602:, and it demonstrates that it was a fly-by-night outfit functioning on minimal funds. It does prove that the party existed in accordance to local laws, however, at least for a brief period. However, I'm not convinced that this enough to make it notable. I cannot access the article from La Presse, but its title leads one to think that the party is only mentioned in passing. It did not run candidates in any election, as far as I can tell and, as indicated above, news coverage was extremely limited after its founding.
675:
coverage while running for election. For a party, is it enough to have simply existed very briefly, without contesting an election? Because apart from that article and the one from radio-Canada about its founding there's very little out there. I also looked for articles about the party's leader, Aline Lafond, given it seemed to be a one-person outfit, and there's little out there either. So I'm not convinced this outfit is notable, and if it is it just barely scrapes by the general notability criteria.
540:
656:(you'll need to scroll down to page A3 to find the article). The text of the article seems to take up about a quarter of the page, and from my reading of it, it seems to be about the founder of the party, and is a discussion of both her, the party, and how she founded it. I would say it is in-depth for Knowledge (XXG)'s purposes.
701:
about it. It existed, it professed this ideology and these goals, and… that's about it. This is still fundamentally a minor party that folded in two years, before it could even field any candidates; it cannot be said to have made even the smallest ripple in Quebec politics. That it received a degree
674:
Thanks for that, it is actually an in-depth article on the party in a serious newspaper. However, I'm not certain that's enough to establish notability. For politicians, simply having been a candidate is not enough; you have to either have been elected to a notable office or gathered significant
451:
it's in-depth), and that one you linked to from radio-canada.ca. The other two you linked are, as you say, passing mentions, which seem to just state that at one point the party existed. I personally don't see how that shows notability. I wouldn't be opposed to a mention of this party in that
201:
399:
641:
570:
195:
297:
162:
732:
232:
Non-notable political party. Unsourced article; except for a few external links (the party's website now doesn't exist). I can't find any sources for the party either. It was
453:
275:
135:
130:
341:
319:
139:
122:
94:
109:
739:– it may not even count as a political party as it is not listed at Election Canada Registered Political Parties and Parties Eligible for Registration (
511:
216:
183:
89:
82:
17:
752:
740:
719:
684:
667:
611:
584:
564:
525:
498:
467:
427:
376:
355:
333:
311:
289:
267:
177:
64:
735:– "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable..."
103:
99:
173:
600:
407:
242:
No demonstrated notability. Short-lived political party (FR wiki page shows it's defunct) that never ran any candidates.
769:
448:
126:
40:
403:
223:
118:
70:
253:
412:
I only de-prodded because the sources are out there even if the article doesn't reflect them at the moment. –
544:
396:
189:
765:
36:
662:
579:
520:
462:
390:
350:
328:
306:
284:
262:
599:
Comment: The party's lone financial report, covering the years 2005 and 2006, can be accessed here:
743:) – they don't appear to have ever run a candidate in an election, provincial or federal - cheers,
209:
736:
479:
Yeah, definitely! I'll see what I can do later tonight. It's just going to be tough without that
653:
748:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
764:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
618:
233:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
715:
372:
697:
article is certainly a solid source, but I'm left wondering how much there is to actually
657:
574:
532:
515:
474:
457:
345:
323:
301:
279:
257:
680:
607:
456:). Maybe even a bit of a translation/expansion based on that Fr-WP page would be good?
55:
556:
490:
419:
744:
156:
711:
626:
368:
237:
676:
634:
603:
410:
and just applying a redirect though. Not sure it's warranted enough, though.
630:
551:
505:
485:
438:
414:
245:
395:
being particularly noteworthy). However, online I could only find one (
452:
election page you linked to (as it's mentioned in the Fr-WP page
760:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
443:
where are these French language sources though? There's the
252:. However, I can't see any French language sources, and the
706:
and CBC both) is certainly unusual, but does that make it
733:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (organizations and companies)
648:
source has been successful, and a link to that issue of
152:
148:
144:
208:
406:. It could be worth considering mentioning the party
222:
298:list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
772:). No further edits should be made to this page.
447:one on the Fr-WP page (I can't access that, but
340:Note: This discussion has been included in the
318:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:Note: This discussion has been included in the
274:Note: This discussion has been included in the
276:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
621:all participants in this discussion so far
342:list of Quebec-related deletion discussions
320:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
339:
317:
295:
273:
510:thanks for that, I've left a message at
249:
241:
549:Not my best work, but it's a start. –
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
693:. I echo Xuxl's comments above: the
689:I guess I'll downgrade my vote to a
256:only has one (inaccessible) source.
