236:. Some of these are a bit trivial, but a couple of them are quite in-depth, and there also appears to have been a Tom's Hardware review as well, although I couldn't find this. The article needs a major re-write and expanding, but that's not an AfD issue.
165:
118:
315:
516:
Sorry if I misled anyone, what I'm getting at is that routine reviews of a product do not make it notable, the product needs to be special for some reason. Similar to
159:
538:
is relevant: it explains that it's possible to have a good article for run-of-the-mill products as long as you have detailed reviews rather than bare statistics. --
196:
Non-notable product. Article mainly consists of specifications. Contested PROD by DGG who suggests a merge. Another editor had endorsed the PROD. --
125:
589:. Product reviews don't prove notability. It needs to have an impact or technical legacy. Just another product, here today, gone tomorrow.
299:
For a product to be notable imo it has to have had extensive coverage or made a real cultural impact. These headphones have done neither.
535:
267:
205:
552:
Thanks for the links. Apparently there's no cut-and-dried policy. I personally think it best to err on the side of inclusion. -—
17:
499:
Just added a second review source to article. We now have significant coverage in multiple sources. Please post a link to the
231:
91:
86:
442:
95:
180:
147:
478:
There's no requirement that the product have an impact, only that it have substantial coverage in reliable sources. --
78:
623:
254:
Being mentioned somewhere on the internet is not a reason to have an article. It is just one of 100s of 1000s of
40:
577:
543:
483:
303:
263:
201:
141:
619:
281:
241:
218:- I've found plenty of references on this product, in addition to the CNET review cited in the article:
36:
137:
604:
581:
556:
547:
529:
507:
487:
469:
448:
403:
375:
352:
327:
306:
285:
271:
245:
209:
60:
525:
465:
277:
237:
219:
173:
187:
573:
539:
479:
300:
259:
197:
434:
323:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
618:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
572:
I started a "critical reception" section. Lots of reviews; meets notability requirements. --
517:
415:
385:
338:
349:
82:
225:
153:
600:
553:
521:
504:
461:
255:
228:
590:
371:
222:
426:
397:
319:
54:
112:
520:(I realise this is for events, but I believe it is appropriate to apply here).
74:
66:
418:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
388:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
341:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
234:
594:
366:
612:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
276:
There are enough proper reviews on there for GNG to be met.
108:
104:
100:
172:
425:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
395:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
348:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
626:). No further edits should be made to this page.
364:Some of the reviews are apparently substantial.
221:(couldn't check this one, damn school filters),
316:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
186:
8:
503:policy. This is first I've heard of this. -—
314:Note: This debate has been included in the
313:
460:No evidence of the product's impact.
7:
536:Knowledge:Every snowflake is unique
24:
591:WP is not for product listings.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
404:21:18, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
376:01:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
353:01:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
328:16:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
307:01:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
286:21:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
272:19:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
246:09:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
210:03:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
605:03:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
61:23:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
582:10:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
557:19:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
548:10:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
530:07:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
508:04:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
488:15:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
470:10:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
449:10:19, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
643:
615:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
258:products out there. --
48:The result was
451:
406:
355:
330:
634:
617:
445:
439:
431:
424:
420:
400:
394:
390:
347:
343:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
642:
641:
637:
636:
635:
633:
632:
631:
630:
624:deletion review
613:
603:
443:
435:
427:
413:
398:
383:
336:
256:run of the mill
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
640:
638:
629:
628:
608:
607:
599:
584:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
511:
510:
493:
492:
491:
490:
473:
472:
454:
453:
452:
422:
421:
410:
409:
408:
407:
392:
391:
380:
379:
378:
358:
357:
356:
345:
344:
333:
332:
331:
310:
309:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
249:
248:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
639:
627:
625:
621:
616:
610:
609:
606:
602:
598:
597:
592:
588:
585:
583:
579:
575:
574:Colapeninsula
571:
568:
567:
558:
555:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
540:Colapeninsula
537:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
506:
502:
498:
495:
494:
489:
485:
481:
480:Colapeninsula
477:
476:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
450:
446:
440:
438:
432:
430:
423:
419:
417:
412:
411:
405:
402:
401:
393:
389:
387:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
363:
360:
359:
354:
351:
346:
342:
340:
335:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
311:
308:
305:
302:
298:
295:
294:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:Alan Liefting
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:Alan Liefting
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
614:
611:
595:
586:
569:
500:
496:
457:
436:
428:
414:
396:
384:
365:
361:
337:
296:
215:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
534:The essay
350:Courcelles
75:Pulsar 590
67:Pulsar 590
620:talk page
522:1292simon
518:WP:EFFECT
462:1292simon
37:talk page
622:or in a
416:Relisted
386:Relisted
339:Relisted
278:Lukeno94
268:contribs
238:Lukeno94
206:contribs
119:View log
39:or in a
596:P 1 9 9
458:Delete.
429:Mediran
399:MBisanz
320:Frankie
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
587:Delete
501:impact
304:regard
301:Rotten
297:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
372:talk
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
578:talk
570:Keep
554:Kvng
544:talk
526:talk
505:Kvng
497:Keep
484:talk
466:talk
362:Keep
324:talk
318:. —
282:talk
264:talk
242:talk
216:Keep
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
593:--
367:DGG
188:TWL
117:– (
580:)
546:)
528:)
486:)
468:)
447:)
441:•
374:)
326:)
284:)
270:)
266:-
244:)
233:,
230:,
227:,
224:,
208:)
204:-
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:.
601:✉
576:(
542:(
524:(
482:(
464:(
444:c
437:t
433:(
370:(
322:(
280:(
262:(
240:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.