700:
701:
https://www.scopus.com/results/results.uri?sort=plf-f&src=dm&nlo=&nlr=&nls=&sid=d6b95e944dc014d48ef2085d730f4b08&sot=a&sdt=cl&cluster=scoexactsrctitle%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean+Pam%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archeology+In+The+Mediterranean%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+Mediterranean%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean+Pam+20+Research+2008%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean+Pam+23+1+Research+2011%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean+Reports%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean+Research%22%2ct%2c%22Polish+Archaeology+In+The+Mediterranean+Xvi+Reports+2004%22%2ct&sl=52&s=REFSRCTITLE%28Polish+Archaeology+in+the+Mediterranean%29&origin=resultslist&zone=leftSideBar&editSaveSearch=&txGid=073cc752ae6198e3136fb3567a2d478b
484:, even though the journal exists and is affiliated with that publisher. You may say: "hey, but those are predatory journals". Yes, in the case of OMICS that's pretty clear, but how about other publishers/journals? Are we, WP editors, going to install ourselves as judges on what information lacking independent sources should be included and what can only be covered if we have those independent sources? I'm all for making it easier for academic journals to get covered, that's why we have NJournals. But if something even misses that low bar, we shouldn't cover it. --
514:. For a large publisher (legitimate or not), obviously it doesn't make sense to list the thousands of journals they publish. For a small scientific institute that publishes one or two, it probably does. I am not sure why the non-independence of the source would be relevant, unless there is some legitimate reason for thinking that the PCMA would not be a reliable source on what the PCMA publishes? –
479:
Where does it stop? Are we going to include lists of everything that the journal/institution mention on their websites? We don't do this for other things either, so why make an exception for journals? Also, this is inconsistent with our practice for other journals. We don't merge al OMICS journals to
616:
On the publisher's website you can read that although the journal is associated with the Polish Centre of
Mediterranean Archaeology it publish the research of all researches and that all articles are subject to a "double-blind reviewing process" by independent experts, which ensures the journal's
617:
independence from the institution. I checked that journal articles are cited e.g. in the Scopus database (216 citations in journals indexed in Scopus. The journal is indexed in Index
Copernicus, Central and Eastern European Online Library and BazHum.
205:
248:.". DePRODded with reason "Translation of a plwiki article, should probably at least be discussed at AfD." I don't know the notability criteria of the Polish WP and in any case, those are immaterial here. PROD reson stands, hence:
545:. It's pretty hard to gauge the notability of such a niche periodical, but I'm not seeing any of the usual indicators like indexing by selective databases either. But merging to the organisation that publishes it is an obvious
542:
365:
344:
53:
199:
139:
134:
143:
269:
126:
569:
166:
343:. I can't find any evidence of notability for this journal, and the article is currently sourced entirely to primary sources. I was going to suggest a merge or redirect to
591:
417:
130:
549:
in this case, since the article content is encyclopaedic and verifiable. The notability of the merge target isn't something to be discussed in this AfD. –
113:
455:
If the only thing the source is being used for is to say that this journal exists and is affiliated with that institution, why would that be a problem? –
98:
220:
187:
122:
74:
643:
626:
605:
583:
560:
525:
493:
466:
450:
426:
408:
391:
356:
331:
306:
281:
261:
68:
181:
348:
177:
437:
Yes, merging is often the standard solution in these cases. I dislike that solution (here and elsewhere), however, because the
227:
93:
86:
17:
378:
510:. Whether or not to include a journal in the article of its publisher is simply a matter of editorial judgement based on
399:
into parent article is the standard solution in such cases. Valid information, even if does not warrant a separate page.
107:
103:
193:
662:
40:
689:
481:
404:
658:
352:
36:
507:
489:
446:
277:
257:
241:
213:
374:
347:, but that article is also sourced entirely to primary coverage and has unclear notability too.
637:
600:
578:
555:
520:
461:
400:
325:
300:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
657:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
294:: I couldn't find any source that discusses the significance or impact of this publication.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
622:
386:
485:
442:
273:
253:
678:
421:
382:
59:
546:
511:
370:
245:
633:
595:
573:
550:
515:
456:
321:
296:
160:
618:
690:
https://pcma.uw.edu.pl/en/publications/pam-journal-2/pam-publication-ethics/
236:
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any
368:
would be preferable to deletion. No opinion on deletion for now.
653:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
543:
366:
345:
54:
156:
152:
148:
270:
list of
Academic journals-related deletion discussions
212:
679:
https://pcma.uw.edu.pl/en/publications/pam-journal-2/
570:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Studia
Palmyreńskie
502:Notability guidelines (including the insistence on
240:databases, no independent sources. Does not meet
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
665:). No further edits should be made to this page.
592:list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions
590:Note: This discussion has been included in the
416:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
631:Right, but none of that makes its notable. --
319:, as some content has been referenced now. --
226:
8:
114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
418:list of Poland-related deletion discussions
589:
415:
267:
441:source we have is the journal itself. --
671:
508:do not apply to content within articles
123:Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean
75:Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean
634:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
322:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
297:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
24:
99:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
644:11:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
627:10:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
606:18:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
584:18:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
561:18:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
526:07:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
494:22:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
467:17:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
451:23:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
427:20:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
409:20:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
392:14:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
357:13:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
332:11:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
307:12:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
282:10:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
262:10:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
69:15:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
89:(AfD)? Read these primers!
719:
655:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
547:alternative to deletion
482:OMICS Publishing Group
87:Articles for deletion
568:Related discussion:
315:Changing my vote to
608:
604:
586:
582:
559:
524:
465:
429:
284:
104:Guide to deletion
94:How to contribute
67:
710:
703:
698:
692:
687:
681:
676:
640:
598:
576:
567:
553:
518:
459:
424:
390:
328:
303:
231:
230:
216:
164:
146:
84:
66:
64:
57:
34:
718:
717:
713:
712:
711:
709:
708:
707:
706:
699:
695:
688:
684:
677:
673:
669:
663:deletion review
642:
638:
422:
369:
330:
326:
305:
301:
173:
137:
121:
118:
81:
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
716:
714:
705:
704:
693:
682:
670:
668:
667:
649:
648:
647:
646:
632:
610:
609:
587:
564:
563:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
497:
496:
472:
471:
470:
469:
431:
430:
412:
411:
394:
359:
337:
336:
335:
334:
320:
310:
309:
295:
286:
285:
234:
233:
170:
117:
116:
111:
101:
96:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
715:
702:
697:
694:
691:
686:
683:
680:
675:
672:
666:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:
645:
641:
635:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
615:
612:
611:
607:
602:
597:
593:
588:
585:
580:
575:
571:
566:
565:
562:
557:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
536:
527:
522:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:
499:
498:
495:
491:
487:
483:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
468:
463:
458:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
432:
428:
425:
419:
414:
413:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
393:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
363:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
338:
333:
329:
323:
318:
314:
313:
312:
311:
308:
304:
298:
293:
292:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:Find sources:
171:
168:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
115:
112:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
696:
685:
674:
654:
652:
613:
538:
503:
438:
434:
401:Lembit Staan
396:
361:
340:
316:
290:
289:
249:
242:WP:NJournals
237:
235:
223:
217:
209:
202:
196:
190:
184:
174:
80:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
504:independent
349:192.76.8.81
200:free images
639:reply here
512:due weight
486:Randykitty
443:Randykitty
327:reply here
302:reply here
274:Randykitty
254:Randykitty
62:Sandstein
659:talk page
506:sources)
423:Spiderone
238:selective
37:talk page
661:or in a
371:Headbomb
167:View log
108:glossary
39:or in a
614:Comment
435:Comment
362:Merging
206:WP refs
194:scholar
140:protect
135:history
85:New to
619:Aszu23
341:Delete
291:Delete
250:Delete
246:WP:GNG
178:Google
144:delete
539:Merge
397:merge
317:merge
221:JSTOR
182:books
161:views
153:watch
149:links
50:merge
16:<
623:talk
601:talk
594:. –
579:talk
572:. –
556:talk
521:talk
490:talk
462:talk
447:talk
439:only
405:talk
353:talk
278:talk
258:talk
214:FENS
188:news
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
596:Joe
574:Joe
551:Joe
541:to
516:Joe
457:Joe
364:to
244:or
228:TWL
165:– (
52:to
625:)
492:)
449:)
420:.
407:)
385:·
381:·
377:·
355:)
280:)
272:.
260:)
252:.
208:)
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
56:.
636:|
621:(
603:)
599:(
581:)
577:(
558:)
554:(
523:)
519:(
488:(
464:)
460:(
445:(
403:(
389:}
387:b
383:p
379:c
375:t
373:{
351:(
324:|
299:|
276:(
256:(
232:)
224:·
218:·
210:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
180:(
172:(
169:)
163:)
125:(
110:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.