434:(local gadfly of WP:NOT#NEWS variety, no eternal historical impact), and fails WP:PROF (main claim to notability as I see it is via book co-authored Jeffrey Lang, and the most common blurb I see for the book mentions it containing Lang's dissertation work). Given the long history of this article, and the failure of it to show a consistent trend towards accumulating stronger claims to notability, I suggest a re-
301:
is passable but weak. It is true that he was the editor-in-chief of Ulam
Quaterly, which may indeed have been the first online math journal. However, the journal's existence was fairly brief (1992-96) and it never really managed to get off the ground. Notability from editing Grothendieck's notes is
469:
The version linked to by Salix Alba contains one possibly notable claim: an on-line mathematics magazine (unnamed) from 1987, and a write-in campaign for governor of
Florida in a race for which our article lists 147 total write-ins. I don't think that's enough.
245:. In the past this has been a problematic article, the subject has edited the article himself adding lots of positive spin, there is also quite a lot of negative press about him (see deletion log). There are sources aplenty see for example
302:
derivative. In terms of his own work, MathSciNet shows 33 papers (the last one in 1996), none are widely cited. WebOfScience shows top citation hits in single digits for his papers. Similarly, little in terms of citability in GoogleScholar
333:
decision to unsalt was based on "Significant new information has come to light since the deletion." but reading this new bio, I see no new information, no claim to notability even (failed candidates for local office fail
260:, an being involved with an early online mathematics journal Ulam Quarterly. Balancing the negative press and the subjects account would be a tricky task and the only stable state for the article seems to be a stub. --
84:
217:
89:
79:
155:
330:
96:
74:
308:. Still, for a mathematician, I would want to see some more direct evidence in terms of citability. If judged purely as an academic under
312:, I would probably have !voted "weak keep". I am not sure about the political activities and the past problems with this article on WP.
17:
389:
122:
117:
483:
464:
447:
422:
393:
371:
347:
321:
286:
269:
232:
205:
191:
169:
57:
126:
109:
501:
36:
385:
500:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
228:
201:
196:
Also, this should be the fourth nomination, not the second. Also,this was deleted in the first and second AfD.
187:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
431:
410:
335:
305:. However, his book with Jeffrey Lang on Zariski surfaces is widely held in academic libraries per WorldCat
303:
257:
113:
479:
367:
265:
443:
418:
343:
224:
197:
183:
163:
306:
105:
63:
282:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
406:
309:
298:
460:
402:
475:
363:
317:
261:
249:
338:, and a weak claim to pass WP:PROF). Does anyone know what this "new information" was?
439:
414:
339:
294:
for the moment. I am not sure about his notability as a politician (the older version
179:
278:
49:
143:
456:
401:
The article fails to demonstrate that the subject is notable in any way. Fails
178:
Non notable failing candidate. He might be notable some day, but not now. Fails
313:
359:
which was a complete rewrite differening markedly from the deleted version
329:
I remember this article from previous AfDs (this is it's fourth). The
162:
Still doesn't seem to meet notability guideliens. No sources found.
494:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
97:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion_review/Log/2007_January_24#Piotr_Blass
297:
does cite quite a few sources) but academic notability under
218:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
248:. Mathematically he is borderline notable for his work on
360:
357:
295:
246:
150:
139:
135:
131:
85:
Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass (Second nomination)
90:
Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass (third nomination)
80:Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
504:). No further edits should be made to this page.
252:, being editor and translator of influential
8:
362:(I've just restored this for comparison). --
216:: This debate has been included in the
72:
430:I think his political activities fail
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
254:Elements of Algebraic Geometry Five
70:
24:
75:Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass
277:history is quite clear here. --
1:
484:00:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
465:19:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
448:19:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
423:11:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
394:07:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
372:09:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
348:04:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
322:14:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
287:12:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
270:08:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
233:06:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
206:05:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
192:05:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
170:05:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
58:20:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
521:
497:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
386:Pharaoh of the Wizards
258:Alexander Grothendieck
69:AfDs for this article:
455:as per Pete Hurd. --
438:ing is appropriate.
168:and his otters •
44:The result was
482:
235:
221:
512:
499:
478:
222:
212:
166:
165:Ten Pound Hammer
153:
147:
129:
34:
520:
519:
515:
514:
513:
511:
510:
509:
508:
502:deletion review
495:
476:Septentrionalis
453:Delete and salt
356:I think it was
275:Delete and salt
250:Zariski surface
239:Delete and salt
164:
149:
120:
104:
101:
94:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
518:
516:
507:
506:
489:
487:
486:
467:
450:
425:
396:
378:
377:
376:
375:
351:
350:
324:
289:
272:
236:
225:David Eppstein
210:
209:
208:
160:
159:
100:
99:
93:
92:
87:
82:
77:
71:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
517:
505:
503:
498:
492:
491:
490:
485:
481:
477:
473:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:WP:POLITICIAN
429:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:WP:POLITICIAN
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
379:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:WP:POLITICIAN
332:
328:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
243:leave as stub
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
157:
152:
145:
141:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
98:
95:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
496:
493:
488:
471:
452:
435:
427:
398:
381:
326:
291:
274:
253:
242:
238:
213:
175:
161:
48:& salt.
45:
43:
31:
28:
472:Weak delete
384:As per nom.
106:Piotr Blass
64:Piotr Blass
480:PMAnderson
413:, fails.
364:Salix alba
262:Salix alba
440:Pete.Hurd
415:Dolphin51
340:Pete.Hurd
409:, fails
405:, fails
327:question
156:View log
407:WP:PROF
310:WP:PROF
299:WP:PROF
292:Neutral
279:Buridan
198:Undeath
184:Undeath
123:protect
118:history
50:Rjd0060
457:Crusio
428:delete
403:WP:BIO
399:Delete
382:Delete
176:Delete
151:delete
127:delete
46:Delete
314:Nsk92
154:) – (
144:views
136:watch
132:links
16:<
461:talk
444:talk
436:salt
419:talk
390:talk
368:talk
344:talk
318:talk
283:talk
266:talk
229:talk
214:Note
202:talk
188:talk
180:WP:N
140:logs
114:talk
110:edit
54:talk
256:by
241:or
220:.
474:.
463:)
446:)
421:)
392:)
370:)
346:)
331:DR
320:)
285:)
268:)
231:)
204:)
190:)
182:.
142:|
138:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
56:)
459:(
442:(
417:(
388:(
374:.
366:(
342:(
316:(
281:(
264:(
227:(
223:—
200:(
186:(
158:)
148:(
146:)
108:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.