402:(pp. 190, 253) has a stemma of the children of Q. Metellus Creticus which includes 2 sons -- a Quintus & a Marcus -- which he indicates are hypothetical. (He doesn't provide any information why he thinks these 2 men existed.) Here claim 2 is confirmed; could he be the subject of this article? Maybe. But the rule about notability comes into play, since at most what we can say is that he existed, & notability is not inherited.
415:(A warning: yes, the two secondary sources I cited are over thirty years old. But the material they discussed hasn't changed in that time; what I am doing here is relying on their expert experience. And Syme is widely considered a far more intelligent scholar of ancient Rome than most who have come after him. His opinions cannot be discarded simply because he lived so long ago.)
387:
iv.42.173) tells of a
Caecilius Metellus who fought under Octavian/Augustus at Actium, who successfully pleaded for the life of his father, who had fought on the other side. However, there are no further solid facts about either person, such as their complete names. This hasn't stopped experts from
391:
This period is full of inferences & speculation. Often one secondary source will state A is the son (or brother, or otherwise a relation) of B, but further research will show that this relationship is inferred from something admittedly shaky such as similar names -- or even simple hand-waving.
424:
Maybe the content of this article is invented out of thin air, or maybe it confuses details from two or more people. At this point, we can't say. To repeat myself, this is a mess & the best solution would be to delete this article & add all theories about the connection between
333:. The situation is more complicated than a hoax. I have written a short explanation & a much longer one for why this article needs to be deleted.The short version: This article is a mess, even without the material copied from the consul of 57 BC. Searching thru
465:& I are agreed it is a mess & should be deleted; the only possible point of debate (as I understand) is whether all verifiable information should be added to the articles on Creticus & Creticus Silanus now or after the article is deleted. --
412:, also shows Creticus's hypothetical son Marcus with a hypothetical son Quintus, who is identified as Creticus Silanus' adoptive father. (Confirming claim 3.) Could this be the subject of the article under discussion? Again, notability is not inherited.
345:
for Q. Caecilius
Metellus Creticus Silanus as "Q.f.M.n." (son of Quintus, grandson of Marcus), so the claimed parentage in this article is wrong. And if this person existed, were he the son of a notable person & the father of another,
201:
232:
There's no evidence for the existence of the person which matches the biographical details given in the article. The page was created in 2007 by a now banned user, using an unreliable source which somebody later removed.
388:
speculation (e.g. that
Caecilius Metellus the Younger from Actium was the same person as a proconsul of Sardinia in AD 6), but these inferences need to be clearly labelled as inferences & speculation, not facts.
195:
135:
130:
139:
122:
162:
268:
430:
109:
392:
And sometimes the discovery of a new inscription or a papyrus document will upset all of the theories & force us to accept a prevously discarded one.
94:
216:
183:
474:
456:
442:
426:
325:
304:
280:
260:
242:
64:
447:
Perhaps it is not a hoax, but since the article mixes elements from several people without source, I don't think it is worth saving.
177:
247:
EDIT: there is actually a vaguely-sourced bit which was later added by an IP, but the information pertains to the similarly-named
334:
173:
126:
89:
82:
17:
341:(vol. 2), I was unable to find any plebeian tribune with the name of Q. Caecilius Metellus. Further, another source gives the
461:
It could be a hoax, or not one; its creator is no longer active at
Knowledge, so his motivation cannot be learned. But you
223:
118:
70:
103:
99:
383:
The first claim has been addressed: there is no reliable source for it. The fourth claim is a bit trickier: Appian (
495:
40:
189:
491:
36:
300:
276:
209:
470:
438:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
490:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
256:
238:
453:
322:
295:, seems to be a common name, but no-one of that name seems to exist in that time period.
347:
313:
296:
292:
272:
55:
466:
434:
156:
395:
252:
234:
462:
448:
317:
342:
410:
370:
Q. Metellus (using the short version of his name) is a plebeian tribune
486:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
405:
This stemma, which relies on a paper T.P. Wiseman published in
379:
He participated on Mark
Anthony's side in the Battle of Actium.
152:
148:
144:
208:
366:There are four claims in this stub of an article:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
498:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:Note: This discussion has been included in the
249:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Nepos (consul 57 BC)
373:Q. Metellus is the son of Q. Metellus Creticus
269:list of Military-related deletion discussions
222:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
431:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Creticus Silanus
354:
266:
376:He adopted Q. Metellus Creticus Silanus
357:
433:to the existing relevant articles. --
251:, of which an article already exists.
7:
119:Quintus Caecilius Metellus (tribune)
71:Quintus Caecilius Metellus (tribune)
427:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Creticus
24:
339:Magistrates of the Roman Republic
95:Introduction to deletion process
335:Thomas Robert Shannon Broughton
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
475:06:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
457:21:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
443:17:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
326:14:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
305:03:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
281:01:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
261:18:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
243:01:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
65:13:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
515:
488:Please do not modify it.
400:The Augustan Aristocracy
32:Please do not modify it.
83:Articles for deletion
420:
419:
350:is not inherited.
283:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
506:
451:
359:The long version
355:
320:
227:
226:
212:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
514:
513:
509:
508:
507:
505:
504:
503:
502:
496:deletion review
449:
421:
360:
318:
169:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
512:
510:
501:
500:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
418:
417:
381:
380:
377:
374:
371:
362:
361:
358:
353:
352:
351:
328:
307:
285:
284:
230:
229:
166:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
511:
499:
497:
493:
489:
484:
483:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
455:
452:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
416:
413:
411:
408:
403:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
378:
375:
372:
369:
368:
367:
364:
363:
356:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
324:
321:
315:
311:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
265:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
240:
236:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
487:
485:
414:
406:
404:
399:
394:
390:
384:
382:
365:
338:
330:
309:
288:
248:
246:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
396:Ronald Syme
196:free images
348:notability
58:Sandstein
492:talk page
343:filiation
297:Mztourist
273:Shellwood
37:talk page
494:or in a
409:in 1965
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
467:llywrch
435:llywrch
407:Latomus
398:in his
314:WP:HOAX
293:WP:HOAX
202:WP refs
190:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
454:(talk)
429:&
331:Delete
323:(talk)
310:Delete
289:Delete
253:Avis11
235:Avis11
174:Google
140:delete
50:delete
463:T8612
450:T8612
319:T8612
217:JSTOR
178:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
471:talk
439:talk
385:B.C.
301:talk
277:talk
257:talk
239:talk
210:FENS
184:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
337:'s
312:as
291:as
224:TWL
161:– (
473:)
441:)
316:.
303:)
279:)
271:.
259:)
241:)
204:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
469:(
437:(
299:(
275:(
255:(
237:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.