653:
642:
633:
604:
593:
584:
555:
544:
535:
506:
495:
486:
457:
447:
439:
410:
400:
392:
1014:, that doesn't actually mean that it serves as a propaganda outlet for the teachings that proceed from the Catholic Church's magisterial authority. It's definitely got a Jesuit bias, but it also seems to be typically reliable for factual reporting, just like any other
1033:. There are some issues with the depth of this source (it appears to be about persecution of religious minorities in India more than the organization itself), but it's moot in light of the above two plus the SCMP source.
785:
If a news org. is RS in one category such as "Christian music" doesn't make it RS in reporting controversial info in another category. You'll need reliable NPOV (non pro-Church or pro-Christian related) paper quoting
201:
1377:
isn't used to establish notability, rather it's for usage in articles. Coming back to CBN's video source, at 22:23 you can see clearly the source stand to benefit from a shared POV, which violates the specific
636:
Editorially independent. Contains original and independent opinion and investigation and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject (themselves, they went there).
587:
Editorially independent. Contains original and independent opinion and investigation and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject (themselves, they went there).
538:
Editorially independent. Contains original and independent opinion and investigation and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject (themselves, they went there).
489:
Editorially independent. Contains original and independent opinion and investigation and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject (themselves, they went there).
940:'s analysis as to why several of the in-depth sources do not count towards significant coverage owing to "bias". The editors states multiple times that the sources are biased and thus fail
1050:
282:
983:
is the source discussed in the RSN archive given, which is described in the conversation as a "community newspaper". I don't think there's any reasonable way to conclude that
442:
Editorially independent. Contains original and independent opinion and investigation and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
395:
Editorially independent. Contains original and independent opinion and investigation and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
359:
195:
1387:
1022:
162:
1258:
1295:
1208:
1026:
478:
1061:
302:
527:
384:
109:
94:
413:
While not primarily about
Persecution Relief. Though the website is subscription based but the article contains two paragraphs about the subject.
674:
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using
625:
135:
130:
1343:
per
Mikehawk. The suggestion that coverage in CBN has to be ignored because it is "pro-Christian" is absurd and harmful to the encyclopedia.
1110:
139:
1134:
509:
The entire article that is written independently by Ashlin Mathew depends on persecution data that is provided by the
Persecution Relief.
1233:
1068:
1373:
to establish notability. Hence, we eliminate the publications which are proven to be having undeniable pro-Christian or pro-Church POV.
122:
1038:
1090:
has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are editorially independent of their non-profit organization. —
1011:
952:. Simply put, it is not the case that religiously affiliated papers are considered by the community to be inherently unreliable;
216:
1065:
431:
183:
89:
82:
17:
857:
be able to count as a reliable source for purposes of notability of a center-left politician? Why would it be different here?
748:
596:
1379:
678:
1354:
1183:
103:
99:
1159:
1021:
The 2011 RSN discussion of
Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) doesn't seem to reflect community use of the source.
177:
1025:
generally seems to have found that the source's reliability is context-dependent. The source is listed as reliable
1430:
40:
1411:
1360:
1333:
1312:
1113:
1099:
1044:
922:
897:
874:
817:
780:
742:
720:
314:
294:
273:
254:
64:
910:
760:
712:
173:
1374:
364:
126:
1056:
893:
223:
1426:
702:
265:
36:
1234:"How Hindu extremists are shutting down Christian churches: 'Why are you worshipping a foreign god?'"
1095:
918:
870:
796:
Persecution Relief reported a 59.6 per cent rise in hate crimes against
Christians from 2016 to 2019
369:
1405:
1370:
1329:
812:
694:
450:
310:
290:
249:
209:
1259:"Jharkhand 4th most dangerous state for Christians, claims report | Ranchi News - Times of India"
1003:
726:
547:
118:
70:
189:
1276:
1015:
996:
904:
889:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1425:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1209:"Adivasi Christians face widespread persecution in Chhattisgarh, pressurised into ghar vapsi"
333:
that are independent of the subject. I am providing a few of them in source assessment table.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1391:
1383:
945:
842:
326:
1348:
1288:
1091:
914:
866:
799:
708:
498:
607:
An interview by staff reporter with detailed explanation by founder of the organization.
