538:. The first source in the band's article is a local fanzine blurb written by their brother, and the second is from a friendly fan's blog. I can find nothing else beyond the usual social media and self-promotional sites. Their album was just released and only appears in the usual streaming and retail services, with a couple of reprinted press releases, but no reliable reviews or other coverage. Good luck to them as they get started but these Knowledge articles (band and album) are simply attempted promotions for the time being. ---
75:
620:
doesn't mention the band at all. The BBC playlists only indicate a single play on a local radio station. Stereo
Stickman, Planet Singer and Upstream Indie are all promotion/marketing websites inviting artists to submit their music for promotion. Last Minute Musicians and Music Trails are blogs. So
363:
is the newsletter of their local community, and the article was written by... er, the duo's brother. The links to the BBC pages only show an artist page and no indication that there was anything more than a single play on their local radio station. They may be notable enough for an article one day
719:
Davebenphilips and OnlyOneRaider are passionately defending the band and article, and there is nothing wrong with being new to
Knowledge. But this is a site with policies on who/what is included, and it is worth learning why those policies exist. If you love a band, write about them in your blog.
320:
566:
The artist article has been updated and now has more references, these include multiple reliable, independent reviews from notable magazines, and other sources. The article is sufficient enough to pass
887:- I've had a look at the sources in the article and I don't see the coverage in reliable sources that is needed. I concur with the nominator that the sources fail to be independent or reliable. --
659:
as a 'fanzine'; it's an editorially-independent publication. Moreover, the recent addition of reliable, independent sources to the article – a reflection of the significant coverage there is for
381:
511:
82:
273:
314:
705:
You joined
Knowledge just to give your opinion on a deletion discussion? And no, an article written by their own brother is never going to qualify as "objective".
421:
401:
220:
205:
912:
the band achieves sustained notability then the article will follow. Adding additional poor sources will not help this article demonstrate notability.
690:
280:
739:
601:
553:
646:
The first source is, irrespective of its author's relation to the band, an objective article by a journalist. It's also incorrect for
575:. In regards to the separate album article, I agree with the proposed deletion as it doesn't call for a standalone page at present.
466:
461:
91:
784:
694:
470:
246:
241:
121:
828:
Further to my previous vote, the article has again been updated with additional notable and independent sources, this includes
250:
200:
193:
17:
453:
335:
233:
302:
837:
214:
210:
107:
80:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
938:
807:
I've explained above that none of the sources added are reliable, and why. Which ones do you think are reliable?
762:
in the middle of this AfD. The duo seems to be notable, but their EP is not. With more reliable sources added by
40:
686:
676:
296:
845:
735:
597:
580:
549:
153:
292:
934:
921:
896:
875:
871:
849:
816:
812:
791:
744:
714:
710:
634:
630:
584:
558:
523:
519:
503:
499:
457:
433:
429:
413:
409:
393:
389:
373:
369:
58:
36:
237:
780:
137:
111:
342:
682:
672:
449:
328:
96:
229:
64:
841:
763:
726:
647:
593:
576:
540:
143:
74:
905:
866:
definitely isn't reliable - the website states that it's a platform for any aspiring writers.
836:. As previously mentioned, the additional sources make this article sufficient enough to pass
668:
572:
535:
356:
189:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
933:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
917:
867:
808:
706:
626:
515:
495:
441:
425:
405:
385:
365:
802:
772:
767:
308:
440:
I am also nominating the following related page, the duo's self-released EP, which fails
892:
664:
605:
568:
352:
759:
171:
159:
127:
625:
which is a primary source interview in a limited-distribution lifestyle magazine.
487:
267:
106:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
913:
888:
54:
364:
but right now I can't find any information that demonstrates notability.
720:
Knowledge is an encyclopedic resource in which people and things must
858:
There's an ongoing discussion at WP:ALBUMS about the reliability of
724:
for inclusion. That's what the veterans are talking about here. ---
929:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
69:
862:, and the current consensus is that it's not a good source.
100:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
604:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
621:
the only source that could possibly count as reliable is
382:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
483:
479:
475:
263:
259:
255:
327:
512:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
616:There are still no good sources for his article.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
941:). No further edits should be made to this page.
908:; Knowledge is not the place to promote a band,
510:Note: This discussion has been included in the
420:Note: This discussion has been included in the
400:Note: This discussion has been included in the
380:Note: This discussion has been included in the
904:, per nom. I think this is a textbook case of
341:
120:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
90:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
8:
422:list of England-related deletion discussions
221:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
509:
419:
402:list of Music-related deletion discussions
399:
379:
94:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
114:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
766:, the article is good enough to pass
7:
24:
206:Introduction to deletion process
73:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
110:on the part of others and to
922:16:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
897:17:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
876:01:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
850:23:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
817:16:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
792:16:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
745:21:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
715:15:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
635:15:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
585:02:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
196:(AfD)? Read these primers!
59:20:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
958:
559:14:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
524:21:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
504:21:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
434:21:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
414:21:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
394:21:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
374:21:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
758:: The EP was deleted per
679:) 15:31, 10 August (UTC)
931:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
152:; accounts blocked for
122:single-purpose accounts
92:policies and guidelines
663:– means it now passes
695:few or no other edits
590:Note to closing admin
532:Delete band and album
194:Articles for deletion
697:outside this topic.
104:by counting votes.
