Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Panchanan Chakraborty - Knowledge

Source 📝

305:: Do note that just because a source is offline or you do not have access to it does not necessarily make it unusable as a source. That being said, the nominator is correct that the one source written by the author is unusable, and the second can't be found. A somewhat thorough search in both English and Bengali returned very little; there are some passing mentions under his alternative name (searches using the article title are clouded as there is a modern professor with the same name), but nothing substantial as far as I can find. This is all in addition to the fact that the article seems to be written in the form of more caste war nonsense. I'm opting to put lean delete because sources 412:, the Oria writer who spent his childhood in Calcutta. My Bangla is not strong enough to do the detailed textual reading (rather than searching) necessary, but given the presence of multiple mentions with regard to his actions within the Bengali elements of the Freedom Movement around Chandra Bose, this is very much a case of it being more than reasonable to assume offline sources exist. For example: Bangla text searching turns up this: "āĻāĻ‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻ•ā§āĻˇā§āĻŦā§āĻ§ āĻ—āĻžā§‡āĻˇā§āĻ ā§€āĻ° āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻ¤āĻŽ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻ¨āĻžāĻ¯āĻŧāĻ• āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻĒāĻžā§āĻšāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¨ āĻšāĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§€" ( "One of the main heroes of this rebellious group was Panchanan Chakraborty") from 614:
Clearly a historical figure. This is the English language encyclopedia of the entire world, not the encylopedia of the English language speaking world. References to sources in languages other than English are entirely acceptable to establish notability, although English sources are preferable when
514:
which these sources don't. Additionally, the article is entirely based upon material written by the subject and a text that we have no publishing information about. We have no way of knowing if the Pabitrakumar Gupta text is self published, or is an essay, or a book, or to what extent the source is
236:
Article is based on two offline sources: one of which was written by the subject and the other by Pabitrakumar Gupta which I can not even find evidence of its existence ( a google search yielded no further information with no hits in libraries, publishers, etc.) With no publisher given, it's not
359:
All in, this confirms that he as a person existed, was at least a mid level figure in revolutionary groups and was (is?) fairly well known in Bengal, but the sourcing as far as I could find is just name dropping here and there. There also appears to be multiple other people with the same name
360:
including his contemporaries which makes finding sources much more difficult. I can't read Bengali and google translation is too poor with Indian language especially for this kind of focused searches, so it's also quite possible that other Bengali language sources exist as well. Pinging
347: 506:. The sources provided by Goldsztajn are brief mentions of the subject and don't contain in-depth coverage of Panchanan Chakraborty. While these sources do make claims about the subject that would seem to indicate some notability, they don't count as RS per the purposes of 52:. A number of leads to sources have opened up during this nomination, and the article creator may yet respond to their ping. If it turns out there's not enough to properly source the article improve we can go again with another AfD. – 403:
for doing the legwork here. Clearly there's a variety of English transliterations of his name. I had attempted some searching a little earlier and got as far as one of the Ray articles, but RL intervened. There's also a
205: 615:
readily available to choose from. A topic covered in reliable, independent sources in Hindi languages is notable for inclusion in the English Knowledge even if English sources on the topic are lacking.
515:
independent or reliable. I really don't see how the keep votes can be justified or supported by wikipedia's notability policies in the face of the lack of significant coverage in RS.
166: 199: 262: 241:
search yielded many sources about a different person, the economist and economics professor Panchanan Chakraborty, but nothing about the revolutionary. Fails
282: 113: 98: 139: 134: 143: 419:. I've left a notification on the article author's page; FWIW, they seem an editor who had an unfrivolous focus in this subject area. Regards, -- 126: 334:
mentions him as an example of inaccuracies in Intelligence Reports where he was represented as the leader of a revolt group in Madaripur,
343: 576: 462:, per Goldsztajn, the mentions indicate notability as a historical figure and AGF with respect to ref 2 provided by article's author. 61: 220: 187: 368:
who may be better able than me at finding sources in this topic area and for confirming whether ref 2 in the article is usable.
409: 93: 86: 17: 181: 107: 103: 649: 624: 606: 583: 549: 524: 498: 481: 452: 428: 387: 318: 294: 274: 254: 68: 558: 437: 417: 130: 177: 668: 40: 580: 494: 472: 378: 65: 227: 572: 57: 339: 664: 448: 122: 74: 36: 620: 424: 490: 464: 370: 213: 193: 645: 602: 568: 520: 314: 290: 270: 250: 82: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
633: 545: 242: 238: 629: 616: 420: 365: 413: 326:, I found some sources which mention him but none that discuss him in any depth; i.e, 637: 533: 507: 641: 598: 594: 537: 516: 351: 342:(note for me to create a page on her) and cites his testimony as a primary source, 310: 286: 266: 246: 160: 632:, what sources in Hindi????? As far as I can see, there aren't any that provide 541: 489:, is notable as a historical figure, although online references are very sparse. 405: 361: 350:(non academic memoir) mentions him as a "legendary name" associated with the 331: 327: 237:
clear that this offline source is even a reliable published resource. A
399: 335: 540:
rightfully points out that "mentions" do not count for notability.