1399:
1395:
1325:
972:
959:
941:
937:
858:
828:
804:
791:
770:
752:
734:
716:
403:
306:
286:
241:
55:
656:
Religious persecution on the rise in India by HATTIE WILLIAMS. Independently covered.
1366:
1321:
1138:
1126:
1122:
1083:
964:
954:
853:
847:
774:
756:
738:
698:
375:
1133:
including US government sources reporting about the organization's role in covering
1042:. I'm also seeing its persecution reports being referenced all over the place, from
576:
1307:
1130:
766:
730:
645:
236:
156:
1369:
dictates the that multiple reliable sources independent of the NGO should abide
558:
Contains just about all the coverage and report provided by
Persecution Relief.
347:
232:
1382:. All the sources which stick to NPOV and independent policies doesn't provide
1344:
1320:
There are enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources, passes
913:
is not an RS? The nom statement is that there are no citations that are RS. —
1036:
And, there are more sources that appear to give in-depth coverage, including
1010:
published by the magazine's parent company. And, while it's certainly run by
1030:
987:
fits that bill except by completely misreading that RSN discussion. Rather,
794:
meets the criteria, however, it's only referenced for quoting a statistics,
1109:
According to analyzing sources, doesn't qualify any notability guidelines.
992:
1078:
Overall, based upon sources in this thread, the organization appears to
950:
reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective
1129:
as demonstrated above by
Mikehawk10 and DMySon above. I can find many
330:
1421:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1006:
is not about the source's general reliability, but rather the
1029:, for example, though editors would not use it for facts on
979:
does not actually describe that news organization. Rather,
841:. I fundamentally disagree with your mis-application of
460:
The article contains two paragraphs about the subject.
235:
is not met, including all the citations sourced to non-
152:
148:
144:
1257:
Aug 3, ASRP Mukesh / TNN / Updated; 2020; Ist, 13:45.
1086:. The group's activities are on a national scope, and
208:
283:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
837:source is the one listed in Christian music, NOT
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1433:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
222:
8:
1232:Lal, Surinder Kaur; Clark, M. (2019-03-26).
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
1160:"Christians as target during the lockdown"
751:— pro-Christian, conservative bias, fails
340:
303:list of India-related deletion discussions
300:
280:
944:, but this is fatally flawed in light of
701:yet, also reportedly a controversial one
1390:isn't "significant coverage" either see
1294:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
1150:
769:— A Christian news organization, fails
1284:
1274:
1027:WP:WikiProject Christian music/Sources
949:
795:
501:is generally reliable per consensus.
346:Source assessment table: prepared by
7:
1135:Violence against Christians in India
1002:The RSN discussion that focuses on
24:
1188:United States Department of State
1008:specific reliability of a podcast
975:for the alleged unreliability of
729:— A pro-Catholic magazine, fails
651:
640:
631:
602:
591:
582:
553:
542:
533:
504:
493:
484:
455:
445:
437:
408:
398:
390:
95:Introduction to deletion process
999:focused on the Anglican Church.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
888:- I agree with the nominator.
749:Christian Broadcasting Network
597:Christian Broadcasting Network
577:Christian Broadcasting Network
1:
1412:00:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1361:01:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
1023:A more recent RSN discussion
802:weight to a single source. —
65:08:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1334:22:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1313:11:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
1114:22:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
1100:21:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
923:02:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
898:19:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
875:03:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
818:18:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
652:
641:
632:
603:
592:
583:
554:
543:
534:
505:
494:
485:
456:
446:
438:
409:
399:
391:
315:14:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
295:14:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
274:13:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
255:12:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1450:
1386:about the NGO, and solely
672:
343:
1423:Please do not modify it.
911:South China Morning Post
909:Do you believe that the
648:is a reliable resource.
385:South China Morning Post
32:Please do not modify it.
958:is currently listed as
711:— Not a RS for its pro-
599:is generally reliable.
550:is generally reliable.
370:Significant coverage?
83:Articles for deletion
1384:significant coverage
1207:Konikkara, Aathira.
