366:
hereinafter referred to as the Rules have been made by the
Government of the Punjab, Pakistan in 2002, for protection of juveniles in conflict with the law. The article does not include the original text or any copyrighted material of these Rules that may make this article a candidate for deletion.
429:
The points that IP raises above would be sufficient to improve the article, if and only if that information came strictly from reliable sources. My worry, though, is that IP's point is that xe could make this analysis themselves, which would constitute original research. The very last phrase
411:
Copyright is not the issue. (Indeed, it's highly doubtful that governmental works are considered copyrighted in general.) The issue here is that this is the wrong scope for an encyclopedia; this is not the place for what would essentially become a legal treatise.
154:
430:("expanded in a scholarly manner") directly implies original research on the part of xyrself or other editors. If the article is deleted (as I think it should be unless more sources are provided to show that this law is
88:
83:
148:
92:
75:
434:), I would be willing to take a userfied version of this temporarily and work with the IP editor to determine if the article could be expanded into a full article meeting our policies.
115:
250:
276:
451:
I just realized that I wasn't clear in my point above that if the article is not improved to demonstrate notability (and it does so in a manner consistent with
223:, but I don't think it's original research in either a Knowledge (XXG) sense or a commonly-understood sense. If it's governmental regulations, it's inherently
302:
169:
383:
Have these Rules proved to be helpful to convince the law enforcers to go for
Restorative Justice instead of Retributive Justice in case of Juveniles?
136:
517:
489:
464:
443:
421:
402:
357:
335:
317:
291:
265:
240:
213:
57:
394:
130:
126:
17:
185:
I don't believe a set of rules in regards to the
Justice System are inherintly "Notable". No sources, references, and contains only
79:
176:
363:
71:
63:
532:
142:
36:
496:
Because there are probably thousands of such rules. Otherwise, every single law passed in any large country would be
371:
What change these Rules have brought about regarding treatment of juvenile delinquents as compared with the adults?
531:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
398:
48:. If anyone wants this userfied to re-work into an more appropriate article ask me and I'll provide a copy.
377:
What are the international instruments involved e.g. United
Nations' conventions on the juvenile justice?
485:
53:
393:
For the above reasons, this article shall not be deleted and indeed expanded in scholarly manner.--
162:
227:
original research. But I agree with the notability arguments. In addition, this is analogous to
513:
460:
439:
504:--you'll see that the main requirement is that there must be multiple instances of coverage in
313:
287:
261:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
477:
380:
Comparision of these Rules with similar statutes of other developing and developed countries?
481:
473:
331:
501:
228:
210:
49:
505:
452:
345:
186:
497:
431:
509:
472:
Why an article on
Juvenile Justice System Rules prevelant in the largest province of
456:
435:
417:
353:
236:
309:
283:
257:
109:
327:
367:
The article can be expanded by including (e.g.) material about the following:
191:
476:
having population of more than 90 million people including juveniles is not
455:) then it should be deleted and worked on in userspace or the Incubator.
413:
349:
232:
326:- What this article needs is an expansion and re-write not deletion.--
525:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
535:). No further edits should be made to this page.
251:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
8:
297:
277:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
271:
245:
374:What are the shortcomings of these Rules?
364:Punjab Juvenile Justice System Rules 2002
72:Punjab Juvenile Justice System Rules 2002
64:Punjab Juvenile Justice System Rules 2002
303:list of Law-related deletion discussions
301:: This debate has been included in the
275:: This debate has been included in the
249:: This debate has been included in the
229:Knowledge (XXG)'s not being a dictionary
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
344:-- notability not demonstrated in a
24:
1:
502:general notability guidelines
518:06:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
490:06:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
465:23:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
444:23:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
422:16:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
403:16:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
358:03:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
336:19:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
318:19:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
292:19:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
266:19:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
241:10:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
214:10:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
58:02:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
508:to demonstrate notability.
552:
346:reliable secondary source
528:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
500:. Take a look at the
386:Implementation issues?
44:The result was
320:
306:
294:
280:
268:
254:
187:Original research
543:
530:
506:reliable sources
307:
281:
255:
212:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
551:
550:
546:
545:
544:
542:
541:
540:
539:
533:deletion review
526:
470:Keep and expand
324:Keep and expand
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
549:
547:
538:
537:
521:
520:
493:
492:
467:
446:
424:
395:182.177.145.81
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
375:
372:
361:
360:
339:
338:
321:
295:
269:
243:
216:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
548:
536:
534:
529:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
428:
425:
423:
419:
415:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
373:
370:
369:
368:
365:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
319:
315:
311:
304:
300:
296:
293:
289:
285:
278:
274:
270:
267:
263:
259:
252:
248:
244:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
215:
211:
209:
208:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
527:
524:
469:
448:
426:
408:
392:
362:
341:
323:
298:
272:
246:
224:
220:
192:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
482:Tariq babur
389:Etc., etc.,
149:free images
50:Beeblebrox
310:• Gene93k
284:• Gene93k
258:• Gene93k
510:Qwyrxian
457:Qwyrxian
436:Qwyrxian
116:View log
498:Notable
478:Notable
432:notable
427:Comment
409:Comment
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
474:Punjab
449:Delete
342:Delete
328:BabbaQ
221:Delete
127:Google
93:delete
46:delete
453:WP:OR
231:. --
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
514:talk
486:talk
461:talk
440:talk
418:talk
399:talk
354:talk
332:talk
314:talk
299:Note
288:talk
273:Note
262:talk
247:Note
237:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
480:?--
414:Nlu
350:N2e
308:--
282:--
256:--
233:Nlu
225:not
177:TWL
114:– (
516:)
488:)
463:)
442:)
420:)
412:--
401:)
356:)
348:.
334:)
316:)
305:.
290:)
279:.
264:)
253:.
239:)
189:.
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
512:(
484:(
459:(
438:(
416:(
397:(
352:(
330:(
312:(
286:(
260:(
235:(
206:i
203:t
200:s
197:u
194:D
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.