682:. I do not give much weight to the 30 under 30 source, as it is (at least in this case) given for promise rather than accomplishment. The Vogue source, I do take seriously, and such mainstream coverage would normally convince me to !vote keep. But that article (like the Forbes one) is based entirely on her promise, and not yet on her
686:
accomplishments; it moreover does not seem to be intellectually independent of the Forbes article. If she were to give up science tomorrow, and we were reviewing the article in 10 years, I think it would be an unambiguous delete. Since notability is not temporary, this leaves me !voting weak delete
198:
538:
658:. Notability will have to be sought in the public relations activities. None of the keep votes say which category of notability they think she passes. I would be interested to know.
258:
229:
not yet notable. not an independent scientist , but a post-doc. The many 30-under-30. lists are best seen as promotional , but if they mean anything they mean , not yet notable.
159:
294:
254:
192:
443:
426:
409:
91:
106:
259:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/elliekincaid/2018/01/21/from-bionic-limbs-to-dinosaurs-30-under-30-europe-in-science-and-healthcare/?sh=5b17d14e1616
346:
uh yeah, hence why I didn't mention it as unreliable... Whether a 60 word profile and one sentence mention is sigcov is a different question.
255:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2019/11/05/powerful-people-use-more-abstract-language-according-to-new-research/?sh=15b7ead53bbf
500:
132:
127:
578:
as notable. "Someone is a postdoc" does not inherently strip them of notability much as not every independent scientist rises to it.
86:
79:
17:
136:
119:
655:
353:
307:
213:
100:
96:
180:
717:
40:
561:. The notoriety on Knowledge (XXG) is the existence of multiple secondary and reliable sources that cover the topic.
463:: She has her work mentioned by secondary and reliable sources. She was even included by Forbes in the list feature
583:
520:
list could put anybody in the category of notability no matter if they're a celebrity or in this case a scientist.
634:
396:
174:
696:
648:
496:
700:
667:
638:
612:
587:
570:
550:
529:
504:
476:
452:
435:
418:
400:
359:
341:
313:
240:
170:
61:
713:
579:
36:
622:
596:
220:
663:
630:
608:
525:
392:
688:
692:
566:
472:
206:
123:
376:
297:
546:
487:
464:
250:
683:
626:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
712:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
651:
600:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
319:
265:
186:
57:
659:
604:
521:
562:
468:
447:
430:
413:
115:
67:
542:
384:
347:
301:
236:
388:
380:
153:
53:
231:
391:. That's notability now and our personal opinions are irrelevant.
629:
and so has "no official status" and so is not a reason to delete.
253:
They have articles about her work and quote her in this article
708:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
251:
https://www.forbes.com/profile/priyanka-joshi/?sh=7297005e4049
539:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
650:
in a very high-cited field are not anywhere near passing
149:
145:
141:
296:
is an unreliable source (by a forbes contributor; see
205:
599:. Off to a reasonable start but nowhere near passing
262:
The 2018 Europe 30 Under 30 In
Science And Healthcare
219:
318:The other one is by a staff writer so it counts.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
720:). No further edits should be made to this page.
537:Note: This discussion has been included in the
442:Note: This discussion has been included in the
425:Note: This discussion has been included in the
408:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
444:list of Biology-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
536:
441:
427:list of India-related deletion discussions
424:
410:list of Women-related deletion discussions
407:
647:The subject's science citation levels
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
654:. They may improve with time but
92:Introduction to deletion process
1:
249:Forbes has a profile of her.
701:09:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
668:00:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
639:22:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
613:21:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
588:19:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
571:02:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
551:19:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
530:15:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
505:15:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
477:02:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
453:22:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
436:22:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
419:22:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
401:21:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
360:17:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
342:17:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
314:16:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
241:19:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
62:06:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
467:. This is not promotional.
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
737:
710:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
287:20:05, 13 January 2021
257:and have her listed at
484:per all of the above.
656:WP:Not a crystal ball
80:Articles for deletion
465:300 young innovators
379:ranks her alongside
375:Apart from Forbes,
553:
455:
438:
421:
358:
312:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
728:
580:Vaticidalprophet
503:
494:
490:
450:
433:
416:
350:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
304:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
736:
735:
731:
730:
729:
727:
726:
725:
724:
718:deletion review
492:
486:
485:
448:
431:
414:
356:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
310:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
734:
732:
723:
722:
704:
703:
693:Russ Woodroofe
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
642:
641:
617:
616:
590:
573:
555:
554:
533:
532:
507:
479:
457:
456:
439:
422:
404:
403:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
352:
306:
289:
288:
227:
226:
163:
116:Priyanka Joshi
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
68:Priyanka Joshi
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
733:
721:
719:
715:
711:
706:
705:
702:
698:
694:
690:
685:
681:
678:
677:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
646:
645:
644:
643:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
591:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
572:
568:
564:
560:
557:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
506:
502:
498:
493:Pigsonthewing
489:
483:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
458:
454:
451:
445:
440:
437:
434:
428:
423:
420:
417:
411:
406:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:Ruth Davidson
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
361:
357:
355:
349:
345:
344:
343:
340:
339:
317:
316:
315:
311:
309:
303:
299:
295:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
285:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
233:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
709:
707:
679:
592:
575:
558:
517:
513:
509:
501:Andy's edits
497:Talk to Andy
488:Andy Mabbett
481:
460:
389:Amal Clooney
381:Megan Markle
372:
351:
320:
305:
266:
261:
246:
230:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
680:Weak delete
623:WP:Too soon
597:WP:Too soon
193:free images
689:WP:TOOSOON
660:Xxanthippe
605:Xxanthippe
563:✍A.WagnerC
522:Trillfendi
512:I believe
469:✍A.WagnerC
714:talk page
449:Spiderone
432:Spiderone
415:Spiderone
298:WP:FORBES
37:talk page
716:or in a
687:now per
684:WP:NPROF
543:TJMSmith
348:Eddie891
302:Eddie891
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
652:WP:Prof
601:WP:Prof
559:Comment
510:Comment
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
631:Andrew
625:is an
593:Delete
518:Forbes
516:and a
393:Andrew
171:Google
137:delete
54:Daniel
627:essay
514:Vogue
377:Vogue
337:Focus
283:Focus
237:talk
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
697:talk
664:talk
635:talk
609:talk
584:talk
576:Keep
567:talk
547:talk
526:talk
482:Keep
473:talk
461:Keep
397:talk
387:and
373:Keep
354:Work
308:Work
247:Keep
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
633:🐉(
595:as
495:);
395:🐉(
232:DGG
221:TWL
158:– (
699:)
691:.
666:)
637:)
611:)
603:.
586:)
569:)
549:)
541:.
528:)
499:;
475:)
446:.
429:.
412:.
399:)
383:,
300:)
264:.
239:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
695:(
670:.
662:(
615:.
607:(
582:(
565:(
545:(
524:(
491:(
471:(
334:m
331:a
328:e
325:r
322:D
280:m
277:a
274:e
271:r
268:D
235:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.