Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Proud Pour (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

265:
Proud Pour should be deleted because it is basically an advertisement, may not meet notability guidelines, an orphan, and the contributor has a close connection with the subject. These all point to the fact that it should be deleted.--Globg 13:57, 13 October 2020
228: 95: 284: 189: 304: 222: 136: 121: 89: 345: 359:
The first sentence sounds like an advertisement, non notable sources used. No major awards won by the business for their product etc...
402:
Knowledge is not a platform for promotion, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG/NCORP.
331:. None of the current sources are acceptable for purposes of showing notability, and the only halfway-decent ref I could find was 116: 109: 17: 162: 157: 66: 408: 394: 351: 316: 296: 276: 72: 166: 243: 339: 210: 149: 130: 126: 425: 47: 335: 204: 374: 23: 421: 43: 200: 153: 364: 312: 292: 272: 236: 250: 145: 78: 105: 36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
390: 382: 332: 328: 216: 360: 308: 288: 268: 403: 60: 378: 183: 386: 260: 377:
from a worthy project which the company supports, and I am not seeing
416:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
179: 175: 171: 235: 373:: An article about a branded product. Notability is 285:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
96:Articles for deletion/Proud Pour (2nd nomination) 50:). No further edits should be made to this page. 428:). No further edits should be made to this page. 303:Note: This discussion has been included in the 283:Note: This discussion has been included in the 305:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 249: 8: 137:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 302: 282: 24:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Proud Pour 259:Procedural nomination after attempt by 86: 264: 7: 85: 31: 122:Introduction to deletion process 90:Articles for deletion/Proud Pour 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 409:18:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC) 395:08:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) 352:04:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 334:, which is not good enough. 317:02:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 297:02:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 277:02:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC) 73:11:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 385:for the firm/brand itself. 112:(AfD)? Read these primers! 445: 418:Please do not modify it. 39:Please do not modify it. 84:AfDs for this article: 110:Articles for deletion 336:AleatoryPonderings 319: 299: 127:Guide to deletion 117:How to contribute 71: 22:(Redirected from 436: 254: 253: 239: 187: 169: 107: 63: 41: 27: 444: 443: 439: 438: 437: 435: 434: 433: 432: 426:deletion review 375:WP:NOTINHERITED 196: 160: 144: 141: 104: 101: 92: 82: 69: 55:The result was 48:deletion review 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 442: 440: 431: 430: 412: 411: 397: 368: 354: 321: 320: 300: 257: 256: 193: 140: 139: 134: 124: 119: 102: 100: 99: 98: 93: 88: 83: 81: 76: 65: 53: 52: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 441: 429: 427: 423: 419: 414: 413: 410: 407: 406: 401: 398: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 366: 362: 358: 355: 353: 349: 348: 343: 342: 337: 333: 330: 326: 323: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 267: 262: 252: 248: 245: 242: 238: 234: 230: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 202: 199: 198:Find sources: 194: 191: 185: 181: 177: 173: 168: 164: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142: 138: 135: 132: 128: 125: 123: 120: 118: 115: 114: 113: 111: 106: 97: 94: 91: 87: 80: 77: 75: 74: 70: 68: 62: 58: 51: 49: 45: 40: 34: 33: 25: 19: 417: 415: 404: 399: 381:of attained 370: 356: 346: 340: 324: 263:a week ago. 258: 246: 240: 232: 225: 219: 213: 207: 197: 103: 64: 56: 54: 38: 35: 223:free images 383:notability 146:Proud Pour 79:Proud Pour 422:talk page 361:Oaktree b 309:Shellwood 289:Shellwood 269:Barkeep49 44:talk page 424:or in a 405:HighKing 379:evidence 329:WP:NCORP 327:. Fails 190:View log 131:glossary 61:Eddie891 46:or in a 229:WP refs 217:scholar 163:protect 158:history 108:New to 400:Delete 371:Delete 357:Delete 325:Delete 201:Google 167:delete 57:delete 387:AllyD 266:(UTC) 261:Globg 244:JSTOR 205:books 184:views 176:watch 172:links 16:< 391:talk 365:talk 313:talk 293:talk 273:talk 237:FENS 211:news 180:logs 154:talk 150:edit 67:Work 347:!!! 344:) ( 341:??? 251:TWL 188:– ( 393:) 350:) 315:) 307:. 295:) 287:. 275:) 231:) 182:| 178:| 174:| 170:| 165:| 161:| 156:| 152:| 59:. 389:( 367:) 363:( 338:( 311:( 291:( 271:( 255:) 247:· 241:· 233:· 226:· 220:· 214:· 208:· 203:( 195:( 192:) 186:) 148:( 133:) 129:( 26:)

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Proud Pour
talk page
deletion review
Eddie891
Work
11:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Proud Pour
Articles for deletion/Proud Pour
Articles for deletion/Proud Pour (2nd nomination)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Proud Pour
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.