457:). While in some circumstances a "first" can cause one to meet GNG or NPOL, first Indian American in a particular US state is a very narrow first even if that US state does not have a large Indian-American population. I'm not saying she is not accomplished. I'm saying she does not meet GNG or NPOL at this time. Also, you may want to edit your "Strong Oppose" to "Strong Keep," to reflect you wish for the article to be kept and avoid confusion.--
494:
To clarify, I agree with
Bearcat (below) about the standard we should evaluate local county commissioners and political candidates. I just think there is sufficient sourcing to draft an article about her policies and votes on the Commission that would merit a stand-alone article. There are articles
587:
I believe that the subject in the article is notable enough to warrant an article and meets
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards of notability. Jayapal is a current office holder for a major US government (Multnomah County, which has a population of over 800,000). If she does not meet the notabilty
588:
guidelines, then we should delete the articles for all of
Portland's city commissioners, who represent a smaller level of government with a smaller population. Jayapal has been featured in several news articles from outside of the immediate area for her work unrelated to her candidacy.
495:
about her election outside of Oregon, in the
Seattle Times and the India Post. There are multiple articles about her work on the Commission, largely in Willamette Week. All of this is prior to her announcement for Congress, where coverage has increased. -
444:
of the subject which the national articles do not provide. Additionally, local coverage (which again is a run of the mill campaign announcement) does not lend itself to GNG or NPOL. Your mention of "in less than 24 hours" also proves my point. It is
202:
418:
has already been met, and there will certainly be more national coverage of this race. She is also the first and only Indian
American ever elected in Oregon which is significant given the state's demographics.
437:
400:
269:
554:(which county commission is not), or (b) they can make some credible claim that their candidacy is somehow a special case of such uniquely greater notability than everybody else's candidacies that
436:. The extensive coverage you cite is run of the mill announcement coverage in part due to her relationship to her sister. As mentioned in my nomination, notability is not inherited. Additionally,
244:
a notable office, not just running for one. The office held is a local office and while some local officeholders can meet notability for a variety of reasons, including time in office (e.g.
159:
409:
298:
196:
318:
412:
278:
338:
91:
371:'s local politician criteria (lots of articles about her, the first Indian American elected to a county office in the state). I think I'm a soft keep here.
106:
802:
550:
if either (a) they already have some other prior claim of preexisting notability that would already have gotten them a
Knowledge (XXG) article
406:
542:
get that exemption and NPOL itself would be unenforceable and meaningless. So no, candidates don't get to be in
Knowledge (XXG) just because
392:
403:
132:
127:
136:
773:
86:
79:
17:
119:
217:
530:
show some evidence of campaign coverage — so if campaign coverage were in and of itself sufficient to exempt a candidate from
184:
100:
96:
728:
697:
670:
635:
610:
414:). Prior to this she has been routinely covered by reliable local outlets for multiple years. In my opinion the bar for
819:
40:
682:
389:
163:
651:
376:
178:
477:
781:
753:
717:
686:
657:
622:
597:
579:
504:
489:
466:
428:
398:
380:
359:
330:
310:
290:
61:
174:
765:
A lot of this coverage is run of the mill, but I think there is just barely enough here to warrant keeping.
593:
236:. Candidates do not get Knowledge (XXG) articles just for being candidates per se — the notability test at
769:
679:
395:
815:
646:
372:
224:
123:
36:
450:
446:
798:
257:
210:
669:
I agree that the sources are just routine coverage of a politician being elected. As said before,
589:
424:
777:
438:
we should not necessarily create a
Knowledge (XXG) article about the same 109 newspaper articles
766:
618:
575:
500:
485:
462:
355:
346:
326:
306:
286:
190:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
814:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
790:
563:
543:
531:
368:
237:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
245:
115:
67:
57:
415:
261:
794:
611:
The existence of other articles of a similar nature is not grounds to keep this article
253:
420:
388:
Jayapal's announcement has received multiple dedicated articles by national outlets (
614:
571:
496:
481:
458:
351:
342:
322:
302:
282:
265:
249:
153:
53:
607:"then we should delete the articles for all of Portland's city commissioners,"
252:) or being a local officeholder who qualifies under some other criteria (e.g.
744:
708:
454:
476:
I think there is sufficient coverage of her election and service on the
449:
if her candidacy will actually matter to the historic record (see
405:) in less than 24 hours, in addition to extensive local coverage (
810:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
793:, and most of the coverage she has received seems to be ROTM.
270:
731:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
700:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
638:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
739:
Final relist as this is looking like a No consensus closure.
570:(which hasn't been shown to be on the table here at all.)
149:
145:
141:
209:
742:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
706:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
644:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
546:campaign coverage exists — candidates get articles
223:
605:. She is technically not the incumbent. As far as
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
822:). No further edits should be made to this page.
299:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
337:Note: This discussion has been included in the
317:Note: This discussion has been included in the
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
609:you are more than welcome to do propose this.
260:for crime). Notability is not inherited from
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
319:list of Oregon-related deletion discussions
673:makes PortlandSaint's argument irrelevant.
336:
316:
296:
279:list of Women-related deletion discussions
276:
339:list of Law-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
367:: I think this article could meet
24:
671:Knowledge (XXG):OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
92:Introduction to deletion process
349:) 23:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
1:
803:04:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
782:19:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
754:07:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
718:05:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
558:their candidacy itself would
62:22:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
789:: Subject does not meet the
687:19:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
658:03:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
623:20:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
598:03:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
580:17:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
505:18:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
490:16:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
467:19:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
429:01:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
381:01:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
360:23:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
331:23:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
311:23:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
291:23:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
478:Multnomah County Commission
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
839:
566:for enduring significance
812:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
268:. Possible redirect to
164:edits since nomination
80:Articles for deletion
442:significant coverage
451:Christine O'Donnell
258:Betty Loren-Maltese
737:Relisting comment:
416:general notability
756:
720:
680:Industrial Insect
660:
556:even if they lose
350:
333:
313:
293:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
830:
752:
741:
734:
732:
716:
705:
703:
701:
685:
656:
654:
649:
643:
641:
639:
538:candidate would
447:too soon to know
373:TulsaPoliticsFan
246:Robert L. Butler
228:
227:
213:
157:
139:
116:Susheela Jayapal
77:
68:Susheela Jayapal
34:
838:
837:
833:
832:
831:
829:
828:
827:
826:
820:deletion review
743:
727:
725:
707:
696:
694:
678:
652:
647:
645:
634:
632:
544:run of the mill
480:to meet GNG. --
440:. GNG requires
262:Pramila Jayapal
170:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
836:
834:
825:
824:
806:
805:
784:
759:
758:
740:
735:
722:
704:
691:
690:
689:
676:
675:
674:
642:
628:
627:
626:
625:
582:
509:
508:
507:
471:
470:
469:
383:
362:
334:
314:
294:
254:Rita Crundwell
231:
230:
167:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
835:
823:
821:
817:
813:
808:
807:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
783:
779:
775:
771:
768:
764:
761:
760:
757:
755:
751:
749:
748:
738:
733:
730:
723:
721:
719:
715:
713:
712:
702:
699:
692:
688:
684:
681:
677:
672:
668:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
659:
655:
650:
640:
637:
630:
629:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
590:PortlandSaint
586:
583:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:ten year test
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:candidate in
517:
513:
510:
506:
502:
498:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
443:
439:
435:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
417:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
386:Strong Oppose
384:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
353:
348:
344:
340:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
811:
809:
786:
767:Presidentman
762:
746:
745:
736:
726:
724:
710:
709:
695:
693:
666:
633:
631:
606:
602:
584:
567:
559:
555:
551:
547:
539:
535:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
473:
441:
433:
385:
364:
266:Maya Jayapal
250:Hilmar Moore
241:
233:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
73:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
653:Mississippi
197:free images
524:everywhere
816:talk page
763:Weak keep
562:pass the
522:election
37:talk page
818:or in a
795:Let'srun
778:Talkback
774:contribs
729:Relisted
698:Relisted
636:Relisted
455:Lar Daly
421:Jamedeus
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
791:WP:NPOL
615:Mpen320
572:Bearcat
534:, then
532:WP:NPOL
497:Enos733
482:Enos733
459:Mpen320
369:WP:NPOL
352:Mpen320
343:Mpen320
323:Mpen320
303:Mpen320
283:Mpen320
242:holding
238:WP:NPOL
203:WP refs
191:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
787:Delete
683:(talk)
667:Delete
568:anyway
552:anyway
540:always
528:always
512:Delete
234:Delete
175:Google
137:delete
54:Daniel
603:Reply
585:Keep.
560:still
536:every
520:every
516:Every
434:Reply
218:JSTOR
179:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
799:talk
770:talk
648:Star
619:talk
594:talk
576:talk
548:only
526:can
501:talk
486:talk
474:Keep
463:talk
425:talk
377:talk
365:Keep
356:talk
347:talk
327:talk
307:talk
287:talk
211:FENS
185:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
613:.--
453:or
264:or
248:or
240:is
225:TWL
158:– (
52:.
801:)
780:)
772:·
750:iz
714:iz
621:)
596:)
578:)
514:.
503:)
488:)
465:)
427:)
411:,
408:,
402:,
397:,
394:,
391:,
379:)
358:)
341:.
329:)
321:.
309:)
301:.
289:)
281:.
272:.
256:,
205:)
162:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
797:(
776:(
747:L
711:L
617:(
592:(
574:(
499:(
484:(
461:(
423:(
375:(
354:(
345:(
325:(
305:(
285:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.