453:
articles, while at the same time trolling those editors to make their job difficult and discourage them with distractions. Apparently it takes no time to resurrect hundreds of Navy Cross/Ship name honorees for deletion. It takes a lot of time to respond and improve all of these articles. This is in fact a second nomination (among many). And given the fact that there is no good faith compliance with
515:. And there is really nothing to merge. This is a perfect example of why having a ship named after you is not a sign of notability, but simply a result politicking. Any man/woman who serves their country's armed forces is to be lauded, but this man simply died during that service. Tragic, but not notable.
452:
This is relevant, and it should be fixed. It is a fact. It is always put into the history. I've never seen this, and it is a direct result of the misbegotten attempt to purge a couple of hundred articles. And all at once, overwhelming the limited number of editors who actively try to save
360:. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are next to no inline refs in the article, but we can probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--
437:
As a matter of housekeeping, I would note that this is there is a previous nomination for deletion that just went down the tubes. This is he second nomination. This fact is being knowingly suppressed – on this and many articles. See
203:
284:
164:
439:
197:
269:
254:
384:
per above. Doesn't pass for a stand alone article, but the content will improve the target article, be less fragmented, and give the content more readership. Per
96:
111:
420:, it's more appropriate to have relevant information about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best,
137:
132:
457:
and a blatant disregard of sources that exist but aren't cited — which do factor in to notability, this sneak attack is (dare I say it) ...
141:
124:
62:
91:
84:
17:
218:
459:
185:
105:
101:
448:
This is a procedural hijack and an attempt to make sure that editors who do their job properly won't have time to respond.
565:
40:
486:
179:
442:. The record should be corrected accordingly. There is a systemic attempt to hide that fact over many articles.
315:
547:
526:
493:
429:
404:
372:
348:
319:
291:
276:
261:
246:
66:
175:
478:. The protocol is that one should not only look at the present cited sources, but available sources, too.
128:
335:(Ensign lost at sea having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and
225:
561:
480:
399:
36:
512:
390:"Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article."
543:
311:
332:
235:
344:
211:
475:
454:
307:
56:. Editors have discretion what content to merge to the new target article from page history. --
191:
366:
120:
80:
72:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
560:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
395:
508:
471:
336:
239:
539:
425:
340:
385:
516:
362:
288:
273:
258:
243:
158:
535:
504:
417:
381:
357:
328:
53:
467:
The navy considered him significant enough that they named a warship after him.
421:
556:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
285:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
463:. You are distorting the process and rigging the outcomes.
440:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Edward Henry Allen
154:
150:
146:
210:
224:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
568:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
253:Note: This discussion has been included in the
270:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
339:. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable.
255:list of People-related deletion discussions
302:A warship was named after him which is a "
282:
267:
252:
507:. Clearly doesn't come close to meeting
363:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
511:, and doesn't come close to meeting
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
460:a date that will live in infamy
1:
548:01:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
527:16:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
494:13:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
430:02:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
405:06:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
373:09:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
349:03:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
320:18:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
292:17:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
277:17:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
262:17:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
247:17:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
67:13:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
585:
304:significant award or honor
470:Subject meets or exceeds
558:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
474:. No compliance with
85:Articles for deletion
294:
279:
264:
121:Robert E. Brister
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
73:Robert E. Brister
576:
523:
520:
492:
482:7&6=thirteen
403:
369:
229:
228:
214:
162:
144:
82:
34:
584:
583:
579:
578:
577:
575:
574:
573:
572:
566:deletion review
521:
518:
479:
392:
371:
367:
171:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
65:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
582:
580:
571:
570:
552:
551:
529:
497:
496:
468:
465:
464:
450:
449:
445:
444:
443:
432:
407:
375:
361:
351:
322:
306:and so passes
296:
295:
280:
265:
232:
231:
168:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
581:
569:
567:
563:
559:
554:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:, fails GNG.
537:
533:
530:
528:
525:
524:
514:
510:
506:
502:
499:
498:
495:
490:
489:
484:
483:
477:
473:
469:
466:
462:
461:
456:
451:
447:
446:
441:
436:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
406:
402:
401:
397:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
374:
370:
364:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
297:
293:
290:
286:
281:
278:
275:
271:
266:
263:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
63:contributions
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
557:
555:
531:
517:
500:
487:
481:
458:
434:
413:
409:
393:
389:
377:
353:
324:
303:
299:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
78:
58:Patar knight
49:
47:
31:
28:
536:USS Brister
513:WP:NSOLDIER
505:USS Brister
418:USS Brister
382:USS Brister
358:USS Brister
329:USS Brister
198:free images
54:USS Brister
540:Cavalryman
368:reply here
333:WP:SOLDIER
236:WP:SOLDIER
562:talk page
476:WP:Before
455:WP:Before
341:Mztourist
308:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
564:or in a
532:Redirect
501:Redirect
410:Redirect
331:. Fails
325:Redirect
165:View log
106:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
396:Timothy
289:Lettler
274:Lettler
259:Lettler
244:Lettler
204:WP refs
192:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
509:WP:GNG
472:WP:GNG
337:WP:GNG
312:Andrew
240:WP:GNG
234:Fails
176:Google
142:delete
422:GPL93
414:Merge
378:Merge
354:Merge
219:JSTOR
180:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
544:talk
522:5969
519:Onel
435:Keep
426:talk
412:and
400:talk
386:WP:N
345:talk
316:talk
300:Keep
238:and
212:FENS
186:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
534:to
503:to
416:to
398:::
394://
380:to
356:to
327:to
314:🐉(
226:TWL
163:– (
60:- /
52:to
546:)
428:)
388:,
347:)
318:)
310:.
287:.
272:.
257:.
242:.
206:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
550:.
542:(
491:)
488:☎
485:(
424:(
365:|
343:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.