83:not a majority vote
834:Urbanista Magazine
730:
698:
651:
609:
544:
526:
436:
416:
396:
211:Guide to deletion
201:How to contribute
185:
184:
181:
108:assume good faith
949:
806:
790:
788:
775:
743:
728:
680:
649:
587:
557:
542:
491:
473:
346:
345:
331:
283:
271:
253:
191:
179:
167:
151:
135:
116:
86:, but instead a
77:
70:
34:
957:
956:
952:
951:
950:
948:
947:
946:
945:
939:deletion review
800:
789:
778:
773:
771:
725:
623:Chelsea Monthly
539:
464:
448:
288:
279:
244:
228:
225:
188:
169:
157:
141:
125:
112:sign your posts
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
955:
953:
944:
943:
925:
924:
899:
881:
880:
879:
878:
853:
852:
830:Vents Magazine
822:
821:
820:
819:
795:
794:
777:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
700:
699:
683:Davebenphilips
673:Davebenphilips
640:
639:
638:
637:
611:
610:
561:
528:
527:
493:
492:
438:
437:
417:
397:
359:for this duo.
349:
348:
285:
224:
223:
218:
208:
203:
186:
183:
182:
78:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
954:
942:
940:
936:
932:
927:
926:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
900:
898:
894:
890:
886:
883:
882:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
856:
855:
854:
851:
847:
843:
842:OnlyOneRaider
839:
835:
831:
827:
824:
823:
818:
814:
810:
804:
799:
798:
797:
796:
793:
786:
782:
776:
769:
765:
764:OnlyOneRaider
761:
757:
754:
753:
746:
741:
737:
733:
732:
723:
718:
717:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
701:
696:
692:
688:
684:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:The Knowledge
654:
653:
645:
642:
641:
636:
632:
628:
624:
619:
615:
614:
613:
612:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:OnlyOneRaider
591:
586:
582:
578:
577:OnlyOneRaider
574:
570:
565:
562:
560:
555:
551:
547:
546:
537:
533:
530:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
489:
485:
481:
477:
472:
468:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:Lost the Love
447:
446:
445:
443:
435:
431:
427:
423:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
362:
361:The Knowledge
358:
354:
344:
340:
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
298:
294:
291:
290:Find sources:
286:
282:
278:
275:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
248:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
198:
197:
195:
190:
177:
173:
165:
161:
155:
149:
145:
139:
133:
129:
123:
119:
115:
113:
109:
103:
99:
98:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
72:
71:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
930:
928:
909:
901:
884:
863:
859:
833:
829:
825:
755:
727:
721:
661:Perfect Soul
660:
656:
655:to refer to
648:
643:
622:
617:
589:
563:
541:
531:
494:
439:
360:
350:
338:
332:
324:
317:
311:
305:
299:
289:
276:
230:Perfect Soul
187:
175:
163:
154:sockpuppetry
147:
136:; suspected
131:
117:
105:
101:
95:
87:
81:
65:Perfect Soul
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
868:Richard3120
809:Richard3120
707:Richard3120
693:) has made
667:as well as
627:Richard3120
571:and is not
516:Richard3120
496:Richard3120
426:Richard3120
406:Richard3120
386:Richard3120
366:Richard3120
315:free images
906:WP:TOOSOON
803:Superastig
729:DOOMSDAYER
669:WP:TOOSOON
650:DOOMSDAYER
573:WP:TOOSOON
543:DOOMSDAYER
536:WP:TOOSOON
357:WP:TOOSOON
355:and seems
88:discussion
935:talk page
864:Urbanista
442:WP:NALBUM
144:canvassed
138:canvassed
97:consensus
37:talk page
937:or in a
838:WP:NBAND
785:ICE CUBE
768:WP:NBAND
740:Contribs
691:contribs
602:contribs
554:Contribs
274:View log
215:glossary
176:username
170:{{subst:
164:username
158:{{subst:
148:username
142:{{subst:
132:username
126:{{subst:
39:or in a
826:Comment
774:ASTIG😎
722:qualify
618:EarMILK
467:protect
462:history
321:WP refs
309:scholar
247:protect
242:history
192:New to
140:users:
914:Ifnord
902:Delete
885:Delete
665:WP:GNG
569:WP:GNG
471:delete
353:WP:GNG
351:Fails
293:Google
251:delete
50:delete
860:Vents
781:ICE T
760:WP:G7
488:views
480:watch
476:links
336:JSTOR
297:books
281:Stats
268:views
260:watch
256:links
118:Note:
16:<
918:talk
893:talk
889:Whpq
872:talk
846:talk
832:and
813:talk
756:Keep
736:Talk
711:talk
687:talk
677:talk
644:Keep
631:talk
598:talk
581:talk
564:Keep
550:Talk
534:per
520:talk
500:talk
484:logs
458:talk
454:edit
430:talk
410:talk
390:talk
370:talk
329:FENS
303:news
264:logs
238:talk
234:edit
55:Tone
731:520
652:520
606:AfD
545:520
343:TWL
272:– (
172:csp
168:or
160:csm
128:spa
102:not
920:)
910:if
895:)
874:)
848:)
840:.
815:)
783:•
770:.
713:)
689:•
681:—
671:.
633:)
608:.
600:•
592::
588:—
583:)
522:)
514:.
502:)
486:|
482:|
478:|
474:|
469:|
465:|
460:|
456:|
444::
432:)
424:.
412:)
404:.
392:)
384:.
372:)
323:)
266:|
262:|
258:|
254:|
249:|
245:|
240:|
236:|
178:}}
166:}}
156::
150:}}
134:}}
124::
52:.
916:(
891:(
870:(
844:(
811:(
805::
801:@
787:)
779:(
742:)
738:|
734:(
709:(
685:(
675:(
629:(
596:(
579:(
556:)
552:|
548:(
518:(
498:(
490:)
452:(
428:(
408:(
388:(
368:(
347:)
339:·
333:·
325:·
318:·
312:·
306:·
300:·
295:(
287:(
284:)
277:·
270:)
232:(
217:)
213:(
180:.
174:|
162:|
146:|
130:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
