Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Peter Lind - Knowledge (XXG)

Source šŸ“

243:
or inclination to verify all of the CVs submitted. Nor do I think that Lind would falsify his own CV, I just point out that reliable independent sources are generally sought for such information, and there is no listing of any works by Lind at several of the museums where he is said to be represented.
242:
I do not assume that the Danish Agency for Culture would falsify this CV -- I presume only that they would publish the CV provided to them by the artist, which makes this not an independent source. The Danish Agency for Culture lists hundreds of artists on their website -- I doubt they have the time
365:
The article has been updating with more documentationĀ : Publications and References to "Database of artworks in Danish state-owned and state-subsidised museums". This database is possible more misinforming than informing. The data has possible not been updater since 1991. Peter Lind are listed two
378:
Museum inventory are known to be mystery, occasionally you hear about a museum who find a Da Vinci in their collection they had for centuries without knowing, or the contrary something they think they have, has got missing. Eye witness reports from artist like in an interview are more reliable,
374:
The entry from The Royal library only list a few of the Portrait they own by Peter Lind, and one with a wrong names. Maybe it better to skip this poor ReferencesĀ ? Even if the credibility of the article has been questioned Ā ?
336:, they would be non-independent, but that is not the case. The Danish Agency's own reputation is at stake and we should presume they are diligent. The CV gives a sufficient number of galleries and museums to meet 166: 271:
doesn't pull up anything for Lind is because it is simply a website search not an index of all photographers represented. On the National Library he comes up, but not for his own photos but as
401:
More documentationĀ : Annual report The Danish Art Foundation 1996, including list of acquisitions, on page 27Ā : Peter Lind Uden titel 1996, foto pĆ„ filmstrimler 24.275 (Price in DKK)
119: 462: 442: 267:
Personally I would have thought that as a state funding agency they do very good diligence indeed, more than a commercial gallery. As regards non-hits on the two photo museums,
379:
they know what they shipped and if they got payed. Also photo documentation are underrated, in wikipedia it's legitm to link to an external text, but not to an external photo.
422: 482: 160: 341: 402: 268: 126: 275:
of Inga Aistrup (1910-1990). But again, not being able to find his own photos isn't a reason to say "there is no listing of any works by Lind"
298:, even if his day job is a graphic designer. A great shame his Lego beer table design only has own website as a non-reliable source. 17: 250: 208: 92: 87: 596: 96: 181: 642: 148: 40: 79: 405:
This external link should not been in the referenceĀ ? I haven't seen this kind detail documentation in any artikelĀ ?
332:
is a credible authority and we have no evidence that they don't fact-check what they publish. If this were a PR firm
272: 403:
http://www.kunst.dk/fileadmin/_kunst2011/user_upload/Dokumenter/Kunstfonden/AArsberetninger/AArsberetning_1996.pdf
349: 306: 280: 230: 142: 638: 57: 36: 371: 367: 337: 295: 198: 138: 623: 602: 557: 526: 494: 474: 454: 434: 414: 388: 353: 310: 284: 254: 234: 212: 61: 410: 406: 384: 380: 345: 174: 569: 538: 505: 188: 302: 276: 226: 588: 553: 490: 470: 450: 430: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
637:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53: 614:, but the article needs attention as it has a promotional tone that should be dealt with. 83: 201:. Claims that he is represented in the collections of major museums cannot be verified. 154: 521: 244: 202: 329: 619: 580: 549: 486: 466: 446: 426: 344:
appears to be a different photographer named Peter Lind, also born around 1961.) --
222: 113: 75: 67: 572:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
541:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
508:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
517: 615: 299: 372:
https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/SoegKunstnerVaerker.do?kunstnerId=14784
368:
https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/SoegKunstnerVaerker.do?kunstnerId=12915
631:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
225:
that makes you think they might falsify an artists' CV?
