258:
From what I can tell, and I am currently researfching PIT, writing a book on it and looking at it from the POV of the SciPol
Wikiedia project, there are a couple of books on it, an NGO network and a university network supoorting it, with lots of webpages covering it, and that's it, as it only started
405:. I don't think the article is promotional but haven't checked it thoroughly. It probably needs expansion as well as some restructuring, e.g. structuring by field of technology (e.g. Software, etc). Note that many sources use this terminology, however many about relevant topics use phrasing like
211:
278:
This seems to allude to the fact that the public interest main article needs work and expansion, not that this article shoulde be deleted. There are several topics not covered on public interest other than the technology
263:
main article is crappy. My gut instinct based on that is to add a decent summary of PIT to the public interest main article and then delete the PIT article. Still, I'd like to think about it for a while.
302:
205:
168:
141:
136:
145:
100:
128:
115:
282:
As for the field being new, the growing work around it, specifically in the academic work, might be reason enough for it to continue growing on its own.
226:
193:
95:
88:
17:
132:
66:
187:
109:
105:
428:
345:
313:
291:
273:
252:
70:
325:
424:
373:
447:
183:
40:
172:
124:
76:
233:
52:. Consensus indicates that the current state of the article is not egregious enough to bring out the explosives.
409:
despite also being related. It would be good to transclude a brief summary with a wikilink to the article at
420:
443:
358:- Variety of sources in the article are reliable and dedicated to the subject - so this is definitely a
287:
269:
199:
36:
247:
219:
62:
306:
84:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
442:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
367:
283:
265:
401:
is not even mentioned or in the refs, he does a lot in this area using this term, e.g. see
394:
243:
410:
363:
260:
390:
402:
242:
WP:TNT might be warranted for this promotional article, or perhaps draftification is an
398:
58:
162:
366:
has a short summary and links here - which should be perfectly fine. Also -
336:
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
328:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
397:
albeit the article seems to need an overhaul. For example,
413:
but merging this article to there would be too detailed.
158:
154:
150:
218:
407:
public interest alternatives for important AI tools
334:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
232:
303:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
450:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
116:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
300:
259:in 2020. What does not help is that the
406:
370:has done some cleanup since the nom.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
101:Introduction to deletion process
1:
91:(AfD)? Read these primers!
467:
125:Public interest technology
77:Public interest technology
362:. As an umbrella article
440:Please do not modify it.
429:09:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
346:06:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
314:13:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
292:19:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
274:08:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
253:05:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
71:13:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
383:20:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC
173:edits since nomination
89:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
421:Prototyperspective
348:
316:
106:Guide to deletion
96:How to contribute
57:
458:
344:
333:
331:
329:
311:
237:
236:
222:
166:
148:
86:
53:
34:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:deletion review
411:Public Interest
378:
364:public Interest
335:
324:
322:
307:
261:public Interest
249:MrsSnoozyTurtle
179:
139:
123:
120:
83:
80:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
453:
452:
434:
433:
432:
431:
415:
414:
399:Bruce Schneier
384:
376:
351:
350:
332:
318:
317:
297:
296:
295:
294:
280:
240:
239:
176:
119:
118:
113:
103:
98:
81:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
451:
449:
445:
441:
436:
435:
430:
426:
422:
419:
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
382:
381:
379:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
349:
347:
343:
341:
340:
330:
327:
320:
319:
315:
312:
310:
304:
299:
298:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
250:
245:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
174:
170:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
143:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
117:
114:
111:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
93:
92:
90:
85:
78:
75:
73:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
439:
437:
386:
375:
371:
359:
355:
338:
337:
323:
321:
309:CAPTAIN RAJU
308:
248:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
82:
49:
47:
31:
28:
368:Johncdraper
354:Leaning to
284:Darrowlykos
266:Johncdraper
206:free images
444:talk page
59:Alpha3031
37:talk page
446:or in a
372:Resonant
326:Relisted
169:View log
110:glossary
39:or in a
279:aspect.
212:WP refs
200:scholar
142:protect
137:history
87:New to
395:WP:GNG
246:here?
244:WP:ATD
184:Google
146:delete
391:WP:RS
360:thing
227:JSTOR
188:books
163:views
155:watch
151:links
16:<
425:talk
403:here
393:and
389:per
387:Keep
380:tion
356:keep
288:talk
270:talk
220:FENS
194:news
159:logs
133:talk
129:edit
50:keep
377:tor
374:Dis
234:TWL
167:– (
427:)
342:iz
305:.
290:)
272:)
214:)
171:|
161:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
69:)
65:•
423:(
339:L
286:(
268:(
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
165:)
127:(
112:)
108:(
67:c
63:t
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.