Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Pollen (programming language) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

370:
Additionaly, I believe they might have a connection with the author of the "Pollen" macro system that Emily specified and linked to (the pollen in this article is about a general purpose programming language). The project has been receiving vandalism, pishing and false reports. They also don't seem to have any deep understanding of the Pollen programming language, as they specified they never heard of it (and maybe is one of the reasons they want to delete the article). They also don't seem to have enough knowledge about systems programming languages to even use Pollen.
410:, having seen hundreds of AFD discussions, this article is highly unlikely to be Kept since you are the only vocal supporter of this opinion. You'd have better luck asking for the article to be "Draftified" and moved to Draft space so you could continue to work on it and improve it. Once it is deleted, it is gone. 466:
The Knowledge (XXG) Draft space was created in 2010. It was designed as a space where new articles could be created and worked on without immediately being published to the main Knowledge (XXG) site. The Draft space allows articles to be reviewed and improved by editors before they are moved to the
462:
I tried to userfy the page to as a way to draft it, but it may seem as an attempt to take ownership of it, as you mentioned. The objective was to allow other editors to access the page because I thought the topic would be unlisted in all possible ways. I took some time to learn about drafts today,
369:
I have discussed my reasons to keep the article on my talk page but I've been continuously attacked by Eejit43 and Emily. I believe the quality of the page is good enough for a stub and other Knowledge (XXG) users need to have a chance to discover this article to read and contribute to it.
437:
towards fellow editors. I've read nothing on your talk page that could be considered as an attack; it is your close connection to the topic that makes you perceive them as such. Having emotional detachment from your work on Knowledge (XXG) is
205: 544:: clearly non-notable topic. As such it should not be moved to draft or userspace, especially with the COI concerns. If it becomes notable in the future, they can create a draft at that point. –– 199: 162: 257: 135: 130: 139: 433:
over any article on Knowledge (XXG), even ones you create. Accusing others of have harmful motives without evidence goes against Knowledge (XXG)'s requirement of
122: 94: 109: 282:: Non-notable programming language. Additionally, per the article creator's user page, they've stated they are the creator of this programming language. 429:, editors do not need to have expert-level knowledge of a topic to edit an article about it. Also, It would be a mistake to believe that you have 489:
being the same thing, in case others weren't paying enough attention and thought otherwise. I'd never heard of either of them before this.
220: 330:
I considered nominating this when I left the COI template on the creator's userpage, but was about to go to bed and didn't have time for
187: 89: 82: 17: 467:
main space. This helps ensure that articles meet Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines for quality and accuracy before they are made public.
341:
that is not this one. I don't think that one's notable either, but it's certainly more notable than the one being discussed here.
305:
as one is Github (generally unreliable unless stated as per local consensus) and the other is not independent one (both fail per
558: 536: 509: 476: 454: 421: 379: 361: 322: 291: 273: 249: 64: 181: 103: 99: 396: 177: 126: 575: 40: 504: 356: 166: 227: 118: 70: 287: 60: 442:, which is exactly why we don't like editors writing about topics where they have a conflict of interest. -- 193: 571: 36: 334:
and then kind of forgot about the whole thing. Looking around now, I see nothing to suggest notability.
553: 283: 55: 213: 331: 463:
and it seems I can still link to it from other pages. Drafts are a relatively new feature to me.
267: 243: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
472: 450: 392: 375: 522: 434: 430: 400: 310: 302: 545: 500: 352: 306: 525:. Then I would consider salting due to the above comments from the article's creator. 526: 318: 261: 237: 156: 468: 443: 426: 407: 388: 371: 490: 342: 412: 314: 338: 485:
FWIW, I linked to the other Pollen solely to draw attention to it
566:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
236:
Absolutely no proof of notability, created by a COI editor ~
399:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this 152: 148: 144: 212: 226: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 578:). No further edits should be made to this page. 256:Note: This discussion has been included in the 258:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 8: 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 255: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 301:: Two included sources do not prove 24: 95:Introduction to deletion process 339:another language called Pollen 1: 119:Pollen (programming language) 71:Pollen (programming language) 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 595: 559:06:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 537:01:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 510:23:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 477:14:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 455:06:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 422:04:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 380:01:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC) 362:18:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 323:15:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 292:15:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 274:15:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 250:15:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 65:16:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC) 568:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 167:edits since nomination 385:Note to closing admin 83:Articles for deletion 435:assuming good faith 337:n.b. There is also 404: 276: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 586: 556: 551: 548: 533: 530: 493: 448: 420: 382: 345: 309:, first one per 270: 246: 231: 230: 216: 160: 142: 80: 63: 34: 594: 593: 589: 588: 587: 585: 584: 583: 582: 576:deletion review 554: 549: 546: 531: 528: 508: 491: 446: 411: 360: 343: 284:Hey man im josh 268: 244: 173: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 592: 590: 581: 580: 562: 561: 539: 515: 514: 513: 512: 498: 488: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 464: 364: 350: 335: 325: 295: 294: 277: 234: 233: 170: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 591: 579: 577: 573: 569: 564: 563: 560: 557: 552: 543: 540: 538: 535: 534: 524: 520: 517: 516: 511: 506: 502: 497: 496: 486: 484: 478: 474: 470: 465: 461: 458: 457: 456: 452: 445: 441: 436: 432: 428: 425: 424: 423: 419: 417: 416: 409: 406: 405: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 381: 377: 373: 368: 365: 363: 358: 354: 349: 348: 340: 336: 333: 329: 326: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 297: 296: 293: 289: 285: 281: 278: 275: 271: 265: 264: 259: 254: 253: 252: 251: 247: 241: 240: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175:Find sources: 171: 168: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 62: 61: 58: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 567: 565: 541: 527: 521:as it fails 518: 494: 459: 439: 414: 413: 384: 366: 346: 327: 298: 279: 262: 238: 235: 223: 217: 209: 202: 196: 190: 184: 174: 76: 59: 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 200:free images 572:talk page 440:essential 431:ownership 332:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 574:or in a 397:contribs 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 263:Eejit43 239:Eejit43 206:WP refs 194:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 555:(talk) 547:Formal 542:Delete 523:WP:GNG 519:Delete 469:M4t3uz 444:Drm310 427:M4t3uz 408:M4t3uz 389:M4t3uz 372:M4t3uz 328:Delete 311:WP:SPS 303:WP:GNG 299:Delete 280:Delete 178:Google 140:delete 56:Salvio 50:delete 460:Draft 307:WP:RS 221:JSTOR 182:books 157:views 149:watch 145:links 16:< 550:Dude 532:5969 529:Onel 495:mi1y 473:talk 451:talk 393:talk 376:talk 367:Keep 347:mi1y 319:talk 288:talk 269:talk 260:. ~ 245:talk 214:FENS 188:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 487:not 401:AfD 315:A09 313:). 228:TWL 161:– ( 475:) 453:) 447:🍁 418:iz 403:. 395:• 387:: 383:— 378:) 321:) 290:) 272:) 248:) 208:) 165:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 52:. 507:⧽ 505:C 503:· 501:T 499:⧼ 492:ℰ 471:( 449:( 415:L 391:( 374:( 359:⧽ 357:C 355:· 353:T 351:⧼ 344:ℰ 317:( 286:( 266:( 242:( 232:) 224:· 218:· 210:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 180:( 172:( 169:) 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Salvio

16:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Pollen (programming language)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Pollen (programming language)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.