119:
That's a debatable claim I think. However the 'Superpower
Criteria' are not reliably sourced and should not be used to make these judgements. In fact we, as editors, should not be making these judgements ourselves. What we need is to find reputable academic sources which advance this claim. If
79:
This is absolute nonsense. What are your grounds for making this claim? Any academic sourcing for the contention that China is now a superpower? Why didn't you raise this point on the article talk page first? Quite frankly, looking at your contribution history, I doubt good faith
244:
221:
204:
169:
93:
72:
120:'China is a superpower' has become part of the academic consensus of International Relations then you can edit the relevant articles accordingly. But if you can't find such a source then don't do it (
145:
106:
52:
179:
58:
17:
212:
looks well-referenced. Addresses an important topic- even if China becomes a superpower it could be kept as a historical record.
259:
36:
258:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
217:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
200:
213:
103:
69:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
196:
240:. Discussions can go on the article's talk page but I don't see a criteria for deletion.
121:
49:
241:
192:
161:
137:
85:
68:
China is currently a superpower and therefore, this page is irrelevant
252:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
China meets criteria for superpower as specified on page.--
57:
59:
People's
Republic of China as an emerging superpower
160:by the way (just in case anyone was in any doubt!)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
279:
245:17:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
230:Perhaps we could archive?
222:17:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
205:17:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
170:17:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
146:17:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
107:17:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
94:17:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
73:17:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
53:18:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
255:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
178:Please also see this -
220:
270:
257:
216:
167:
165:
143:
141:
91:
89:
34:
278:
277:
273:
272:
271:
269:
268:
267:
266:
260:deletion review
253:
163:
162:
139:
138:
87:
86:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
276:
274:
265:
264:
248:
247:
234:
233:
232:
231:
225:
224:
214:CanadianCaesar
207:
185:
184:
183:
182:
173:
172:
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
112:
111:
110:
109:
97:
96:
82:
81:
76:
75:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
275:
263:
261:
256:
250:
249:
246:
243:
239:
236:
235:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
219:
218:Et tu, Brute?
215:
211:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
186:
181:
177:
176:
175:
174:
171:
168:
159:
155:
154:
147:
144:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
123:
118:
117:
116:
115:
114:
113:
108:
105:
104:Blog Mav Rick
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
92:
84:
83:
78:
77:
74:
71:
70:Blog Mav Rick
67:
64:
63:
60:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
254:
251:
237:
209:
188:
157:
65:
45:
43:
31:
28:
238:Speedy keep
158:Speedy keep
46:speedy keep
197:deeptrivia
180:Archive 1
242:Ifnord
66:Delete
193:Xdamr
122:WP:OR
80:here.
50:lethe
16:<
210:Keep
201:talk
191:per
189:Keep
166:damr
156:Oh,
142:damr
90:damr
48:. -
203:)
195:.
124:).
199:(
164:X
140:X
88:X
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.