240:. The one genuine RS in the article is a primary source interview with the festival's promoter, so not independent, and more importantly, nothing to do with the album itself. And although Prog Archives is a long-running website, it's a community blog and not an RS, with the review coming from a contributor.
481:
they are all blogs or community forums. I do sympathise with the difficulty in obtaining print media from before the internet age – it's the reason many album articles from the 80s and 90s are in poor shape compared with ones from the last few years, where there is a wealth of information online.
480:
The problem is that the sources you add to your articles about
Echolyn aren't reliable ones – Sonic Perspectives, Prog Archives and Dutch Progressive Rock Page may be long-established websites for fans of progressive rock music, but none of them pass Knowledge's requirements for reliable sources,
454:
I have updated the article with more sources and reviews and tailored the description to be more focussed on the album release and not the festival itself. Print reviews of the 25-year old niche (but important) music festival are tough to find. I'm not sure any of the progressive rock magazines
420:
Having few online reviews is not a problem if there are old magazine/newspaper reviews. If any of those exist they should be tracked down and named here. Also, this album can be listed in the bands' discographies as items in their histories, but that is not a reason for giving the album its own
368:- The article mentions the festival with little detail. It does not try to cover it. There are not many online reviews of this album as it came out in 1995. Several of the bands that performed at this particular event in 1994 are still active and it is part of their discographies.
205:
300:- The is an album article but it tries to cover the festival as well, which is already a mistake. (Though the festival was from pre-Internet times, I did manage to find this article from the period:
550:. IMO, the annual event itself is more notable than the compilation album. Sources about the compilation album are scarce, but the sources in the article are indeed reliable. I found a
257:
630:
And that being said, there's long been a notion held by some that if there's some excuse for there not to be reliable sources on a subject (pre-Internet age, say), the provisions of
609:"The sources in the article are reliable" -- seriously?? The first one is a primary source. The second is a track listing, and I am curious upon what basis "sobaworld.co.kr" meets
199:
158:
307:
and the album has even less media coverage that the event that it came from, only being found at various list sites like ProgArchives, and the usual retail/streaming sites. ---
347:
article is already included in the external links of the article, and is the primary source interview with the festival director that I mentioned in the nomination.
303:, and a few Google Books results in which it appears briefly in various lists of 90's events.) Since we are discussing an apparent album article here, we must use
277:
105:
90:
131:
126:
165:
135:
118:
220:
444:
322:
187:
572:
536:
249:
85:
78:
17:
470:
405:
383:
181:
588:
That's the personal blog of a user hosted on the
University of Sussex's website, that's not an RS in any shape or form.
57:
177:
662:
644:
597:
579:
531:
490:
474:
449:
387:
356:
327:
289:
269:
99:
95:
60:
503:
227:
679:
40:
122:
440:
318:
53:
114:
66:
554:, which has a segment which briefly talks about the album. That said, the article is good enough to pass
301:
675:
593:
486:
352:
285:
265:
245:
193:
36:
635:
568:
458:
371:
634:
and the GNG are waived. This curious notion is not supported by any
Knowledge policy or guideline.
547:
462:
397:
375:
213:
658:
466:
431:
401:
379:
338:
309:
514:
Re-listed to allow time to locate possible or likely sources, but otherwise consensus is delete.
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
674:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
551:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
622:
589:
555:
482:
422:
348:
304:
281:
261:
241:
237:
560:
527:
621:
piece listed as an external link in the article. Claiming that these sources provide the
613:. The third is six sentences long (and I am curious upon what basis "expose.org" meets
654:
409:
614:
610:
426:
152:
631:
518:
653:
I am yet to see coverage from reliable source independent of the subject.
628:
that the GNG requires is, at best, fishing. Fails the GNG and WP:ALBUM.
617:). The fourth does not mention the subject at all. Neither does the
670:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
506:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
408:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
148:
144:
140:
212:
258:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
455:existed at that time (Expose', Progression, etc.).
517:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
682:). No further edits should be made to this page.