955:The Jewish Chronicle
948:, which states that
865:, not to sources. —
374:Count source toward
327:significant coverage
1380:independence policy
781:previous discussion
761:previous discussion
743:previous discussion
721:previous discussion
697:— No discussion in
695:OZY (media company)
679:source assess table
451:OZY (media company)
325:There are a lot of
1388:quoting statistics
1287:has numeric name (
1263:The Times of India
1088:Persecution Relief
1004:America (magazine)
981:Falls Church Times
971:The link given by
727:America (magazine)
548:America (magazine)
528:America (magazine)
119:Persecution Relief
71:Persecution Relief
1051:Business Standard
968:. In particular:
689:
688:
685:
628:
579:
530:
481:
434:
387:
317:
297:
272:
271:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
1441:
1408:
1402:
1375:WP:BIASEDSOURCES
1357:
1351:
1310:
1300:
1299:
1292:
1286:
1282:
1280:
1272:
1270:
1269:
1254:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1244:
1229:
1223:
1222:
1220:
1219:
1204:
1198:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1180:
1174:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1158:Salam, Ziya Us.
1155:
991:appears to be a
908:
832:
816:
808:
683:
677:
673:
665:
664:
655:
654:
644:
643:
635:
634:
624:
616:
615:
606:
605:
595:
594:
586:
585:
575:
567:
566:
557:
556:
546:
545:
537:
536:
526:
518:
517:
508:
507:
497:
496:
488:
487:
477:
469:
468:
459:
458:
449:
448:
441:
440:
430:
422:
421:
412:
411:
402:
401:
394:
393:
383:
341:
331:reliable sources
270:
264:
253:
245:
227:
226:
212:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1431:deletion review
1406:
1400:
1355:
1349:
1347:(power~enwiki,
1308:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1293:
1283:
1273:
1267:
1265:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1242:
1240:
1231:
1230:
1226:
1217:
1215:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1192:
1190:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1168:
1166:
1157:
1156:
1152:
902:
845:here. Wouldn't
826:
806:
803:
787:
783:
709:National Herald
681:
675:
660:
659:
611:
610:
562:
561:
513:
512:
499:National Herald
479:National Herald
464:
463:
417:
416:
351:
243:
240:
169:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1447:
1445:
1436:
1435:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1337:
1336:
1302:
1301:
1249:
1224:
1199:
1175:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1121:Easily passes
1116:
1103:
1102:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1034:
1019:
1000:
962:at RSP, as is
936:disagree with
927:
926:
925:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
821:
820:
788:
784:
778:
764:
746:
724:
706:
703:WP:RSEDITORIAL
687:
686:
670:
669:
657:
649:
638:
629:
621:
620:
608:
600:
589:
580:
572:
571:
559:
551:
540:
531:
523:
522:
510:
502:
491:
482:
474:
473:
461:
453:
443:
435:
427:
426:
414:
406:
396:
388:
380:
379:
372:
367:
362:
357:
353:
352:
344:
339:
338:
335:
334:
319:
318:
298:
277:
276:
230:
229:
166:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1446:
1434:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1418:
1413:
1409:
1403:
1397:
1393:
1392:WP:SIGCOV#1.2
1389:
1385:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1352:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1297:
1290:
1278:
1264:
1260:
1253:
1250:
1239:
1235:
1228:
1225:
1214:
1210:
1203:
1200:
1189:
1185:
1179:
1176:
1165:
1161:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
998:
995:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
969:
967:
966:
961:
957:
956:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
906:
901:
900:
899:
895:
891:
887:
884:
883:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
855:
850:
849:
844:
840:
836:
830:
825:
824:
823:
822:
819:
814:
810:
809:
801:
797:
793:
789:
782:
777:in coverage.