250:French language sources exist for it
24:
398:). I also found passing mentions
538:
95:Introduction to deletion process
731:- political parties fall under
1:
753:05:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
720:19:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
685:14:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
668:23:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
612:14:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
585:22:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
573:for that La Presse article.
565:21:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
526:15:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
499:15:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
468:14:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
428:02:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
377:22:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
356:21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
334:21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
312:21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
290:21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
268:21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
119:Parti conscience universelle
71:Parti conscience universelle
65:14:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
514:to see if anyone can help.
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
789:
762:Please do not modify it.
640:. The request I left at
385:French language sources
32:Please do not modify it.
710:? I'm not convinced. —
569:Just left a request at
244:But then deprodded by
644:for help finding the
389:exist on this topic (
83:Articles for deletion
702:of coverage (from
512:the reference desk
639:
483:article is all. –
358:
336:
314:
292:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
780:
637:
622:
563:
554:
548:
542:
541:
536:
509:
497:
488:
478:
442:
426:
417:
248:who stated that
240:for the reason:
227:
226:
212:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
788:
787:
783:
782:
781:
779:
778:
777:
776:
770:deletion review
624:
552:
550:
539:
537:
530:
503:
486:
484:
472:
436:
415:
413:
169:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
786:
784:
775:
774:
756:
755:
725:
724:
723:
722:
671:
670:
615:
614:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
431:
430:
411:
380:
360:
359:
337:
315:
293:
254:French WP page
230:
229:
166:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
785:
773:
771:
767:
763:
758:
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
727:
726:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
686:
682:
678:
673:
672:
669:
666:
665:
661:
660:
655:
651:
647:
643:
636:
632:
628:
620:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
586:
583:
582:
578:
577:
572:
568:
567:
566:
562:
560:
555:
547:
546:
534:
529:
528:
527:
524:
523:
519:
518:
513:
507:
502:
501:
500:
496:
494:
489:
482:
476:
471:
470:
469:
466:
465:
461:
460:
455:
450:
446:
440:
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
425:
423:
418:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
393:
388:
384:
381:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
357:
354:
353:
349:
348:
343:
338:
335:
332:
331:
327:
326:
321:
316:
313:
310:
309:
305:
304:
299:
294:
291:
288:
287:
283:
282:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
265:
261:
260:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
761:
759:
728:
707:
703:
698:
694:
690:
663:
658:
649:
645:
580:
575:
558:
543:
521:
516:
492:
480:
463:
458:
449:I'm assuming
444:
421:
391:
386:
382:
364:
363:
351:
346:
329:
324:
307:
302:
285:
280:
263:
258:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
691:weak delete
659:Seagull123
576:Seagull123
517:Seagull123
459:Seagull123
367:per nom. —
347:Seagull123
325:Seagull123
303:Seagull123
281:Seagull123
259:Seagull123
196:free images
533:Seagull123
475:Seagull123
383:Weak keep.
58:Sandstein
766:talk page
737:WP:ORGSIG
704:La Presse
695:La Presse
650:La Presse
646:La Presse
481:La Presse
445:La Presse
392:La Presse
37:talk page
768:or in a
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
745:Epinoia
708:notable
633:, and
619:PINGing
234:PRODded
202:WP refs
190:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
729:Delete
712:Kawnhr
627:Kawnhr
369:Kawnhr
365:Delete
238:Kawnhr
174:Google
140:delete
50:delete
642:WP:RX
571:WP:RX
217:JSTOR
178:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
749:talk
716:talk
681:talk
677:Xuxl
654:here
635:Xuxl
608:talk
604:Xuxl
559:Talk
545:Done
493:Talk
454:here
422:Talk
408:here
404:here
402:and
400:here
373:talk
210:FENS
184:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
699:say
652:is
631:MJL
553:MJL
506:MJL
487:MJL
439:MJL
416:MJL
246:MJL
236:by
224:TWL
161:– (
751:)
718:)
683:)
664:Φ
629:,
610:)
581:Φ
522:Φ
464:Φ
387:do
375:)
352:Φ
344:.
330:Φ
322:.
308:Φ
300:.
286:Φ
278:.
264:Φ
204:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
747:(
741:1
714:(
679:(
638:)
625:@
623:(
606:(
561:‐
557:‐
535::
531:@
508::
504:@
495:‐
491:‐
477::
473:@
441::
437:@
424:‐
420:‐
371:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.