276:Note: This discussion has been included in the
256:Note: This discussion has been included in the
226:
8:
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
456:
369:
278:list of Music-related deletion discussions
275:
255:
7:
24:
91:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
663:08:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
645:01:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
61:14:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
699:
598:14:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
580:07:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
537:18:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
491:14:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
475:14:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
450:14:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
388:13:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
357:19:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
328:19:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
290:15:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
270:15:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
250:15:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
672:Please do not modify it.
65:
32:Please do not modify it.
394:Note to closing admin
79:Articles for deletion
623:significant coverage
115:Progfest '94 (album)
67:Progfest '94 (album)
512:Relisting comment:
619:Los Angeles Times
539:
477:
461:comment added by
435:
413:
390:
374:comment added by
313:
292:
272:
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
690:
641:
578:
576:
563:
523:
516:
509:
507:
448:
433:
391:
342:
326:
311:
231:
230:
216:
168:
156:
138:
76:
34:
698:
697:
693:
692:
691:
689:
688:
687:
686:
680:deletion review
637:
577:
566:
561:
559:
540:
535:
519:
502:
500:
430:
336:
308:
173:
164:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
696:
694:
685:
684:
666:
665:
648:
626:to the subject
603:
602:
601:
600:
583:
582:
565:
525:
515:
510:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
452:
415:
414:
362:
361:
360:
359:
331:
330:
294:
293:
273:
234:
233:
170:
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
695:
683:
681:
677:
673:
668:
667:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
647:
646:
643:
642:
640:
633:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
604:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:
585:
584:
581:
574:
570:
564:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
538:
533:
529:
524:
522:
513:
508:
505:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
453:
451:
446:
442:
438:
437:
428:
424:
421:article. See
419:
418:
417:
416:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
367:
366:Do Not Delete
364:
363:
358:
354:
350:
346:
340:
339:Doomsdayer520
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
324:
320:
316:
315:
306:
302:
299:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:Find sources:
171:
167:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
671:
669:
650:
638:
636:
629:
625:
618:
606:
543:
520:
511:
501:
457:— Preceding
432:
393:
370:— Preceding
365:
344:
310:
297:
235:
223:
217:
209:
202:
196:
190:
184:
174:
161:
72:
49:
47:
31:
28:
639:Ravenswing
590:Richard3120
532:revolutions
483:Richard3120
349:Richard3120
282:Richard3120
262:Richard3120
242:Richard3120
200:free images
434:DOOMSDAYER
312:DOOMSDAYER
676:talk page
556:WP:NALBUM
423:WP:NALBUM
305:WP:NALBUM
238:WP:NALBUM
37:talk page
678:or in a
655:Orientls
573:ICE CUBE
548:Chutch15
504:Relisted
471:contribs
463:Chutch15
459:unsigned
445:Contribs
406:contribs
398:Chutch15
384:contribs
376:Chutch15
372:unsigned
345:LA Times
323:Contribs
159:View log
100:glossary
39:or in a
607:Delete:
562:ASTIG😎
528:spin me
206:WP refs
194:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
651:Delete
552:source
546:: Per
298:Delete
236:Fails
178:Google
136:delete
58:(talk)
50:delete
615:WP:RS
611:WP:RS
569:ICE T
521:78.26
429:. ---
427:WP:RS
221:JSTOR
182:books
166:Stats
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
659:talk
632:WP:V
594:talk
544:Keep
487:talk
467:talk
441:Talk
425:and
402:talk
380:talk
353:talk
343:the
319:Talk
286:talk
266:talk
246:talk
214:FENS
188:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
436:520
410:AfD
314:520
228:TWL
157:– (
54:PMC
52:. ♠
661:)
596:)
571:•
558:.
530:/
489:)
473:)
469:•
412:.
404:•
396::
392:—
386:)
382:•
355:)
288:)
280:.
268:)
260:.
248:)
208:)
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
56:♠
657:(
592:(
575:)
567:(
534:)
526:(
485:(
465:(
447:)
443:|
439:(
400:(
378:(
351:(
341::
337:@
325:)
321:|
317:(
284:(
264:(
244:(
232:)
224:·
218:·
210:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
180:(
172:(
169:)
162:·
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.