Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Pokernews.com - Knowledge

Source 📝

225:
show they conduct professional interviews with the poker players themselves about as reliable as you can get, the isn't a fly by night poker web sites the reports events 3rd handed, other then Cardplayer it's one of the highly regarded websites that covers a great number of high buy-in tournaments
198:
pokernews.com. It simply does not have dedicated coverage in reliable sources where it is the focus of the articles. (One other point, the article is putrid now. It could be improved obviously, but it needs to be noted that the things used as sources now, bluff and pokerworks, are owned by
273:
I've looked and I haven't found a third party reliable sources that covers the Website itself just mentions of them, but it seem due to the nature of the site and the way other sites relies on the their reports I believe in time the site will meet WP:WEB requirements however due to that
162:(see below) This isn't just a Tong G Website, PokerNews is a well known poker media site which provide official updates and chip counts for the World Series of Poker and is the official media partner of the Aussie Millions 259:. If you can find two MSNBC or similar article focusing on the history, corporate structure and value of Pokernews.com, then great it could have an article, but I've looked and I see nothing like that. 138:
article, the person who owns it. We have hundreds of poker player articles. Most of them have websites. We certainly should not make separate articles for both the players and their websites.
194:. The article you link to above merely says it will provide play by play of the WSOP. Three years ago literally fifty websites would have qualified, but more to the point, the article is not 123: 278:
I've change to delete. if events do change I will support the existence of an article on the site, as I see it as one of the most important Poker media sites on the web.▪◦▪
345:. It seems reasonable to discuss someone's business in context, even when that business doesn't deserve its own page. (I could've sworn I commented on this already...) - 165:, is a highly reliable source with first person TV interviews and reports this absolutely shouldn't had gone to AFD but does stand for some clean up and expansion.▪◦▪ 362: 221:
50 sites were not named by Harrah's nor was direct updates done by another site other then PokerNews on the Worldseriesofpoker.com official website,
134:
since mentions of it in reliable sources are in passing or press releases, not the focus of coverage. Additionally the website is covered under the
90: 85: 94: 17: 77: 393: 36: 392:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
350: 329: 163: 377: 352: 333: 298: 268: 246: 208: 185: 147: 59: 251:
As I said, I agree it is a great website. It just doesn't meet the very minimal coverage thresholds of
275: 373: 346: 81: 296: 244: 183: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
190:
It is an important website and a generally reliable source. However, it fails WEB, and
369: 264: 204: 143: 317: 252: 130:
One of many gambling news web sites. It's not a totally trivial entity but it fails
73: 65: 279: 227: 166: 53: 111: 325: 256: 191: 131: 260: 200: 139: 226:
and conducts professionally written interviews and articles about poker.▪◦▪
199:
pokernews or their business partner, or are printing a press release.
342: 321: 135: 47: 386:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
222: 118: 107: 103: 99: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 396:). No further edits should be made to this page. 363:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 8: 361:: This debate has been included in the 7: 320:; merits a mention at best in the 24: 276:Knowledge is not a crystal ball 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 378:21:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 353:10:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 334:12:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 299:13:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 269:12:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 247:12:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 209:12:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 186:12:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 148:11:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 60:05:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 413: 389:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 316:, doesn't seem to meet 339:Merge and redirect 44:The result was 380: 366: 404: 391: 367: 357: 293: 292: 290: 288: 241: 240: 238: 236: 180: 179: 177: 175: 160:Reluctant Delete 121: 115: 97: 56: 34: 412: 411: 407: 406: 405: 403: 402: 401: 400: 394:deletion review 387: 286: 284: 282: 281: 234: 232: 230: 229: 173: 171: 169: 168: 117: 88: 72: 69: 54: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 410: 408: 399: 398: 382: 381: 355: 336: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 214: 213: 212: 211: 128: 127: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 409: 397: 395: 390: 384: 383: 379: 375: 371: 364: 360: 356: 354: 351: 348: 344: 340: 337: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 312: 311: 300: 297: 295: 294: 277: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 245: 243: 242: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 210: 206: 202: 197: 193: 189: 188: 187: 184: 182: 181: 164: 161: 157: 156: 152: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74:Pokernews.com 71: 70: 67: 66:Pokernews.com 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 50: 49: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 388: 385: 358: 338: 313: 280: 228: 195: 167: 159: 154: 153: 129: 52: 46:redirect to 45: 43: 31: 28: 155:Strong Keep 223:Their site 158:change to 370:Raven1977 324:article. 124:View log 91:protect 86:history 55:MBisanz 343:Tony G 326:Stifle 322:Tony G 318:WP:WEB 314:Delete 253:WP:WEB 136:Tony G 119:delete 95:delete 48:Tony G 196:about 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 374:talk 359:Note 330:talk 265:talk 261:2005 257:WP:N 205:talk 201:2005 192:WP:N 144:talk 140:2005 132:WP:N 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 368:-- 365:. 347:Mgm 341:to 255:or 376:) 332:) 291:X≡ 283:≡S 267:) 239:X≡ 231:≡S 207:) 178:X≡ 170:≡S 146:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 51:. 372:( 349:| 328:( 289:E 287:R 285:i 263:( 237:E 235:R 233:i 203:( 176:E 174:R 172:i 142:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Tony G
MBisanz
05:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Pokernews.com
Pokernews.com
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:N
Tony G
2005
talk
11:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

≡SiREX≡

12:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
WP:N
2005
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.