512:"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail 346:
mentions him as an example of flogging by colonial authorities,
659:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
561:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
440:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
416:'s āĻŦāĻžāĻ‚āĻ˛āĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻ—ā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ¯ā§āĻ— āĻ¸ā§‚āĻ°ā§āĻ¯ā§‹āĻĻāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻ“ āĻ¸ā§‚āĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¨āĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻŋ (1997) 330:
mentions him as the leader of revolt groups in Faridpur,
156: 152: 148: 212: 567:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
446:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 671:). No further edits should be made to this page. 281:Note: This discussion has been included in the 261:Note: This discussion has been included in the 226: 8: 263:list of History-related deletion discussions 114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 309:exist, but my best effort turned up zilch. 283:list of India-related deletion discussions 280: 260: 593:: as per nomination. I agree with what 7: 640:for the offline source, of course). 24: 99:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 650:18:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC) 625:17:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC) 607:14:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC) 584:10:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC) 550:18:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC) 525:15:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC) 499:22:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC) 482:14:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC) 69:08:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 453:04:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC) 429:01:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC) 388:02:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 319:04:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC) 295:04:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC) 275:04:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC) 255:03:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC) 89:(AfD)? Read these primers! 688: 336:Chattopadhyay 1984 (p. 73) 661:Please do not modify it. 597:has already pointed out. 32:Please do not modify it. 532:, per nom, for failing 408:as an influence upon 406:mention of him (p.79) 123:Panchanan Chakraborty 87:Articles for deletion 75:Panchanan Chakraborty 638:assuming good faith 414:bn:Arabinda Poddara 340:Santosh Kumari Devi 510:. GNG states that 586: 455: 332:Ray 1980 (p. 460) 328:Ray 1979 (p. 612) 297: 277: 104:Guide to deletion 94:How to contribute 679: 566: 564: 562: 480: 477: 469: 451: 445: 443: 441: 402: 386: 383: 375: 231: 230: 216: 164: 146: 84: 34: 687: 686: 682: 681: 680: 678: 677: 676: 675: 669:deletion review 587: 557: 555: 479: 473: 465: 463: 456: 447: 436: 434: 398: 385: 379: 371: 369: 173: 137: 121: 118: 81: 78: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 685: 683: 674: 673: 655: 654: 653: 652: 609: 565: 554: 553: 552: 527: 501: 491:Jackattack1597 484: 471: 467:Tayi Arajakate 444: 433: 432: 431: 400:Tayi Arajakate 391: 390: 377: 373:Tayi Arajakate 356: 355: 321: 299: 298: 278: 234: 233: 170: 117: 116: 111: 101: 96: 79: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 684: 672: 670: 666: 662: 657: 656: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 628: 627: 626: 622: 618: 613: 610: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 589: 588: 585: 582: 578: 574: 570: 563: 560: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 528: 526: 522: 518: 513: 509: 505: 502: 500: 496: 492: 488: 485: 483: 478: 476: 470: 468: 461: 458: 457: 454: 450: 449:North America 442: 439: 430: 426: 422: 418: 415: 411: 407: 401: 396: 393: 392: 389: 384: 382: 376: 374: 367: 363: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 322: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 301: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 279: 276: 272: 268: 264: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175:Find sources: 171: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 90: 88: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 660: 658: 611: 590: 569:filelakeshoe 556: 529: 511: 503: 486: 474: 466: 459: 435: 410:Prafulla Das 394: 380: 372: 352:Forward Bloc 323: 306: 302: 235: 223: 217: 209: 202: 196: 190: 184: 174: 80: 54:filelakeshoe 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 303:Lean delete 200:free images 630:VocalIndia 617:VocalIndia 421:Goldsztajn 366:Goldsztajn 344:Hasan 2016 665:talk page 634:WP:SIGCOV 397:kudos to 348:Dhar 2009 338:is about 243:WP:SIGCOV 239:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 667:or in a 559:Relisted 438:Relisted 167:View log 108:glossary 39:or in a 642:Curbon7 599:defcon5 595:4meter4 538:4meter4 517:4meter4 504:Comment 324:Comment 311:Curbon7 287:Curbon7 267:Curbon7 247:4meter4 206:WP refs 194:scholar 140:protect 135:history 85:New to 591:Delete 542:Ifnord 534:WP:GNG 530:Delete 508:WP:GNG 178:Google 144:delete 362:Soman 221:JSTOR 182:books 161:views 153:watch 149:links 16:< 646:talk 621:talk 612:Keep 603:talk 546:talk 521:talk 495:talk 487:Keep 475:Talk 460:Keep 425:talk 395:Keep 381:Talk 364:and 315:talk 291:talk 271:talk 251:talk 214:FENS 188:news 157:logs 131:talk 127:edit 307:may 228:TWL 165:– ( 648:) 623:) 605:) 581:🐱 579:) 575:/ 548:) 536:. 523:) 497:) 427:) 317:) 293:) 285:. 273:) 265:. 253:) 245:. 208:) 159:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 142:| 138:| 133:| 129:| 66:🐱 64:) 60:/ 644:( 636:( 619:( 601:( 577:c 573:t 571:( 544:( 519:( 493:( 423:( 354:. 313:( 289:( 269:( 249:( 232:) 224:· 218:· 210:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 180:( 172:( 169:) 163:) 125:( 110:) 106:( 62:c 58:t 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
filelakeshoe
t
c
🐱
08:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Panchanan Chakraborty

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Panchanan Chakraborty
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