Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Primou - Knowledge

Source 📝

178:) to support the claim of its awesomeness. So like if it got some good write-ups in trade magazines or professional journals or something, it could still be somewhat notable, even if it never caught on. A large part of the concern with notability is actually derived from the fact that it's hard to find reliable information about stuff that isn't well-known or remarkable (see 118:
Note that I only got 405 hits for "PRIMOU"+"Genome". In some cases it is necessary to be cautious about counting google hits. They can include advertisements and mirrors. But a rename would work for me, although I'd be interested in seeing the whole topic of software analysis of the genome be better
132:
article would be very nice to have. I will add it to my lengthy to-do list, although I won't be able to do it justice on my own. I do think there would be several programs that would be worthy of their own article. PRIMO+PRIMOU would be one. GCG Wisconsin Package would be another (176,000 Google
105:
processing packages. If you Google on "PRIMO"+"Genome", you get over 86,000 hits. "PRIMOU"+"Genome" gets less than 1,000 hits. Therefore, I think PRIMO is plenty notable. We should move the article to PRIMO, and include a section on PRIMOU.
89:— NN. Appears to be a very esoteric piece of software of interest to a small community. If the page described a notable algorithm or if the s/w had won some distinctive award... maybe. But right now I'm not seeing it. Sorry. :) — 186:
some articles about it somewhere, references in the article would go a long way toward establishing its notability and thereby its keepability.
17: 156:. That way it is not lost in space. PRIMOU a strong improvement over PRIMO, but you only care about popularity, not quality. 76:
Appears to be a non-notable extension to a non-notable piece of software. Only incoming link created by the page's author
174:
Notability isn't quite synonymous with popularity...but there has to be something other than the editor's opinion (see
129: 212: 36: 211:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
191: 195: 169: 160: 140: 123: 113: 93: 80: 64: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
70: 187: 61: 175: 157: 134: 107: 179: 166: 120: 90: 165:
Untrue. I suspect that most people here like both notability and quality. :) —
77: 49: 133:
hits under that name alone, and it has gone by several different names).
102: 205:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
119:
developed, rather than having individual package pages. —
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 215:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 101:- PRIMOU is derived from PRIMO. Both are 7: 24: 130:genome sequence analysis software 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 44:The result of the debate was 232: 196:16:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 170:15:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 161:07:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 141:02:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 124:15:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 114:23:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 94:20:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 81:09:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 65:07:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 208:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 128:I agree that a bigger 182:). Which, if there 223: 210: 58: 55: 52: 34: 231: 230: 226: 225: 224: 222: 221: 220: 219: 213:deletion review 206: 154:join with PRIMO 99:Keep and rename 74: 56: 53: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 229: 227: 218: 217: 201: 200: 199: 198: 172: 158:Michael Janich 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 96: 73: 68: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 228: 216: 214: 209: 203: 202: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 171: 168: 164: 163: 162: 159: 155: 151: 148: 142: 138: 137: 131: 127: 126: 125: 122: 117: 116: 115: 111: 110: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 88: 85: 84: 83: 82: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 63: 59: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 207: 204: 183: 153: 149: 135: 108: 98: 86: 75: 46:NO CONSENSUS 45: 43: 31: 28: 188:NickelShoe 136:Johntex 109:Johntex 103:genome 87:Delete 71:Primou 176:WP:OR 78:Pak21 16:< 192:Talk 180:WP:V 150:Keep 62:Talk 184:are 167:RJH 152:or 121:RJH 91:RJH 194:) 139:\ 112:\ 60:| 48:. 190:( 57:P 54:I 51:J

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
JIP
Talk
07:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Primou
Pak21
09:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
RJH
20:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
genome
Johntex
23:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
RJH
15:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
genome sequence analysis software
Johntex
02:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Michael Janich
07:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
RJH
15:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
WP:OR
WP:V
NickelShoe
Talk
16:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.