Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/People's jury - Knowledge

Source 📝

169:. This is a type of non-judicial jury that is being closely studied in the UK. The article needs better citations but I don't find it egregiously POV. The "external links" section is obviously the article's sources, and yes, you're not supposed to do it that way but 226:. I think the POV issue is that both headings in the article are "Benefits of ..." - however, the problem is not necessarily the POV but the structure of the article and style of referencing used, which can be solved and is not a reason for deletion. -- 203:. There are citations there, they just aren't in the 'references section'; that's certainly not a deletion argument, however, as that can be solved by pretty much anybody. As to the POV issue, I guess I just don't see it. 132: 72: 271:
I have reverted the article back to close to how I originally wrote it. It looked as though a number of contributors had been confusing
99: 94: 103: 86: 17: 173:. (The term is also in use in China now, for what looks like a kind of advisory civil jury, but that belongs elsewhere.) -- 156: 284: 160: 325: 36: 324:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
307: 288: 261: 232: 181: 56: 152: 280: 303: 230: 90: 209: 178: 252: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
299: 272: 82: 62: 227: 170: 148: 140: 223: 204: 174: 245: 144: 49: 120: 151:); juries are covered in MANY other more-relevant articles (i.e. "Jury"). 200: 196: 318:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
276: 219: 192: 127: 116: 112: 108: 218:. A valid subject for an article, different from the 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 328:). No further edits should be made to this page. 143:, et al.); tons of original research (violates 8: 147:); poorly-written/-worded; biased (violates 70: 7: 139:No references whatsoever (violates 73:Articles for deletion/People's jury 69: 24: 279:. Hacve also added references. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 345: 191:. Subject is a subset of 308:22:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 289:19:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 262:11:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 233:10:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 182:07:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 171:give the newbies a chance 161:04:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 57:00:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 321:Please do not modify it. 222:article as explained by 32:Please do not modify it. 242:- as per above points. 68:AfDs for this article: 61: 153:Mr. P. S. Phillips 260: 336: 323: 259: 257: 250: 243: 199:are a subset of 130: 124: 106: 54: 44:The result was 34: 344: 343: 339: 338: 337: 335: 334: 333: 332: 326:deletion review 319: 253: 246: 244: 126: 97: 81: 78: 66: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 342: 340: 331: 330: 313: 311: 310: 292: 291: 265: 264: 236: 235: 212: 211: 185: 184: 137: 136: 77: 76: 75: 67: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 341: 329: 327: 322: 316: 315: 314: 309: 305: 301: 297: 294: 293: 290: 286: 282: 278: 275:with a legal 274: 273:People's jury 270: 267: 266: 263: 258: 256: 251: 249: 241: 238: 237: 234: 231: 229: 225: 224:User:Dhartung 221: 217: 214: 213: 210: 208: 207: 202: 198: 194: 190: 187: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 134: 129: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 83:People's jury 80: 79: 74: 71: 64: 63:People's jury 59: 58: 55: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 320: 317: 312: 295: 268: 254: 247: 239: 215: 205: 188: 166: 138: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 300:Noor Aalam 195:, just as 298:notable. 281:Matt Stan 228:Snigbrook 206:Celarnor 175:Dhartung 133:View log 149:WP:NPOV 141:WP:CITE 100:protect 95:history 52:JForget 197:melons 128:delete 104:delete 248:Londo 201:fruit 145:WP:OR 131:) – ( 121:views 113:watch 109:links 16:< 304:talk 296:Keep 285:talk 277:jury 269:Keep 240:Keep 220:jury 216:Keep 193:Jury 189:Keep 179:Talk 167:Keep 157:talk 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 46:Keep 306:) 287:) 255:06 177:| 159:) 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 48:-- 302:( 283:( 155:( 135:) 125:( 123:) 85:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
JForget
00:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
People's jury
Articles for deletion/People's jury
People's jury
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:CITE
WP:OR
WP:NPOV
Mr. P. S. Phillips
talk
04:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
give the newbies a chance
Dhartung
Talk
07:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Jury
melons

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.