Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Prakritir Pratisodh - Knowledge

Source 📝

259: 563:. There may well be works by Tagore that lack notability because they’ve never been discussed in critical literature in English, Bengali or Hindi, it they must be pretty few and far between. We may well not need an article on every single thing he ever wrote, but these will be edge cases rather than the norm. A simple BEFORE search shows an abundance of discussion of this work in RIS. 545:
and Arms & Hearts' excellent additions. The play has been discussed in academic literature, including an entire book chapter. As Phil Bridger says, comparing non-Western authors to Shakespeare is likely to be a sign of bias, because there aren't a lot of Bengali authors who "y'know, everyone has
462:
It doesn't even tell us if the play was ever produced, if so, what theatre(s) it was produced in, when, and how long the production(s) ran. If it was not produced, or produced only a few times for relatively short runs, then it should simply be mentioned in the playwright's article concerning his
388:
is clearly met: Tagore is a Nobel laureate and arguably the most significant figure in Indian literature. That criterion doesn't require that we have articles for every book he ever wrote, but those, such as this, where a measure of sourcing can be found should certainly be kept. The sources
338:
I'm not sure what "claiming notability" would look like exactly—few of our article say "x is notable because..."—but I think the quotation from Tagore that I've added to the lede, on the significance of the play within his oeuvre, might address this concern.
439:
I've expanded the article somewhat, though it's still a stub (someone with access to the full Bhattacharya chapter could expand it further, I think). You're of course entitled to still feel it's non-notable, but it no longer "tells us nothing".
209: 203: 162: 276: 295: 109: 94: 489:. He was every bit as important to Bengali, and wider South Asian, literature as William Shakespeare was to English literature or Confucius to Chinese. 135: 130: 169: 139: 240:
No evidence of notability. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author.
398: 122: 397:. It strikes me as likely that sources in Indian languages, which I'm not able to find as I only speak English, will also exist. Given 224: 191: 89: 82: 17: 467:
for example, so important that he is a required subject of study for most students who read English Knowledge, or even
103: 99: 185: 513: 445: 406: 344: 622: 601: 572: 555: 531: 498: 480: 449: 427: 410: 370: 348: 326: 306: 287: 249: 64: 639: 423: 40: 181: 389:
currently in the article, all of which are high-quality academic books, may well also be sufficient to satisfy
126: 597: 231: 494: 592:
are available (just gsearch, gbooks) that cover this play, article now contains some that reflects this.
401:, it isn't reasonable, as the nominator seems to suggest, to discuss each of his works in his article. – 635: 36: 441: 402: 340: 418:
point 5 needs to be scapped if it justifies keeping an article that tells us nothing as this one does.
434: 419: 551: 527: 486: 217: 118: 70: 593: 476: 366: 322: 245: 197: 568: 490: 299: 280: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
634:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
618: 610: 581: 317:. The article does not even claim notability. It merely says that the play exists. -- 547: 523: 55: 585: 542: 472: 390: 362: 333: 318: 264: 241: 589: 564: 394: 385: 156: 464: 614: 468: 463:
development as an artist. As for Rabindranath Tagore, he was not, like
630:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
253: 516:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
152: 148: 144: 216: 522:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 642:). No further edits should be made to this page. 294:Note: This discussion has been included in the 275:Note: This discussion has been included in the 230: 8: 277:list of Theatre-related deletion discussions 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 296:list of India-related deletion discussions 293: 274: 361:OK, I've added more below to explain. -- 485:I beg to differ with your assessment of 471:who, y'know, everyone has heard of. -- 7: 24: 257: 95:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 659: 573:15:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 556:14:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 532:14:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC) 499:09:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC) 481:01:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC) 450:21:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 428:18:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 411:20:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 371:01:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC) 349:21:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 327:18:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 307:12:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 288:12:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 250:08:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC) 613:, notable author's work. 632:Please do not modify it. 399:Tagore's prolific career 32:Please do not modify it. 623:19:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 602:05:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 267:is a blocked sockpuppet 65:18:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 584:(nos. 1 & 5), and 83:Articles for deletion 590:independent sources 487:Rabindranath Tagore 119:Prakritir Pratisodh 71:Prakritir Pratisodh 534: 442:Arms & Hearts 420:John Pack Lambert 403:Arms & Hearts 341:Arms & Hearts 309: 290: 271: 270: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 63: 650: 521: 519: 517: 438: 393:and point #1 of 337: 304: 285: 261: 260: 254: 235: 234: 220: 172: 160: 142: 80: 62: 60: 53: 34: 658: 657: 653: 652: 651: 649: 648: 647: 646: 640:deletion review 535: 512: 510: 435:Johnpacklambert 432: 331: 300: 281: 258: 177: 168: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 656: 654: 645: 644: 626: 625: 604: 575: 558: 520: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 455: 454: 453: 452: 413: 384:. Point #5 of 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 354: 353: 352: 351: 311: 310: 291: 269: 268: 262: 238: 237: 174: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 655: 643: 641: 637: 633: 628: 627: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 605: 603: 599: 595: 594:Coolabahapple 591: 587: 583: 579: 576: 574: 570: 566: 562: 559: 557: 553: 549: 546:heard of." — 544: 540: 537: 536: 533: 529: 525: 518: 515: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 451: 447: 443: 436: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 414: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 387: 383: 380: 379: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 350: 346: 342: 335: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 313: 312: 308: 305: 303: 297: 292: 289: 286: 284: 278: 273: 272: 266: 265:User:Mopswade 263: 256: 255: 252: 251: 247: 243: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179:Find sources: 175: 171: 167: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 631: 629: 606: 577: 560: 538: 511: 491:Phil Bridger 415: 381: 314: 302:CAPTAIN RAJU 301: 283:CAPTAIN RAJU 282: 239: 227: 221: 213: 206: 200: 194: 188: 178: 165: 76: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 588:, multiple 465:Shakespeare 204:free images 58:Sandstein 636:talk page 548:Toughpigs 524:Sulfurboy 469:Confucius 37:talk page 638:or in a 611:WP:NBOOK 582:WP:NBOOK 580:, meets 514:Relisted 473:Ssilvers 363:Ssilvers 334:Ssilvers 319:Ssilvers 242:Mopswade 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 565:Mccapra 210:WP refs 198:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 609:meets 586:WP:GNG 543:WP:HEY 416:Delete 391:WP:GNG 315:Delete 182:Google 140:delete 615:Cedix 395:WP:BK 386:WP:BK 225:JSTOR 186:books 170:Stats 157:views 149:watch 145:links 16:< 619:talk 607:Keep 598:talk 578:Keep 569:talk 561:Keep 552:talk 541:per 539:Keep 528:talk 495:talk 477:talk 446:talk 424:talk 407:talk 382:Keep 367:talk 345:talk 323:talk 246:talk 218:FENS 192:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 50:keep 232:TWL 161:– ( 621:) 600:) 571:) 554:) 530:) 497:) 479:) 448:) 440:– 426:) 409:) 369:) 347:) 339:– 325:) 298:. 279:. 248:) 212:) 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 52:. 617:( 596:( 567:( 550:( 526:( 493:( 475:( 444:( 437:: 433:@ 422:( 405:( 365:( 343:( 336:: 332:@ 321:( 244:( 236:) 228:· 222:· 214:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 184:( 176:( 173:) 166:· 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
18:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Prakritir Pratisodh

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Prakritir Pratisodh
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.