:
403:
MrNiceGuy1113]], to be likely copypaste, and I have removed the section. i wouldn't object to removing a little more of it.
382:
217:
184:
104:
100:
53:
372:
I was notified, but all I did was add the books, library holdings, translations, and some of the reviews. I want to thank
500:
447:
260:
243:
61:
560:
40:
235:
178:
535:
504:
485:
451:
437:
414:
361:
341:
321:
299:
264:
247:
65:
174:
496:
443:
373:
256:
239:
57:
492:
275:
556:
224:
127:
36:
442:
Notability is established by independent, reliable sources, though. I don't see those sources. Do you?
279:
291:
425:
424:. Certainly needs some cleanup, but she appears to have authored a body of notable works, so passes
357:
337:
317:
210:
400:
I suspect them, and many thousand other contributions of the now departed [[User::MrNiceGuy1113|
511:
469:
190:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
555:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
514:, but I would oppose any change to disregard specialists in the field of book review such as
473:
456:
The article includes (poorly formatted) citations showing many of her books were reviewed by
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
531:
481:
433:
119:
71:
287:
381:
As forr notability, she's in Gale
Something About the Author, which used to be known as
353:
333:
313:
410:
255:
New information has been brought to this, and some editors have made strong points.
157:
527:
477:
429:
405:
551:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
510:
disagree with the guideline I suggest starting a discussion at
284:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 12
398:
153:
149:
145:
209:
223:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
563:). No further edits should be made to this page.
348:Note: This discussion has been included in the
328:Note: This discussion has been included in the
308:Note: This discussion has been included in the
350:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions
8:
310:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
347:
330:list of Women-related deletion discussions
327:
307:
468:and more. These books would all pass
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
476:? If so, that's a different matter.
24:
383:Dictionary of Literary Biography
96:Introduction to deletion process
1:
472:. Are you claiming this is a
282:). I have transcluded it to
536:16:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
505:16:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
486:15:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
452:15:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
438:15:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
415:07:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
362:21:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
342:21:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
322:21:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
300:21:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
265:22:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
248:20:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
66:17:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
274:This AfD was not correctly
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
580:
52:. Nomination withdrawn. (
553:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
253:Withdrawn by nominator.
493:publishes only 20 - 30
462:School Library Journal
84:Articles for deletion
497:Pyrrho the Skeptic
444:Pyrrho the Skeptic
374:Pyrrho the Skeptic
272:Automated comment:
257:Pyrrho the Skeptic
240:Pyrrho the Skeptic
58:Pyrrho the Skeptic
466:Publishers Weekly
364:
344:
324:
302:
298:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
54:non-admin closure
571:
294:
293:Talk to my owner
289:
270:
228:
227:
213:
161:
143:
120:Susane Colasanti
81:
72:Susane Colasanti
34:
579:
578:
574:
573:
572:
570:
569:
568:
567:
561:deletion review
297:
292:
170:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
577:
575:
566:
565:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
418:
417:
401:
393:
392:
387:
386:
378:
377:
366:
365:
345:
325:
304:
303:
290:
231:
230:
167:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
576:
564:
562:
558:
554:
549:
548:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
407:
402:
399:
395:
394:
389:
388:
384:
380:
379:
375:
371:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
301:
295:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
552:
550:
523:
519:
515:
465:
461:
457:
421:
404:
369:
278:to the log (
271:
252:
251:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
276:transcluded
197:free images
50:speedy keep
426:WP:NAUTHOR
557:talk page
354:Shellwood
334:Shellwood
314:Shellwood
37:talk page
559:or in a
512:WP:NBOOK
470:WP:NBOOK
164:View log
105:glossary
39:or in a
474:WP:HOAX
296::Online
203:WP refs
191:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
528:pburka
516:Kirkus
478:pburka
458:Kirkus
430:pburka
280:step 3
175:Google
141:delete
411:talk
370:Keep.
218:JSTOR
179:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
532:talk
522:and
501:talk
482:talk
448:talk
434:talk
422:Keep
358:talk
338:talk
318:talk
286:. —
261:talk
244:talk
236:here
211:FENS
185:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
62:talk
406:DGG
225:TWL
162:– (
534:)
526:.
524:PW
520:LJ
518:,
503:)
484:)
464:,
460:,
450:)
436:)
428:.
413:)
360:)
352:.
340:)
332:.
320:)
312:.
263:)
246:)
205:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
64:)
56:)
530:(
499:(
480:(
446:(
432:(
409:(
356:(
336:(
316:(
259:(
242:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.