365:. The citation counts are not actually bad for such a low-citation subject but they become much less impressive when one realizes that two of the top five listed in Google Scholar are edited volumes and one more is an erratum. A few reviews for a couple of edited volumes don't count for much, certainly not enough for
206:
262:
447:
asks for. Nor does it seem like those two co-edited collections attracted more than a baseline level of attention. I'm not seeing prestigious awards or journal editorships, either.
392:
456:
322:
302:
200:
159:
402:. The article does not make the case that the subject is notable (under any of the notability criteria), and some outside effort has also failed to make the case.
282:
342:
106:
91:
443:, but his two books were co-edited collections rather than treatises he authored himself. I'd hesitate to call that the kind of "body of work" that
242:
383:
The entry for the erratum appears to be Google
Scholar being weird and combining citations to the erratum with those for the original paper.
166:
132:
127:
136:
119:
86:
79:
17:
221:
188:
100:
96:
436:
To evaluate someone who works in the philosophy of mathematics, I'd look for book reviews first, and a few do exist
473:
424:
40:
182:
374:
350:
330:
310:
290:
270:
250:
428:
411:
378:
354:
334:
314:
294:
274:
254:
178:
61:
123:
469:
452:
388:
36:
228:
420:
57:
115:
67:
370:
214:
437:
346:
326:
306:
286:
266:
246:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
468:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
448:
444:
407:
384:
366:
194:
238:
53:
153:
403:
237:
No claims of non-academic notability, and no evidence that he passes the
441:
439:
464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
263:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
419:
does not meet any of the inclusion criteria for academics.
149:
145:
141:
213:
245:didn't turn up any further evidence of notability.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
476:). No further edits should be made to this page.
341:Note: This discussion has been included in the
323:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
321:Note: This discussion has been included in the
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
303:list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions
227:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
340:
320:
300:
283:list of Logic-related deletion discussions
280:
260:
343:list of Ohio-related deletion discussions
369:. And there seems to be nothing else. —
7:
445:the notability guideline for authors
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
493:
457:23:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
429:16:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
412:16:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
393:23:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
379:16:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
355:16:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
335:16:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
315:16:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
295:16:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
275:16:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
255:16:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
466:Please do not modify it.
62:22:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
243:a relevant Wikiproject
239:average professor test
80:Articles for deletion
421:John Pack Lambert
357:
337:
317:
297:
277:
241:. Discussion at
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
484:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
480:
474:deletion review
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
479:
478:
460:
459:
431:
414:
397:
396:
395:
371:David Eppstein
359:
358:
338:
318:
298:
278:
235:
234:
171:
116:Philip Ehrlich
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
68:Philip Ehrlich
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
477:
475:
471:
467:
462:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
440:
438:
435:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
465:
463:
433:
416:
399:
362:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
201:free images
449:XOR'easter
385:XOR'easter
54:Malcolmxl5
470:talk page
367:WP:AUTHOR
37:talk page
472:or in a
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
434:Delete
417:Delete
404:Mgnbar
400:Delete
363:Delete
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
453:talk
425:talk
408:talk
389:talk
375:talk
351:talk
331:talk
311:talk
291:talk
271:talk
251:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
347:JBL
327:JBL
307:JBL
287:JBL
267:JBL
247:JBL
229:TWL
158:– (
455:)
427:)
410:)
391:)
377:)
353:)
345:.
333:)
325:.
313:)
305:.
293:)
285:.
273:)
265:.
253:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
451:(
423:(
406:(
387:(
373:(
349:(
329:(
309:(
289:(
269:(
249:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.