776:
772:
768:
765:
762:
758:
754:
750:
747:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
725:
722:
718:
714:
710:
707:
704:
700:
696:
693:
692:
691:
690:
680:
671:
668:
663:
658:
650:
647:
639:
630:
627:
623:
622:
619:
614:
609:
601:
598:
590:
581:
578:
574:
573:
570:
565:
560:
552:
549:
541:
532:
529:
525:
524:
521:
516:
511:
503:
500:
492:
483:
480:
476:
475:
472:
467:
462:
454:
452:
444:
436:
433:
429:
428:
425:
420:
415:
407:
405:
397:
389:
386:
382:
381:
377:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
355:
354:
350:
349:
342:
337:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
278:
275:
269:
268:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
247:
246:
238:
234:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1422:
1420:
1371:WP:COISOURCE
1340:
1317:
1266:. Retrieved
1262:
1252:
1241:. Retrieved
1237:
1227:
1216:. Retrieved
1212:
1202:
1191:. Retrieved
1187:
1178:
1167:. Retrieved
1163:
1153:
1145:
1118:
1111:Seddiq Sabri
1106:
1087:
1079:
1055:
1049:
1043:
1039:Vatican News
1037:
1007:
994:150-year-old
989:Church Times
988:
985:Church Times
984:
980:
977:Church Times
976:
965:Deseret News
963:
953:
933:
929:
905:TrangaBellam
890:TrangaBellam
885:
862:
852:
848:The Guardian
846:
839:Church Times
838:
834:
805:
767:Church Times
715:bias, fails
666:
661:
646:Church Times
626:Church Times
617:
612:
568:
563:
519:
514:
470:
465:
423:
418:
360:Independent?
345:
322:
266:
260:
242:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
76:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
1213:The Caravan
1137:.. Another
1012:the Jesuits
930:Strong keep
861:applies to
348:User:DMySon
196:free images
1268:2021-10-08
1243:2021-10-08
1218:2021-10-08
1193:2021-10-08
1169:2021-10-08
1146:References
1092:Mikehawk10
1057:The Tablet
1045:Asia Times
1016:WP:NEWSORG
997:WP:NEWSORG
915:Mikehawk10
867:Mikehawk10
807:Wiki Linuz
263:per above.
244:Wiki Linuz
233:Notability
58:Sandstein
1427:talk page
1401:WikiLinuz
1326:Mahdiar86
1309:SUN EYE 1
1164:Frontline
1031:evolution
973:WikiLinuz
946:WP:BIASED
938:WikiLinuz
843:WP:BIASED
829:WikiLinuz
365:Reliable?
307:Shellwood
287:Shellwood
37:talk page
1429:or in a
1277:cite web
1238:Newsweek
934:strongly
863:articles
800:WP:UNDUE
798:, hence
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
1396:WP:SPIP
1285:|last2=
1184:"India"
1141:source.
1080:clearly
960:WP:GREL
942:WP:NPOV
859:WP:NPOV
792:WP:SCMP
771:WP:NPOV
753:WP:NPOV
735:WP:NPOV
717:WP:NPOV
404:WP:SCMP
356:Source
202:WP refs
190:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
1367:WP:NGO
1345:User:力
1322:WP:GNG
1139:WP:TOI
1127:WP:NGO
1123:WP:GNG
1107:Delete
1084:WP:NGO
886:Delete
775:WP:DUE
759:. See
757:WP:DUE
741:. See
739:WP:DUE
699:WP:RSN
267:Maniik
261:Delete
174:Google
140:delete
1131:WP:RS
1082:meet
993:: -->
854:MSNBC
790:Only
786:them.
731:WP:RS
217:JSTOR
178:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
1407:talk
1394:and
1365:The
1341:Keep
1330:talk
1318:Keep
1296:link
1289:help
1125:and
1119:Keep
1096:talk
1069:more
1066:many
1062:many
1060:and
932:. I
919:talk
894:talk
871:talk
833:The
779:See
773:and
755:and
737:and
323:Keep
311:talk
291:talk
210:FENS
184:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
1054:to
1048:to
851:or
835:CBN
713:INC
667:Yes
618:Yes
569:Yes
520:Yes
471:Yes
432:OZY
424:Yes
376:GNG
329:in
239:. —
224:TWL
161:– (
1410:)
1398:.
1359:)
1353:,
1332:)
1306:-
1281::
1279:}}
1275:{{
1261:.
1236:.
1211:.
1186:.
1162:.
1098:)
1064:,
921:)
896:)
873:)
813:💬
811:(
733:,
719:,
682:}}
676:{{
378:?
313:)
305:.
293:)
285:.
250:💬
248:(
237:RS
204:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
1404:(
1356:ν
1350:π
1328:(
1324:.
1298:)
1291:)
1271:.
1246:.
1221:.
1196:.
1172:.
1094:(
1071:.
1018:.
917:(
907::
903:@
892:(
869:(
831::
827:@
815:)
763:.
745:.
723:.
705:.
684:.
662:✔
613:✔
564:✔
515:✔
466:✔
419:✔
309:(
289:(
252:)
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.