109: 105: 101: 173: 579:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 548:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 515:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 187: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 645:). No further edits should be made to this page. 463:list of Photography-related deletion discussions 443:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions 361:- Better with little than with poor referenceĀ ? 8: 481:Note: This debate has been included in the 461:Note: This debate has been included in the 441:Note: This debate has been included in the 423:list of Denmark-related deletion discussions 421:Note: This debate has been included in the 269:search at Brandts Museum of Photographic Art 483:list of People-related deletion discussions 480: 460: 440: 420: 366:times as two different people. HereĀ : 197:No indications that this artist meets 300:http://www.peterlind.dk/lego/sofabord 221:- what exactly is it about about the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 603:09:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC) 558:00:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 527:10:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 495:02:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 475:02:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 455:02:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 435:02:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 415:10:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 330:The Danish Agency for Culture 389:21:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 354:17:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 311:18:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 285:18:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 255:12:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 235:03:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 213:23:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 662: 624:17:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 273:publisher and digitaliser 223:Danish Agency for Culture 62:14:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC) 634:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 294:- would appear to pass 48:The result was 605: 560: 529: 497: 477: 457: 437: 370:and here againĀ : 653: 636: 599: 593: 585: 578: 574: 547: 543: 525: 514: 510: 247: 205: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 661: 660: 656: 655: 654: 652: 651: 650: 649: 643:deletion review 632: 597: 589: 581: 567: 536: 516: 503: 346:Dennis Bratland 253: 245: 211: 203: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 659: 657: 648: 647: 627: 626: 608: 607: 606: 576: 575: 564: 563: 562: 561: 545: 544: 533: 532: 531: 530: 512: 511: 500: 499: 498: 478: 458: 438: 399: 398: 363: 362: 356: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 260: 259: 258: 257: 249: 207: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 658: 646: 644: 640: 635: 629: 628: 625: 621: 617: 613: 610: 609: 604: 600: 594: 592: 586: 584: 577: 573: 571: 566: 565: 559: 555: 551: 546: 542: 540: 535: 534: 528: 523: 519: 513: 509: 507: 502: 501: 496: 492: 488: 484: 479: 476: 472: 468: 464: 459: 456: 452: 448: 444: 439: 436: 432: 428: 424: 419: 418: 417: 416: 412: 408: 404: 396: 393: 392: 391: 390: 386: 382: 376: 373: 369: 360: 357: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 324: 323: 312: 308: 304: 303:In ictu oculi 301: 297: 293: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 282: 278: 277:In ictu oculi 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 256: 252: 248: 241: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 227:In ictu oculi 224: 220: 217: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 633: 630: 611: 590: 582: 568: 537: 504: 400: 394: 377: 364: 358: 334:paid by Lind 333: 325: 291: 239: 218: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 49: 47: 31: 28: 338:WP:CREATIVE 296:WP:CREATIVE 199:WP:CREATIVE 161:free images 54:Mark Arsten 407:Fa bene si 381:Fa bene si 76:Peter Lind 68:Peter Lind 639:talk page 522:talk page 487:ā€¢ Gene93k 467:ā€¢ Gene93k 447:ā€¢ Gene93k 427:ā€¢ Gene93k 292:Weak Keep 246:WikiDan61 204:WikiDan61 37:talk page 641:or in a 570:Relisted 539:Relisted 506:Relisted 395:Question 359:Question 251:ReadMe!! 219:Question 209:ReadMe!! 120:View log 39:or in a 583:Mediran 550:LlamaAl 240:Comment 167:WPĀ refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 139:Google 97:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 620:talk 612:Keep 554:talk 518:J04n 491:talk 471:talk 451:talk 431:talk 411:talk 397:- Ā ? 385:talk 350:talk 342:This 326:Keep 307:talk 281:talk 231:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 50:keep 616:Deb 340:. ( 189:TWL 118:ā€“ ( 622:) 601:) 595:ā€¢ 556:) 493:) 485:. 473:) 465:. 453:) 445:. 433:) 425:. 413:) 387:) 352:) 328:ā€” 309:) 283:) 233:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:. 618:( 598:c 591:t 587:( 552:( 524:) 520:( 489:( 469:( 449:( 429:( 409:( 383:( 348:( 305:( 279:( 229:( 193:) 185:Ā· 179:Ā· 171:Ā· 164:Ā· 158:Ā· 152:Ā· 146:Ā· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:Ā· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Mark Arsten
talk
14:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Peter Lind
Peter Lind
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WPĀ refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:CREATIVE
WikiDan61

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