Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Psepholograph - Knowledge

Source 📝

240:. Contrary to the author's claims presented without evidence on the article's talk page, the word is not widely used. Googling it reveals only clones of the article. Google Scholar and Google Books return Balogh's book (with no articles citing it) and an unrelated exam prep book in which the word appears as an incorrect answer to a multiple-choice question. There is also a post from a confused Redditor who came across the Wiki article but couldn't find any other info. The seven citations in the article are not helpful. Three are broken links, even the auto-generated Wayback archives, meaning the links were presumably broken back when they were archived almost a decade ago. Two are links to Balogh's profiles on websites of organisations he has worked for, neither of which mentions the psepholograph. Two are external pages that also do not mention it. The last one is a link to a short record of Balogh's book, with no information, just the title and keywords, on scientificcommons.org, a website that no longer exists. Also, there is little use in an article about a type of data visualisation if it includes neither a picture of the visualisation nor a description of how it looks. 360:
interested in psephology, visualisation and related concepts. The Reddit question indicates that the article's very existence is a problem—the suggestions of its widespread use is confusing and even misleading for readers who then find no details or examples of the concept on Knowledge, Google or
355:
in any sense, be that use by psephologists or media publication to the public—in fact, while the article is scant on any technical detail or illustration whatsoever, that seems to be the case for the broader internet, where I can find not one illustration or example of a psepholograph outside of
361:
anywhere. As the nominator has outlined, the references seem reasonably numerous, but upon deeper inspection merely verify Balogh's employers and authorship of the thesis, with the last three actually referring to Mackerras's pendulum, not the psepholograph. --
205: 268: 158: 199: 294: 319: 105: 90: 403:
all refereces are now archived, points to topics being not relevant. Also most page contributions are not independant, coming from thesis author.
351:
from a 1993 Master's thesis. I can't find any evidence for the author's claims that this is an "accepted term" or that it has succeeded the
165: 131: 126: 135: 85: 78: 17: 118: 220: 187: 99: 95: 446: 40: 181: 429: 412: 395: 370: 336: 311: 284: 249: 177: 60: 442: 122: 36: 276: 260: 227: 245: 425: 408: 213: 114: 66: 352: 331: 306: 264: 391: 74: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
383: 366: 236:
This article was written by Matt Balogh, who invented the "psepholograph" in his 1993 book,
193: 272: 421: 404: 54: 326: 301: 387: 348: 152: 379: 362: 241: 238:
Quantitative political analysis in Australia: introducing the psepholograph
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
148: 144: 140: 212: 269:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 August 18 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 449:). No further edits should be made to this page. 318:Note: This discussion has been included in the 293:Note: This discussion has been included in the 295:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 320:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 226: 8: 106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 317: 292: 356:Balogh's thesis, and believe me, I am 7: 24: 91:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 267:). I have transcluded it to 430:09:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC) 413:22:59, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 396:20:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 371:09:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 337:07:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 312:07:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 285:05:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 259:This AfD was not correctly 250:05:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 81:(AfD)? Read these primers! 61:05:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 466: 439:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 347:This looks like pure 79:Articles for deletion 353:Mackerras pendulum 257:Automated comment: 349:original research 339: 314: 287: 283: 96:Guide to deletion 86:How to contribute 457: 334: 329: 325: 309: 304: 300: 279: 278:Talk to my owner 274: 255: 231: 230: 216: 168: 156: 138: 76: 59: 57: 34: 465: 464: 460: 459: 458: 456: 455: 454: 453: 447:deletion review 332: 327: 323: 307: 302: 298: 282: 277: 173: 164: 129: 113: 110: 73: 70: 55: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 463: 461: 452: 451: 433: 432: 415: 398: 373: 341: 340: 315: 289: 288: 275: 234: 233: 170: 109: 108: 103: 93: 88: 71: 69: 64: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 462: 450: 448: 444: 440: 435: 434: 431: 427: 423: 419: 416: 414: 410: 406: 402: 399: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 374: 372: 368: 364: 359: 354: 350: 346: 343: 342: 338: 335: 330: 321: 316: 313: 310: 305: 296: 291: 290: 286: 280: 273: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 253: 252: 251: 247: 243: 239: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175:Find sources: 171: 167: 163: 160: 154: 150: 146: 142: 137: 133: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115:Psepholograph 112: 111: 107: 104: 101: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 83: 82: 80: 75: 68: 67:Psepholograph 65: 63: 62: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 438: 436: 420:per Canley. 417: 400: 375: 357: 344: 263:to the log ( 256: 237: 235: 223: 217: 209: 202: 196: 190: 184: 174: 161: 72: 49: 47: 31: 28: 261:transcluded 200:free images 443:talk page 422:Bookscale 405:Teraplane 37:talk page 445:or in a 328:OxonAlex 303:OxonAlex 159:View log 100:glossary 39:or in a 388:SalmanZ 281::Online 206:WP refs 194:scholar 132:protect 127:history 77:New to 418:Delete 401:Delete 380:Canley 376:Delete 363:Canley 345:Delete 333:- talk 308:- talk 265:step 3 178:Google 136:delete 50:delete 221:JSTOR 182:books 166:Stats 153:views 145:watch 141:links 16:< 426:talk 409:talk 392:talk 386:) -- 384:talk 378:Per 367:talk 358:very 271:. — 246:talk 242:1o8x 214:FENS 188:news 149:logs 123:talk 119:edit 56:czar 324:~~ 299:~~ 228:TWL 157:– ( 428:) 411:) 394:) 369:) 322:. 297:. 248:) 208:) 151:| 147:| 143:| 139:| 134:| 130:| 125:| 121:| 52:. 424:( 407:( 390:( 382:( 365:( 244:( 232:) 224:· 218:· 210:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 180:( 172:( 169:) 162:· 155:) 117:( 102:) 98:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
czar
05:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Psepholograph

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Psepholograph
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.