Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Prose interpretation - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

323:, where it was said to be probably a spinout from our NFL article (along with other articles) ie it was originally about NFL etc contests. But it has been altered and expanded over time. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, this page is an essay. Since our sister project Wikiversity includes essays, we could transwiki this article there. Other options include stubification or some other form of rewrite, disambiguation (since this is an ambiguous expression), or redirection to oral interpretation. A further option to consider is a selective merge to National Forensics League (with a certain amount of rewriting). It was however said at the previous AfD that the NFL contests were independently notable with a considerable body of sources offered in support of that. I have no idea what the best course of action is here. The overall impression that I have is of a gigantic train wreck. 319:"rules" given might have been from one or more particular undisclosed contest or contests. The oldest revisions of this very old article (circa 2005 and 2006) contain references to the National Forensics League, and to rules imposed by "states" (are there state forensic leagues? I don't know). This article has a previous AfD nomination at 310:. The expression "prose interpretation" can refer to prose interpretation of poetry (ie rewriting poetry as prose). So the present page name is ambiguous, and "oral interpretation of prose" would be better for the broader topic (whereas specific contests do use "prose interpretation" as their name). There is a book called 318:
which covers the oral interpretation of both prose and poetry, though the level of coverage indicates that the oral interpretation of prose (in a broad sense) is notable in its own right. That however does not deal with "essay". I don't know if this is an essay. For all I know all or some of the
207: 320: 272: 201: 160: 255: 92: 107: 167: 133: 128: 137: 120: 87: 80: 17: 222: 189: 60: 308: 101: 97: 306: 408: 341: 463: 352:
Given that several considerations were mooted above, a relisting for further thoughts and participants seems beneficial
40: 183: 446: 423: 399: 380: 364: 332: 314:
but I'm not sure exactly what type of prose interpretation it is about. We need to find out. We have an article on
281: 264: 247: 62: 179: 124: 229: 459: 419: 360: 277: 260: 36: 376: 293:, specifically the reading (oral interpretation) of prose. There are sources for that topic, such as 243: 116: 68: 58: 434: 315: 215: 195: 442: 328: 76: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
356: 372: 301:. There is probably a broader topic of non-competitive interpretation. See the chapter in 239: 53: 438: 395: 324: 311: 302: 298: 294: 154: 390: 388:
but consider for dividing between the geneal susbject and the contest.
305:
which doesn't seem to have much to say about contests. And see also
433:
per DGG. After consideration, I think the best course of action is
454:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
371:
It is to be kept it needs sources, and it needs to be renamed.
411:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
344:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
321:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Public forum debate
299:
Oral Interpretation of Prose in Interscholastic Contests
150: 146: 142: 214: 289:
This article is presently about prose interpretation
417:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 355:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 228: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 466:). No further edits should be made to this page. 271:Note: This discussion has been included in the 254:Note: This discussion has been included in the 273:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 8: 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 256:list of Events-related deletion discussions 270: 253: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 93:Introduction to deletion process 1: 312:Advanced Prose Interpretation 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 483: 447:19:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 63:12:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC) 424:00:18, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 400:18:11, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 381:14:26, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 365:12:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 333:19:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC) 282:14:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 265:14:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 248:09:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 456:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 81:Articles for deletion 117:Prose interpretation 69:Prose interpretation 316:Oral interpretation 238:Unreferenced essay 350:Relisting comment: 426: 367: 284: 267: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 474: 431:Keep and improve 422: 416: 414: 412: 354: 347: 345: 280: 263: 233: 232: 218: 170: 158: 140: 78: 34: 482: 481: 477: 476: 475: 473: 472: 471: 470: 464:deletion review 427: 418: 407: 405: 368: 340: 338: 276: 259: 175: 166: 131: 115: 112: 75: 72: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 480: 478: 469: 468: 450: 449: 415: 404: 403: 402: 383: 353: 348: 337: 336: 335: 286: 285: 268: 236: 235: 172: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 479: 467: 465: 461: 457: 452: 451: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 429: 428: 425: 421: 420:North America 413: 410: 401: 397: 393: 392: 387: 384: 382: 378: 374: 370: 369: 366: 362: 358: 351: 346: 343: 334: 330: 326: 322: 317: 313: 309: 307: 304: 300: 297:and the book 296: 292: 288: 287: 283: 279: 278:North America 274: 269: 266: 262: 261:North America 257: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 173: 169: 165: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 59: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 455: 453: 430: 406: 389: 385: 349: 339: 290: 237: 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 163: 74: 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 357:Nosebagbear 202:free images 435:WP:SOFIXIT 373:Rathfelder 240:Rathfelder 55:Ritchie333 460:talk page 37:talk page 462:or in a 439:James500 409:Relisted 342:Relisted 325:James500 291:contests 161:View log 102:glossary 39:or in a 208:WP refs 196:scholar 134:protect 129:history 79:New to 180:Google 138:delete 396:talk 386:Keep. 223:JSTOR 184:books 168:Stats 155:views 147:watch 143:links 16:< 443:talk 377:talk 361:talk 329:talk 303:this 295:this 244:talk 216:FENS 190:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 50:keep 391:DGG 230:TWL 159:– ( 445:) 437:. 398:) 379:) 363:) 331:) 275:. 258:. 246:) 210:) 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 52:. 441:( 394:( 375:( 359:( 327:( 242:( 234:) 226:· 220:· 212:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 182:( 174:( 171:) 164:· 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ritchie333


12:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Prose interpretation

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Prose interpretation
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.